#naorobot: exploring Nao discourse on Twitter

The Nao robot from Aldebaran Robotics is a fairly popular humanoid robot. In this study, we aimed to conduct a discourse analysis around the Nao through content analysis of posts on Twitter (N=235 tweets in English). The analysis aimed to understand discourse around the robot, the usage trends of the robot, the existence of social relationships between user and robot and if there were any patterns in tweeting. Our main results show that the Nao is attributed with high anthropomorphism and social rapport and the popular usages of the robot extend to research and education but not to health and domestic applications. In conclusion, we speculate on our results obtained and present a direction for future research.

[1]  J. Bean,et al.  Academic Output and Social Media: A Marriage of Opposites. , 2016, World neurosurgery.

[2]  Zeynep Tufekci,et al.  Big Questions for Social Media Big Data: Representativeness, Validity and Other Methodological Pitfalls , 2014, ICWSM.

[3]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Anthropomorphic language in online forums about Roomba, AIBO and the iPad , 2012, 2012 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO).

[4]  Chi-Wing Fu,et al.  Using Social Media Platforms for Human-Robot Interaction in Domestic Environment , 2014, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[5]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Hardware companions?: what online AIBO discussion forums reveal about the human-robotic relationship , 2003, CHI '03.

[6]  Ehud Sharlin,et al.  Evaluating Human-Robot Interaction , 2011, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[7]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[8]  Eric W. T. Ngai,et al.  Social media research: Theories, constructs, and conceptual frameworks , 2015, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[9]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[10]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  A survey of socially interactive robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[11]  Bernard J. Jansen,et al.  Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Norman Makoto Su,et al.  Mundanely miraculous: the robot in healthcare , 2014, NordiCHI.

[13]  Virgílio A. F. Almeida,et al.  Of Pins and Tweets: Investigating How Users Behave Across Image- and Text-Based Social Networks , 2014, ICWSM.

[14]  Morten Fjeld,et al.  Using Video Preferences to Understand the Human Perception of Real and Fictional Robots , 2015, HAI.

[15]  Rodolphe Gelin.  Robotics supporting autonomy. 5th French Japanese Conference on Bio-ethics. , 2013, Journal international de bioethique = International journal of bioethics.

[16]  Suzan Burton,et al.  Marketing With Twitter: Challenges and Opportunities , 2015 .

[17]  Janée N. Burkhalter,et al.  Maximizing Commerce and Marketing Strategies through Micro-Blogging , 2015 .

[18]  Laurel D. Riek,et al.  Wizard of Oz studies in HRI , 2012, J. Hum. Robot Interact..

[19]  Reeva Lederman,et al.  It feels different from real life: Users' Opinions of Mobile Applications for Mental Health , 2015, OZCHI.

[20]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Social robots and virtual agents as lecturers for video instruction , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[21]  Shrikanth S. Narayanan,et al.  A System for Real-time Twitter Sentiment Analysis of 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Cycle , 2012, ACL.

[22]  Susan Fournier,et al.  Being a Likable Braggart: How Consumers Use Brand Mentions for Self-Presentation on Social Media , 2015 .

[23]  Ari Rappoport,et al.  What's in a hashtag?: content based prediction of the spread of ideas in microblogging communities , 2012, WSDM '12.