Predicting Romantic Interest at Zero Acquaintance: Evidence of Sex Differences in Trait Perception but Not in Predictors of Interest
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] C. Black. The life history narrative: How early events and psychological processes relate to biodemographic measures of life history , 2016 .
[2] Vincent Egan,et al. Positive assortative pairing in social and romantic partners: A cross-cultural observational field study of naturally occurring pairs , 2015 .
[3] P. Komesaroff,et al. Obese Adults’ Perceptions of News Reporting on Obesity , 2015 .
[4] C. Dunkel,et al. Using the California Q-sort Measure of Life History Strategy to Predict Sexual Behavioral Outcomes , 2015, Archives of sexual behavior.
[5] E. Chagnon,et al. Do Men and Women Exhibit Different Preferences for Mates? A Replication of Eastwick and Finkel (2008) , 2015 .
[6] Paul W. Eastwick,et al. Best research practices in psychology: Illustrating epistemological and pragmatic considerations with the case of relationship science. , 2015, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[7] J. P. Rushton,et al. The psychometric assessment of human life history strategy: A meta-analytic construct validation. , 2014 .
[8] B. Karney,et al. Men still value physical attractiveness in a long-term mate more than women: rejoinder to Eastwick, Neff, Finkel, Luchies, and Hunt (2014). , 2014, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[9] Andrea L. Meltzer,et al. Sex differences in the implications of partner physical attractiveness for the trajectory of marital satisfaction. , 2014, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[10] G. Fletcher,et al. Predicting Romantic Interest and Decisions in the Very Early Stages of Mate Selection , 2014, Personality & social psychology bulletin.
[11] A. Figueredo,et al. Comparison of life history strategy measures , 2014 .
[12] Paul W. Eastwick,et al. The predictive validity of ideal partner preferences: a review and meta-analysis. , 2014, Psychological bulletin.
[13] G. Fletcher,et al. Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection. , 2013, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[14] Paul W. Eastwick,et al. Perceived, not actual, similarity predicts initial attraction in a live romantic context: Evidence from the speed-dating paradigm , 2013 .
[15] R. Eisinga,et al. The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown? , 2013, International Journal of Public Health.
[16] U. Schimmack. The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles. , 2012, Psychological methods.
[17] C. Copen,et al. First marriages in the United States: data from the 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth. , 2012, National health statistics reports.
[18] Peter Harms,et al. An evaluation of the consequences of using short measures of the Big Five personality traits. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[19] A. Figueredo,et al. Shared life history strategy as a strong predictor of romantic relationship satisfaction , 2012 .
[20] Y. Pawitan,et al. Heritability, Assortative Mating and Gender Differences in Violent Crime: Results from a Total Population Sample Using Twin, Adoption, and Sibling Models , 2011, Behavior Genetics.
[21] P. Westfall,et al. Multiple comparisons and multiple tests using SAS , 2011 .
[22] Aurelio José Figueredo,et al. Intentions Towards Infidelity Scale , 2010 .
[23] A. Figueredo,et al. Life history strategy as a longitudinal predictor of relationship satisfaction and dissolution , 2010 .
[24] G. Fletcher,et al. Through the eyes of love: reality and illusion in intimate relationships. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.
[25] Eric D. Heggestad,et al. Erratum to: Polynomial Regression with Response Surface Analysis: A Powerful Approach for Examining Moderation and Overcoming Limitations of Difference Scores , 2010 .
[26] J. Nijenhuis,et al. The General Factor of Personality: A meta-analysis of Big Five intercorrelations and a criterion-related validity study , 2010 .
[27] Dan Ariely,et al. What makes you click?—Mate preferences in online dating , 2010 .
[28] C. Dunkel,et al. Convergent validity of measures of life-history strategy , 2010 .
[29] D. A. Kenny,et al. Similarity and Agreement in Self-and Other Perception: A Meta-Analysis , 2010, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.
[30] Eric D. Heggestad,et al. Polynomial Regression with Response Surface Analysis: A Powerful Approach for Examining Moderation and Overcoming Limitations of Difference Scores , 2010 .
[31] S. McHale,et al. Longitudinal predictors of change in number of sexual partners across adolescence and early adulthood. , 2010, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.
[32] B. Holmes,et al. Adult attachment and romantic partner preference: A review , 2009 .
[33] A. Furnham. Sex differences in mate selection preferences , 2009 .
[34] Aurelio José Figueredo,et al. Assortative Pairing and Life History Strategy , 2009 .
[35] Guangjian Zhang,et al. What leads to romantic attraction: similarity, reciprocity, security, or beauty? Evidence from a speed-dating study. , 2009, Journal of personality.
[36] S. Craig Roberts,et al. MHC-correlated mate choice in humans: A review , 2009, Psychoneuroendocrinology.
[37] A. Figueredo,et al. Predicting romantic relationship satisfaction from life history strategy , 2009 .
[38] J. Maner,et al. A sharp eye for her SOI: perception and misperception of female sociosexuality at zero acquaintance , 2009 .
[39] Aurelio José Figueredo,et al. Assortative Pairing and Life History Strategy A Cross-Cultural Study , 2009 .
[40] R. Horton,et al. Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity , 2008 .
[41] P. Donnelly,et al. Is Mate Choice in Humans MHC-Dependent? , 2008, PLoS genetics.
[42] S. Kennedy,et al. FtsK-Dependent Dimer Resolution on Multiple Chromosomes in the Pathogen Vibrio cholerae , 2008, PLoS genetics.
[43] Richard Arum,et al. The romance of college attendance: Higher education stratification and mate selection ☆ , 2008 .
[44] Paul W. Eastwick,et al. Sex Differences in Mate Preferences Revisited : Do People Know What They Initially Desire in a Romantic Partner ? , 2008 .
