Representations of conspecific song by starling secondary forebrain auditory neurons: toward a hierarchical framework.

The functional organization giving rise to stimulus selectivity in higher-order auditory neurons remains under active study. We explored the selectivity for motifs, spectrotemporally distinct perceptual units in starling song, recording the responses of 96 caudomedial mesopallium (CMM) neurons in European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) under awake-restrained and urethane-anesthetized conditions. A subset of neurons was highly selective between motifs. Selectivity was correlated with low spontaneous firing rates and high spike timing precision, and all but one of the selective neurons had similar spike waveforms. Neurons were further tested with stimuli in which the notes comprising the motifs were manipulated. Responses to most of the isolated notes were similar in amplitude, duration, and temporal pattern to the responses elicited by those notes in the context of the motif. For these neurons, we could accurately predict the responses to motifs from the sum of the responses to notes. Some notes were suppressed by the motif context, such that removing other notes from motifs unmasked additional excitation. Models of linear summation of note responses consistently outperformed spectrotemporal receptive field models in predicting responses to song stimuli. Tests with randomized sequences of notes confirmed the predictive power of these models. Whole notes gave better predictions than did note fragments. Thus in CMM, auditory objects (motifs) can be represented by a linear combination of excitation and suppression elicited by the note components of the object. We hypothesize that the receptive fields arise from selective convergence by inputs responding to specific spectrotemporal features of starling notes.

[1]  H. Scheich,et al.  Responsiveness of units in the auditory neostriatum of the guinea fowl (Numida meleagris) to species-specific calls and synthetic stimuli , 1979, Journal of comparative physiology.

[2]  Bruno A Olshausen,et al.  Sparse coding of sensory inputs , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[3]  D. Margoliash,et al.  Temporal and harmonic combination-sensitive neurons in the zebra finch's HVc , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  Björn Capsius,et al.  Influence of urethane anesthesia on neural processing in the auditory cortex analogue of a songbird , 1996, Hearing Research.

[5]  N Suga,et al.  Target range-sensitive neurons in the auditory cortex of the mustache bat. , 1979, Science.

[6]  Gilles Laurent,et al.  A Simple Connectivity Scheme for Sparse Coding in an Olfactory System , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Marcel Eens,et al.  Male song as a cue for mate choice in the European starling , 1991 .

[8]  D. Margoliash,et al.  Neuronal populations and single cells representing learned auditory objects , 2003, Nature.

[9]  Katherine I. Nagel,et al.  Organizing Principles of Spectro-Temporal Encoding in the Avian Primary Auditory Area Field L , 2008, Neuron.

[10]  W. Wien,et al.  Econometric Computing with HC and HAC Covariance Matrix Estimators , 2004 .

[11]  D. Margoliash,et al.  The Neuroethology of Vocal Communication: Perception and Cognition , 2003 .

[12]  Anne Hsu,et al.  Tuning for spectro-temporal modulations as a mechanism for auditory discrimination of natural sounds , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  G. E. Vates,et al.  Auditory pathways of caudal telencephalon and their relation to the song system of adult male zebra finches (Taenopygia guttata) , 1996, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[14]  K. Sen,et al.  Feature analysis of natural sounds in the songbird auditory forebrain. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  M. Sahani,et al.  The Consequences of Response Nonlinearities for Interpretation of Spectrotemporal Receptive Fields , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Peter L. Rauske,et al.  State and neuronal class-dependent reconfiguration in the avian song system. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  H. Leppelsack,et al.  Responses of auditory neurons in the forebrain of a songbird to stimulation with species-specific sounds , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[18]  Allison J Doupe,et al.  Neural encoding of auditory temporal context in a songbird basal ganglia nucleus, and its independence of birds' song experience , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[19]  N Suga,et al.  Specialization of the auditory system for reception and processing of species-specific sounds. , 1978, Federation proceedings.

[20]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  D. McCormick,et al.  Comparative electrophysiology of pyramidal and sparsely spiny stellate neurons of the neocortex. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  D. Margoliash Acoustic parameters underlying the responses of song-specific neurons in the white-crowned sparrow , 1983, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[23]  P. Marler,et al.  Categorical perception of a natural stimulus continuum: birdsong. , 1989, Science.

[24]  William Bialek,et al.  Analyzing Neural Responses to Natural Signals: Maximally Informative Dimensions , 2002, Neural Computation.

[25]  Timothy Q. Gentner,et al.  Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds , 2006, Nature.

