Computer-Assisted Negotiations of Water Resources Conflicts

This paper describes the algorithms within and results obtained using an interactive computer program developed to assist those involved in negotiating agreements among parties having conflicting objectives. This Interactive Computer-Assisted Negotiation Support system (ICANS) can be used during the negotiation process by opposing parties or by a professional mediator. On the basis of information provided to the program, in confidence, by each party, it can help all parties identify feasible alternatives, if any exist, that should be preferred to each party's proposal. If such alternatives do not exist, the program can help parties develop counter proposals. Through a series of iterations in which each party's input data, assumptions, and preferences may change, ICANS can aid each party in their search for a mutually acceptable and preferred agreement. This paper describes the algorithms used for analyzing preferences and for generating alternative feasible agreements. Also presented a re the results of some limited experiments involving water resource system development and use conflicts that illustrate the potential of programs such as ICANS.

[1]  James K. Sebenius,et al.  The Manager as Negotiator: Bargaining for Cooperation and Competitive Gain , 1986 .

[2]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[3]  Daniel P. Loucks,et al.  COMPUTER ASSISTED NEGOTIATION OF MULTIOBJECTIVE WATER RESOURCES CONFLICTS1 , 1992 .

[4]  Tawfik Jelassi,et al.  Negotiation support systems: an overview of design issues and existing software , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[5]  M. Tawfik Jelassi,et al.  A development framework for computer-supported conflict resolution , 1990 .

[6]  K. Hipel Multiple objective decision making in water resources , 1992 .

[7]  J. F. Nunamaker,et al.  Experience with and future challenges in GDSS (group decision support systems): Preface , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[8]  H. Raiffa The art and science of negotiation , 1983 .

[9]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  An Introduction to Group Decision and Negotiation Support , 1990 .

[10]  M. Bazerman Negotiator Judgment , 1983 .

[11]  Charles Leake Interactive Decision Making: The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution , 1993 .

[12]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  Functions of a third party in the resolution of conflict: The role of a judge in pretrial conferences. , 1974 .

[13]  Markku Kuula,et al.  A decision support approach for negotiation with an application to agricultural income policy negotiations , 1995 .

[14]  Michael E. Holmes,et al.  Conflict management in a computer-supported meeting in a computer supported meeting environment , 1991 .

[15]  Elizabeth Hunt Jones,et al.  Analytical mediation: an empirical examination of the effects of computer support for different levels of conflict in two-party negotiation , 1988 .

[16]  Jerome Delli Priscoli Conflict Resolution in Water Resources: Two 404 General Permits , 1988 .

[17]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  A procedure for negotiating efficient and non-efficient compromises , 1988, Decis. Support Syst..

[18]  A. Foroughi,et al.  NSS solutions to major negotiation stumbling blocks , 1990, Twenty-Third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[19]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Objective Decision Making , 1994 .

[21]  Kalyan Chatterjee,et al.  The impact of information and computer based training on negotiators' performance , 1990 .

[22]  P. Gulliver Disputes and Negotiations: A Cross-Cultural Perspective , 1979 .

[23]  Alan McDonald International River Basin Negotiations: Building a Database of Illustrative Successes , 1988 .

[24]  Bernd Holznagel Negotiation and Mediation: The Newest Approach to Hazardous Waste Facility Siting , 1986 .