A conditional Granger causality model approach for group analysis in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Granger causality model (GCM) derived from multivariate vector autoregressive models of data has been employed to identify effective connectivity in the human brain with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and to reveal complex temporal and spatial dynamics underlying a variety of cognitive processes. In the most recent fMRI effective connectivity measures, pair-wise GCM has commonly been applied based on single-voxel values or average values from special brain areas at the group level. Although a few novel conditional GCM methods have been proposed to quantify the connections between brain areas, our study is the first to propose a viable standardized approach for group analysis of fMRI data with GCM. To compare the effectiveness of our approach with traditional pair-wise GCM models, we applied a well-established conditional GCM to preselected time series of brain regions resulting from general linear model (GLM) and group spatial kernel independent component analysis of an fMRI data set in the temporal domain. Data sets consisting of one task-related and one resting-state fMRI were used to investigate connections among brain areas with the conditional GCM method. With the GLM-detected brain activation regions in the emotion-related cortex during the block design paradigm, the conditional GCM method was proposed to study the causality of the habituation between the left amygdala and pregenual cingulate cortex during emotion processing. For the resting-state data set, it is possible to calculate not only the effective connectivity between networks but also the heterogeneity within a single network. Our results have further shown a particular interacting pattern of default mode network that can be characterized as both afferent and efferent influences on the medial prefrontal cortex and posterior cingulate cortex. These results suggest that the conditional GCM approach based on a linear multivariate vector autoregressive model can achieve greater accuracy in detecting network connectivity than the widely used pair-wise GCM, and this group analysis methodology can be quite useful to extend the information obtainable in fMRI.

[1]  Hongtu Zhu,et al.  An FMRI study of the effects of psychostimulants on default-mode processing during Stroop task performance in youths with ADHD. , 2009, The American journal of psychiatry.

[2]  B. Vogt Pain and emotion interactions in subregions of the cingulate gyrus , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  Christian Keysers,et al.  Inferior frontal gyrus activity triggers anterior insula response to emotional facial expressions. , 2008, Emotion.

[4]  Luiz A Baccalá,et al.  Frequency domain connectivity identification: An application of partial directed coherence in fMRI , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[5]  M. Greicius,et al.  A cross‐modal system linking primary auditory and visual cortices: Evidence from intrinsic fMRI connectivity analysis , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[6]  G. Wilson The Factorization of Matricial Spectral Densities , 1972 .

[7]  R. Buckner,et al.  Self-projection and the brain , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  G L Shulman,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:A default mode of brain function , 2001 .

[9]  Yijun Liu,et al.  Analyzing brain networks with PCA and conditional Granger causality , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[10]  Qin Yang,et al.  Evaluation of the effective connectivity of supplementary motor areas during motor imagery using Granger causality mapping , 2009, NeuroImage.

[11]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[12]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Investigating directed cortical interactions in time-resolved fMRI data using vector autoregressive modeling and Granger causality mapping. , 2003, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[13]  W. Drevets,et al.  Functional neuroimaging studies of depression: the anatomy of melancholia. , 1998, Annual review of medicine.

[14]  Matthew L. Ho,et al.  Differential brain metabolic predictors of response to paroxetine in obsessive-compulsive disorder versus major depression. , 2003, The American journal of psychiatry.

[15]  M. Greicius,et al.  Default-mode network activity distinguishes Alzheimer's disease from healthy aging: Evidence from functional MRI , 2004, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[16]  G. Shulman,et al.  Medial prefrontal cortex and self-referential mental activity: Relation to a default mode of brain function , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  João Ricardo Sato,et al.  A method to produce evolving functional connectivity maps during the course of an fMRI experiment using wavelet-based time-varying Granger causality , 2006, NeuroImage.

[18]  P. Fox,et al.  355. Cingulate metabolism predicts treatment response: a replication , 2000, Biological Psychiatry.

[19]  Yijun Liu,et al.  Neutral faces activate the amygdala during identity matching , 2006, NeuroImage.

[20]  M. Lowe,et al.  Functional Connectivity in Single and Multislice Echoplanar Imaging Using Resting-State Fluctuations , 1998, NeuroImage.

[21]  C. Li,et al.  Behavioral/systems/cognitive Functional Connectivity Delineates Distinct Roles of the Inferior Frontal Cortex and Presupplementary Motor Area in Stop Signal Inhibition , 2022 .

[22]  D. Schacter,et al.  The Brain's Default Network , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[23]  N. Logothetis The neural basis of the blood-oxygen-level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging signal. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[24]  A. Roebroeck,et al.  FMRI Effective Connectivity and TMS Chronometry: Complementary Accounts of Causality in the Visuospatial Judgment Network , 2009, PloS one.

[25]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  Large-scale brain networks account for sustained and transient activity during target detection , 2009, NeuroImage.

[26]  Kristen A. Lindgren,et al.  Effective and Structural Connectivity in the Human Auditory Cortex , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[28]  Anke Meyer-Bäse,et al.  ICA, kernel methods and nonnegativity: New paradigms for dynamical component analysis of fMRI data , 2009, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[29]  Amanda L. Kaas,et al.  Imagery of a moving object: The role of occipital cortex and human MT/V5+ , 2010, NeuroImage.

[30]  J. Gross,et al.  The cognitive control of emotion , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Kernel independent component analysis , 2003 .

[32]  J. Geweke,et al.  Measurement of Linear Dependence and Feedback between Multiple Time Series , 1982 .