[26]  Li I. Zhang,et al.  Tone-evoked excitatory and inhibitory synaptic conductances of primary auditory cortex neurons. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  M S Lewicki,et al.  Hierarchical Organization of Auditory Temporal Context Sensitivity , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Maoz Shamir,et al.  Cortical Discrimination of Complex Natural Stimuli: Can Single Neurons Match Behavior? , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Lee M. Miller,et al.  The Contribution of Spike Threshold to Acoustic Feature Selectivity, Spike Information Content, and Information Throughput , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  T. Poggio,et al.  Neural mechanisms of object recognition , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[31]  N. C. Singh,et al.  Selectivity for conspecific song in the zebra finch auditory forebrain. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  Social influences on vocal development: Social influences on song acquisition and sharing in the European starling ( Sturnus vulgaris ) , 1997 .

[33]  A. Aertsen,et al.  The Spectro-Temporal Receptive Field , 1981, Biological Cybernetics.

[34]  H B Barlow,et al.  PATTERN RECOGNITION AND THE RESPONSES OF SENSORY NEURONS * , 1969, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[35]  J. Movshon,et al.  The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[36]  A. Liberman,et al.  The discrimination of relative onset-time of the components of certain speech and nonspeech patterns. , 1961, Journal of experimental psychology.

[37]  K. D. Roeder Auditory System of Noctuid Moths , 1966, Science.

[38]  M. Sahani,et al.  Nonlinearities and Contextual Influences in Auditory Cortical Responses Modeled with Multilinear Spectrotemporal Methods , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Neuronal selectivities to complex object features in the ventral visual pathway of the macaque cerebral cortex. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  William A. Searcy,et al.  Song types as fundamental units in vocal repertoires , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[41]  D Margoliash,et al.  Preference for autogenous song by auditory neurons in a song system nucleus of the white-crowned sparrow , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[42]  Dezhe Z. Jin,et al.  Support for a synaptic chain model of neuronal sequence generation , 2010, Nature.

[43]  J. J. Eggermont,et al.  Quantitative characterisation procedure for auditory neurons based on the spectro-temporal receptive field , 1983, Hearing Research.

[44]  H. Karten,et al.  The ascending auditory pathway in the pigeon (Columba livia). II. Telencephalic projections of the nucleus ovoidalis thalami. , 1968, Brain research.

[45]  Johannes C. Dahmen,et al.  Learning to hear: plasticity of auditory cortical processing , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[46]  P. F. Jenkins,et al.  Complex organization of the warbling song in the European starling Sturnus vulgaris , 1988 .

[47]  I. Nelken,et al.  Responses of Neurons in Cat Primary Auditory Cortex to Bird Chirps: Effects of Temporal and Spectral Context , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[48]  M. Magnasco,et al.  Simple motor gestures for birdsongs. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[49]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Trade-Off between Object Selectivity and Tolerance in Monkey Inferotemporal Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  F. Theunissen From synchrony to sparseness , 2003, Trends in Neurosciences.

[51]  S. H. Hulse,et al.  Perceptual mechanisms for individual vocal recognition in European starlings,Sturnus vulgaris , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[52]  B. Batlogg,et al.  Auditory Spatial Receptive Fields Created by Multiplication , 2022 .

[53]  H. Karten,et al.  Connections of the auditory forebrain in the pigeon (columba livia) , 1993, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[54]  Virginia Best,et al.  Cortical interference effects in the cocktail party problem , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[55]  C. Müller,et al.  Feature extraction and tonotopic organization in the avian auditory forebrain , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[56]  M Konishi,et al.  Auditory Spatial Receptive Fields Created by Multiplication , 2001, Science.

[57]  M. Eens Understanding the complex song of the European starling: an integrated ethological approach , 1997 .

[58]  Alexander Borst,et al.  Quantifying variability in neural responses and its application for the validation of model predictions , 2004, Network.

[59]  Frédéric E Theunissen,et al.  Song Selectivity in the Song System and in the Auditory Forebrain , 2004, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[60]  Tatyana O Sharpee,et al.  On the importance of static nonlinearity in estimating spatiotemporal neural filters with natural stimuli. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[61]  S. Peters,et al.  Neural Correlates of Categorical Perception in Learned Vocal Communication , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[62]  Sidarta Ribeiro,et al.  Toward a Song Code Evidence for a Syllabic Representation in the Canary Brain , 1998, Neuron.

[63]  S. H. Hulse,et al.  Perceptual classification based on the component structure of song in European starlings. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[64]  J. Rauschecker Cortical processing of complex sounds , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[65]  C. Atencio,et al.  Cooperative Nonlinearities in Auditory Cortical Neurons , 2008, Neuron.

[66]  R. R. Capranica,et al.  The auditory system of anuran amphibians , 1984, Progress in Neurobiology.

[67]  S. H. Hulse,et al.  Female European starling preference and choice for variation in conspecific male song , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[68]  A. Zador,et al.  Balanced inhibition underlies tuning and sharpens spike timing in auditory cortex , 2003, Nature.