Comparison of Simulation and Hands-on Labs in Helping High School Students Learn Physics Concepts

The purpose of the research was to determine whether PhET simulation labs or hands-on labs were more effective in helping students learn physics concepts. This measure was done by comparing quiz scores using recall, calculation, and transfer questions. Additionally, student perceptions of learning from both hands-on and simulation lab experiences were measured. Six labs were conducted with high school physics students on the topics of momentum, energy, circuits, angular momentum, pendulums, and friction. It was found that PhET simulation labs were as effective at creating student understanding, and sometimes more effective, as measured by quizzes given after the labs. Additionally, the survey data revealed that students were more engaged by hands-on lab experiences, and viewed the hands-on labs to be more effective than the simulation labs.

[1]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  Computer Simulations to Support Science Instruction and Learning: A critical review of the literature , 2012 .

[2]  Zacharias C. Zacharia,et al.  Beliefs, attitudes, and intentions of science teachers regarding the educational use of computer simulations and inquiry‐based experiments in physics , 2003 .

[3]  Ruth Drake,et al.  Teaching for Transfer. , 2001 .

[4]  Emily B. Moore,et al.  Effective Student Learning of Fractions with an Interactive Simulation , 2015 .

[5]  J. Huppert,et al.  Computer simulations in the high school: Students' cognitive stages, science process skills and academic achievement in microbiology , 2002 .

[6]  Mario J. Durán,et al.  A learning methodology using Matlab/Simulink for undergraduate electrical engineering courses attending to learner satisfaction outcomes , 2007 .

[7]  Patricia M. Stohr-Hunt An analysis of frequency of hands‐on experience and science achievement , 1996 .

[8]  Jan T. van der Veen,et al.  The learning effects of computer simulations in science education , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[9]  J. Lagowski National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[10]  Sabine Grunwald,et al.  Development of an environmental virtual field laboratory , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[11]  D. Boud,et al.  Student Self-Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis , 1989 .

[12]  Noah S. Podolefsky,et al.  When learning about the real world is better done virtually: A study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment , 2005 .

[13]  W. V. van Joolingen,et al.  Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains , 1998 .

[14]  Yan Wang,et al.  Research Article Investigating the Effectiveness of Computer Simulations for Chemistry Learning , 2012 .

[15]  Joseph P. Apkan Which Comes First: Computer Simulation of Dissection or a Traditional Laboratory Practical Method of Dissection , 2002 .

[16]  Franz X. Bogner,et al.  Cognitive Achievement and Motivation in Hands‐on and Teacher‐Centred Science Classes: Does an additional hands‐on consolidation phase (concept mapping) optimise cognitive learning at work stations? , 2010 .

[17]  June Lee,et al.  Effectiveness of Computer-Based Instructional Simulation: A Meta Analysis. , 1999 .

[18]  Emily B. Moore,et al.  Interactive simulations as implicit support for guided-inquiry , 2013 .

[19]  Nicola J. Gibbons,et al.  Computer simulations improve university instructional laboratories. , 2004, Cell biology education.

[20]  Jerry Wellington,et al.  America's lab report: Investigations in high school science , 2007 .

[21]  N. Cowan What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory? , 2008, Progress in brain research.

[22]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Spatial Learning and Computer Simulations in Science , 2009 .

[23]  David Gibson,et al.  Games And Simulations in Online Learning: Research and Development Frameworks , 2006 .

[24]  Deanna L. Auberry,et al.  Evaluating computer lab modules for large biology courses , 1997 .

[25]  Mwangi Ndirangu,et al.  Effectiveness of a Computer-Mediated Simulations Program in School Biology on Pupils' Learning Outcomes in Cell Theory , 2004 .

[26]  Luli Stern,et al.  The Effect of a Computerized Simulation on Middle School Students’ Understanding of the Kinetic Molecular Theory , 2008 .

[27]  Jeffrey M. Kenton,et al.  Preinstructional simulations: implications for science classroom teaching , 2000 .

[28]  Katherine K. Perkins,et al.  AIP Conference Proceedings: Correlating Student Beliefs With Student Learning Using The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey , 2005 .

[29]  F. Lateef Simulation-based learning: Just like the real thing , 2010, Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shock.

[30]  Z. C. Zacharia,et al.  Comparing and combining real and virtual experimentation: an effort to enhance students' conceptual understanding of electric circuits , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[31]  Karsten Stegmann,et al.  Vicarious learning during simulations: is it more effective than hands‐on training? , 2012, Medical education.