[33]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Analyzing information flow in brain networks with nonparametric Granger causality , 2008, NeuroImage.

[34]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Changes in the interaction of resting‐state neural networks from adolescence to adulthood , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[35]  Benjamin J. Shannon,et al.  Coherent spontaneous activity identifies a hippocampal-parietal memory network. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  Xiaoping Hu,et al.  Multivariate Granger causality analysis of fMRI data , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[37]  Xiaoping Hu,et al.  Posteromedial Parietal Cortical Activity and Inputs Predict Tactile Spatial Acuity , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  C. Granger Testing for causality: a personal viewpoint , 1980 .

[39]  Soon Chun Siong,et al.  Role of medial cortical, hippocampal and striatal interactions during cognitive set-shifting , 2009, NeuroImage.

[40]  R. Goebel,et al.  Investigating directed influences between activated brain areas in a motor-response task using fMRI. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[41]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Detecting directional influence in fMRI connectivity analysis using PCA based Granger causality , 2009, Brain Research.

[42]  Suzanne T. Witt,et al.  The Effects of Computational Method, Data Modeling, and TR on Effective Connectivity Results , 2009, Brain Imaging and Behavior.

[43]  Demis Basso,et al.  Sensory‐motor brain network connectivity for speech comprehension , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[44]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  A comparison of Granger causality and coherency in fMRI‐based analysis of the motor system , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[45]  J. Geweke,et al.  Measures of Conditional Linear Dependence and Feedback between Time Series , 1984 .

[46]  Karl J. Friston Dynamic causal modeling and Granger causality Comments on: The identification of interacting networks in the brain using fMRI: Model selection, causality and deconvolution , 2011, NeuroImage.

[47]  T. Adali,et al.  Unmixing fMRI with independent component analysis , 2006, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[48]  A. D’Ausilio,et al.  Brain network for passive word listening as evaluated with ICA and Granger causality , 2007, Brain Research Bulletin.

[49]  Otto W. Witte,et al.  Modelling and analysis of time-variant directed interrelations between brain regions based on BOLD-signals , 2009, NeuroImage.

[50]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Investigation of relationships between fMRI brain networks in the spectral domain using ICA and Granger causality reveals distinct differences between schizophrenia patients and healthy controls , 2009, NeuroImage.

[51]  F Babiloni,et al.  Signal Informatics as an Advanced Integrative Concept in the Framework of Medical Informatics , 2009, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[52]  C. Granger Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods , 1969 .

[53]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[54]  S. Houle,et al.  Changes in regional brain glucose metabolism measured with positron emission tomography after paroxetine treatment of major depression. , 2001, The American journal of psychiatry.

[55]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  A method for functional network connectivity among spatially independent resting-state components in schizophrenia , 2008, NeuroImage.

[56]  J. Pekar,et al.  A method for making group inferences from functional MRI data using independent component analysis , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[57]  B. Biswal,et al.  The resting brain: unconstrained yet reliable. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[58]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  A review of group ICA for fMRI data and ICA for joint inference of imaging, genetic, and ERP data , 2009, NeuroImage.

[59]  Demis Basso,et al.  A new method for detecting causality in fMRI data of cognitive processing , 2006, Cognitive Processing.

[60]  P. Jerabek,et al.  Regional metabolic effects of fluoxetine in major depression: serial changes and relationship to clinical response , 2000, Biological Psychiatry.

[61]  Zhi-jun Zhang,et al.  Detection of PCC functional connectivity characteristics in resting-state fMRI in mild Alzheimer’s disease , 2009, Behavioural Brain Research.

[62]  C. Segebarth,et al.  Identifying Neural Drivers with Functional MRI: An Electrophysiological Validation , 2008, PLoS biology.

[63]  P. Fox,et al.  Cingulate function in depression: a potential predictor of treatment response , 1997, Neuroreport.

[64]  Yihong Yang,et al.  Evaluating the effective connectivity of resting state networks using conditional Granger causality , 2010, Biological Cybernetics.

[65]  Steven L. Bressler,et al.  Wiener–Granger Causality: A well established methodology , 2011, NeuroImage.

[66]  Joachim Gross,et al.  The effect of filtering on Granger causality based multivariate causality measures , 2010, NeuroImage.

[67]  V. Menon,et al.  A critical role for the right fronto-insular cortex in switching between central-executive and default-mode networks , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[68]  H. Mayberg Modulating dysfunctional limbic-cortical circuits in depression: towards development of brain-based algorithms for diagnosis and optimised treatment. , 2003, British medical bulletin.

[69]  John C Gore,et al.  Functional MRI and multivariate autoregressive models. , 2010, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[70]  R. Edelman,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging (2) , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[71]  S. Rauch,et al.  Differential prefrontal cortex and amygdala habituation to repeatedly presented emotional stimuli , 2001, Neuroreport.

[72]  J. Jan,et al.  Extended time-frequency granger causality for evaluation of functional network connectivity in event-related FMRI data , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[73]  Karl J. Friston Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: A synthesis , 1994 .

[74]  Wei Liao,et al.  Nonlinear connectivity by Granger causality , 2011, NeuroImage.

[75]  S. Bressler,et al.  Frequency decomposition of conditional Granger causality and application to multivariate neural field potential data , 2006, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[76]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity of default mode network components: Correlation, anticorrelation, and causality , 2009, Human brain mapping.