Benchmark tools for evaluating AGVs at industrial environments

The paper addresses the problem of evaluating AGVs with different degrees of autonomy by defining benchmark tools to grade the performance of each approach. Based on the proposed benchmark, different experiments have been performed from manual driving to autonomous navigation, at different velocities and a scenario containing wide and narrow corridors, small and large isles, rooms, slalom-like parts requiring zig-zag maneuvering and static objects. However, this benchmark is also applicable to dynamic environments, including moving objects and other vehicles. In particular, experiments have been used for evaluating the performance of AGVs, in terms of robustness, efficiency, safety and comfortability. The underlying objective is to evaluate the potential advantages of manual-assisted driving as well as autonomous navigation against standard manual driving. To obtain valid and significant results, more than 180 experiments have been carried out on each approach.

[1]  Florent Lamiraux,et al.  Metric-based iterative closest point scan matching for sensor displacement estimation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[2]  J. A. Valencia,et al.  Evaluation of navigation of an autonomous mobile robot , 2007 .

[3]  Workspaces The Obstacle-Restriction Method ( ORM ) for Reactive Obstacle Avoidance in Difficult Scenarios in Three-Dimensional , 2006 .

[4]  Iwan Ulrich,et al.  VFH+: reliable obstacle avoidance for fast mobile robots , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[5]  Jwu-Sheng Hu,et al.  Self-Tuning Nearness Diagram Navigation , 2009 .

[6]  Iwan Ulrich,et al.  VFH/sup */: local obstacle avoidance with look-ahead verification , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[7]  Kristie Lee Young,et al.  Intelligent Speed Adaptation: A Review , 2002 .

[8]  M.C. Mora,et al.  Factory management and transport automation , 2003, EFTA 2003. 2003 IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation. Proceedings (Cat. No.03TH8696).

[9]  Bruce H. Krogh,et al.  Integrated path planning and dynamic steering control for autonomous vehicles , 1986, Proceedings. 1986 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[10]  Josep Tornero,et al.  Supervisión, Teleoperación y Navegación de Vehículos Industriales y su Integración en el Sistema de Gestión , 2010 .

[11]  Theodore O. Grosch Radar sensors for automotive collision warning and avoidance , 1995, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[12]  Leopoldo Armesto,et al.  Automation of industrial vehicles: A vision-based line tracking application , 2009, 2009 IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation.

[13]  Göran Nilsson,et al.  Traffic Safety Dimensions and the Power Model to Describe the Effect of Speed on Safety , 2004 .

[14]  Wang Zheng-bo Vehicle stability control system based on Fuzzy-PI , 2009 .

[15]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  Elastic bands: connecting path planning and control , 1993, [1993] Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[16]  Dieter Fox,et al.  Adapting the Sample Size in Particle Filters Through KLD-Sampling , 2003, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[17]  Leopoldo Armesto,et al.  PISALA project. Intelligent Sensorization for Line tracking with Artificial Vision , 2010, ISR/ROBOTIK.

[18]  L. Raffaelli,et al.  A low cost 77 GHz monolithic transmitter for automotive collision avoidance systems , 1993, IEEE 1993 Microwave and Millimeter-Wave Monolithic Circuits Symposium Digest of Papers.

[19]  O. Khatib,et al.  Real-Time Obstacle Avoidance for Manipulators and Mobile Robots , 1985, Proceedings. 1985 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[20]  Javier Minguez,et al.  Nearness diagram (ND) navigation: collision avoidance in troublesome scenarios , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation.

[21]  P. Sanz,et al.  Fuzzy Logic Wall Following of a Mobile Robot Based on the Concept of General Perception , 1995 .

[22]  Yoram Koren,et al.  The vector field histogram-fast obstacle avoidance for mobile robots , 1991, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[23]  Francesco Bullo,et al.  Smooth Nearness-Diagram Navigation , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[24]  Yoram Koren,et al.  Real-time obstacle avoidance for fast mobile robots in cluttered environments , 1990, Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[25]  Robert B. Tilove,et al.  Local obstacle avoidance for mobile robots based on the method of artificial potentials , 1990, Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[26]  Javier Minguez,et al.  Global nearness diagram navigation (GND) , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[27]  Aníbal Ollero,et al.  Intelligent Mobile Robot Navigation , 2005, Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics.

[28]  Alberto Elfes,et al.  Using occupancy grids for mobile robot perception and navigation , 1989, Computer.

[29]  뵈커위르겐,et al.  Lane-change assistant for motor vehicles , 2002 .

[30]  Reid G. Simmons,et al.  The curvature-velocity method for local obstacle avoidance , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[31]  Leopoldo Armesto,et al.  Collision Avoidance Systems for Manual-assisted Driving , 2010, ISR/ROBOTIK.

[32]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  The dynamic window approach to collision avoidance , 1997, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[33]  Yoram Koren,et al.  Potential field methods and their inherent limitations for mobile robot navigation , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.