Bayesian Persuasion With State-Dependent Quadratic Cost Measures

We address Bayesian persuasion between a sender and a receiver with state-dependent quadratic cost measures for general classes of distributions. The receiver seeks to make mean-square-error estimate of a state based on a signal sent by the sender while the sender signals strategically in order to control the receiver's estimate in a certain way. Such a scheme could model, e.g., deception and privacy, problems in multi-agent systems. Existing solution concepts are not viable since here the receiver has continuous action space. We show that for finite state spaces, optimal signaling strategies can be computed through an equivalent linear optimization problem over the cone of completely positive matrices. We then establish its strong duality to a copositive program. To exemplify the effectiveness of this equivalence result, we adopt sequential polyhedral approximation of completely-positive cones and analyze its performance numerically. We also quantify the approximation error for a quantized version of a continuous distribution and show that a semi-definite program relaxation of the equivalent problem could be a benchmark lower bound for the sender's cost for large state spaces.

[1]  Emir Kamenica,et al.  Bayesian Persuasion and Information Design , 2019, Annual Review of Economics.

[2]  Ting Kei Pong,et al.  Inner approximating the completely positive cone via the cone of scaled diagonally dominant matrices , 2018, J. Glob. Optim..

[3]  E. Alper Yildirim,et al.  On the accuracy of uniform polyhedral approximations of the copositive cone , 2012, Optim. Methods Softw..

[4]  Tamer Başar,et al.  Hierarchical multistage Gaussian signaling games in noncooperative communication and control systems , 2016, Autom..

[5]  Sinan Gezici,et al.  Quadratic Multi-Dimensional Signaling Games and Affine Equilibria , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[6]  Tamer Basar,et al.  Deception-As-Defense Framework for Cyber-Physical Systems , 2019, ArXiv.

[7]  Haifeng Xu,et al.  Algorithmic Bayesian persuasion , 2015, STOC.

[8]  W. Tamura A Theory of Multidimensional Information Disclosure , 2014 .

[9]  Tamer Basar,et al.  Robust Sensor Design Against Multiple Attackers with Misaligned Control Objectives , 2019, ArXiv.

[10]  Emir Kamenica,et al.  A Rothschild-Stiglitz Approach to Bayesian Persuasion , 2016 .

[11]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Graph Implementations for Nonsmooth Convex Programs , 2008, Recent Advances in Learning and Control.

[12]  J. Sobel,et al.  STRATEGIC INFORMATION TRANSMISSION , 1982 .

[13]  A. Kolotilin Optimal Information Disclosure: A Linear Programming Approach , 2016 .

[14]  Tamer Başar,et al.  Information-Theoretic Approach to Strategic Communication as a Hierarchical Game , 2015, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[15]  Piotr Dworczak,et al.  The Simple Economics of Optimal Persuasion , 2019, Journal of Political Economy.

[16]  Shaddin Dughmi,et al.  Algorithmic information structure design: a survey , 2017, SECO.

[17]  Muhammed O. Sayin,et al.  Persuasion-Based Robust Sensor Design Against Attackers With Unknown Control Objectives , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[18]  F. Tardella On the existence of polyhedral convex envelopes , 2004 .

[19]  Farhad Farokhi,et al.  Estimation With Strategic Sensors , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[20]  E. Alper Yildirim Inner approximations of completely positive reformulations of mixed binary quadratic programs: a unified analysis , 2017, Optim. Methods Softw..

[21]  Henryk Minc,et al.  On the Matrix Equation X′X = A , 1962, Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society.

[22]  Mirjam Dür,et al.  An Adaptive Linear Approximation Algorithm for Copositive Programs , 2009, SIAM J. Optim..