Automated VOI analysis in 18 F-FDDNP PET using structural warping: Validation through classification of Alzheimer's disease patients

In the field of quantitative imaging, the creation of accurate volumes of interest (VOIs) is often of central importance. However, the process of creating these VOIS for multiple subjects can be time-intensive and there are many chances to introduce variability on inter- and intra-investigator levels. Although pre­vious work has shown that image normalization through cortical surface mapping can be helpful in VOI analysis, the process is complicated and labor-intensive. In this paper we present a method to eliminate this variability by warping structural and functional images to a common space in which valid VOIs already exist. We apply this method to a study of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and 2-(1-{6-[(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)(methyl)amino]-2-naphthyl}ethylidene)malononitrile (FDDNP), which is known to co-localize with amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. We normalize the MRIs of control subjects and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD patients, to a common space. The same normalization is applied to FDDNP PET images. The normalization technique reduces average voxel-to-voxel variance in MRIs by 54% as compared to linear normalization alone. Biologically important structures, such as the segmentation between white and gray matter, are maintained after normalization. Discriminant analysis shows that data extracted from VOIs in the common space out-performs data extracted from unnormalized PET images in classifying subjects as control, MCI, or AD. This suggests that image normalization may be useful in eliminating inter- and intra-investigator variability and increasing the predic­tive capability of data extracted from imaging modalities. Further study will examine the applicability of this method to predicting longitudinal changes in cognitive ability from functional imaging data.

[1]  R. Petersen,et al.  Mild cognitive impairment , 2006, The Lancet.

[2]  Sung-Cheng Huang,et al.  Movement Correction Method for Human Brain PET Images: Application to Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic 18F-FDDNP Scans , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  Sung-Cheng Huang,et al.  Microstructural Imaging of Neurodegenerative Changes , 2009 .

[4]  Alexander Hammers,et al.  Three‐dimensional maximum probability atlas of the human brain, with particular reference to the temporal lobe , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[5]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Fddnp Binding Using Mr Derived Cortical Surface Maps , 2022 .

[6]  Arno Klein,et al.  Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration , 2009, NeuroImage.

[7]  P. Scheltens,et al.  Research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: revising the NINCDS–ADRDA criteria , 2007, The Lancet Neurology.

[8]  D. Neary,et al.  Evaluation of the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria in the differentiation of Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia , 1999, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[9]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: Evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[10]  H. Braak,et al.  Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes , 2004, Acta Neuropathologica.

[11]  J Mazziotta,et al.  A probabilistic atlas and reference system for the human brain: International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM). , 2001, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[12]  R. Petersen Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity , 2004, Journal of internal medicine.

[13]  Tom Vercauteren,et al.  Diffeomorphic demons: Efficient non-parametric image registration , 2009, NeuroImage.

[14]  Sung-Cheng Huang,et al.  Visualizing pathology deposits in the living brain of patients with Alzheimer's disease. , 2006, Methods in enzymology.

[15]  N. Volkow,et al.  Distribution Volume Ratios without Blood Sampling from Graphical Analysis of PET Data , 1996, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[16]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[17]  John Ashburner,et al.  A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm , 2007, NeuroImage.

[18]  A. Toga,et al.  Detection and mapping of abnormal brain structure with a probabilistic atlas of cortical surfaces. , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[19]  Babak A. Ardekani,et al.  Quantitative comparison of algorithms for inter-subject registration of 3D volumetric brain MRI scans , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[20]  Vladimir Kepe,et al.  High-Yield, Automated Radiosynthesis of 2-(1-{6-[(2-[18F]Fluoroethyl)(methyl)amino]-2-naphthyl}ethylidene)malononitrile ([18F]FDDNP) Ready for Animal or Human Administration , 2006, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[21]  E. Tangalos,et al.  Neuropathologic features of amnestic mild cognitive impairment. , 2006, Archives of neurology.

[22]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric mapping , 2013 .

[23]  J. Ashburner,et al.  Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[24]  P. Thompson,et al.  PET of brain amyloid and tau in mild cognitive impairment. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  J. Morris,et al.  Tangles and plaques in nondemented aging and “preclinical” Alzheimer's disease , 1999, Annals of neurology.

[26]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.