[45] D. Annis. Dyadic Data Analysis , 2007 .
[46] D. A. Kenny,et al. Accuracy in Judgments of Aggressiveness , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.
[47] Kathleen D. Vohs,et al. Encyclopedia of social psychology , 2007 .
[48] Daniel N. Jones,et al. The Ideal Romantic Partner Personality , 2006 .
[49] W. J. Jacobs,et al. Consilience and Life History Theory: From Genes to Brain to Reproductive Strategy. , 2006 .
[50] Daniel J. Bauer,et al. Testing and probing interactions in hierarchical linear growth models , 2006 .
[51] D. Kenrick,et al. Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: what, whether, and why. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[52] Shanhong Luo,et al. Assortative mating and marital quality in newlyweds: a couple-centered approach. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[53] D. Watson,et al. Match makers and deal breakers: analyses of assortative mating in newlywed couples. , 2004, Journal of personality.
[54] A. Figueredo,et al. The heritability of life history strategy: The k‐factor, covitality, and personality , 2004, Social biology.
[55] D. A. Kenny,et al. PERSON: A General Model of Interpersonal Perception , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.
[56] Jerlando F. L. Jackson,et al. The Declining "Equity" of American Higher Education , 2004 .
[57] D. White. Influences of social learning on mate-choice decisions , 2004, Learning & behavior.
[58] R. Wootton. The evolution of life histories: Theory and analysis , 1993, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.
[59] C. Sedikides,et al. Pancultural Self-Enhancement , 2002 .
[60] S. Gosling,et al. A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains , 2003 .
[61] Shanhong Luo,et al. Interpersonal attraction and personality: what is attractive--self similarity, ideal similarity, complementarity or attachment security? , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[62] R. Thornhill,et al. Major histocompatibility complex genes, symmetry, and body scent attractiveness in men and women , 2003 .
[63] Daniel E. Martin,et al. Traffic crash involvement: experiential driving knowledge and stressful contextual antecedents. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.
[64] W. J. Jacobs,et al. Self, friends, and lovers: structural relations among Beck Depression Inventory scores and perceived mate values. , 2003, Journal of affective disorders.
[65] B. Buunk,et al. Age and gender differences in mate selection criteria for various involvement levels , 2002 .
[66] David Thissen,et al. Quick and Easy Implementation of the Benjamini-Hochberg Procedure for Controlling the False Positive Rate in Multiple Comparisons , 2002 .
[67] P. Salovey,et al. Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) Users Manual , 2002 .
[68] Michael C. Bailey,et al. The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: testing the tradeoffs. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[69] D. Perrett,et al. Facial symmetry and judgements of apparent health: Support for a “good genes” explanation of the attractiveness–symmetry relationship , 2001 .
[70] K. Grammer,et al. Male facial attractiveness: evidence for hormone-mediated adaptive design , 2001 .
[71] H. Flap,et al. Assortative Meeting and Mating: Unintended Consequences of Organized Settings for Partner Choices , 2001 .
[72] D. Buss,et al. A Half Century of Mate Preferences: The Cultural Evolution of Values , 2001 .
[73] Michael Domjan,et al. The Psychology of Being " Right " : The Problem of Accuracy in Social Perception and Cognition , 2001 .
[74] J. Simpson,et al. The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[75] D. Watson,et al. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Self-other Agreement in Personality and Affectivity: the Role of Acquaintanceship, Trait Visibility, and Assumed Similarity , 2022 .
[76] Tom A. B. Snijders,et al. The social relations model for family data: A multilevel approach , 1999 .
[77] W. Potts,et al. The Evolution of Mating Preferences and Major Histocompatibility Complex Genes , 1999, The American Naturalist.
[78] S. Sprecher. Insiders' Perspectives on Reasons for Attraction to a Close Other , 1998 .
[79] C. M. Davis,et al. Handbook of Sexuality-Related Measures , 1998 .
[80] N. Malamuth. An evolutionary-based model integrating research on the characteristics of sexually coercive men. , 1998 .
[81] A. Figueredo,et al. Mating-effort in adolescence : A conditional or alternative strategy , 1997 .
[82] Donn Byrne,et al. An Overview (and Underview) of Research and Theory within the Attraction Paradigm , 1997 .
[83] R. K. Young,et al. Mate assortment in dating and married couples , 1996 .
[84] D. Funder. On the accuracy of personality judgment: a realistic approach. , 1995, Psychological review.
[85] D. Watson,et al. Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development , 1995 .
[86] Y. Benjamini,et al. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .
[87] J. Edwards. The Study of Congruence in Organizational Behavior Research: Critique and a Proposed Alternative , 1994 .
[88] B. Muthén,et al. Multilevel Covariance Structure Analysis , 1994 .
[89] P. Borkenau,et al. Convergence of stranger ratings of personality and intelligence with self-ratings, partner ratings, and measured intelligence. , 1993 .
[90] D. Singh,et al. Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[91] D. Buss,et al. Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. , 1993, Psychological review.
[92] Gilbert A. Churchill,et al. Caution in the Use of Difference Scores in Consumer Research , 1993 .
[93] Jacob Cohen,et al. A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.
[94] D. A. Kenny,et al. Consensus at zero acquaintance: replication, behavioral cues, and stability. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[95] P. Costa,et al. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO-Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) , 1992 .
[96] J. Belsky,et al. Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: and evolutionary theory of socialization. , 1991, Child development.
[97] J. Simpson,et al. Individual differences in sociosexuality: evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[98] Alan Feingold,et al. Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: A comparison across five research paradigms. , 1990 .
[99] Gary D. Levy,et al. Effects of Potential Partners' Costume and Physical Attractiveness on Sexuality and Partner Selection , 1990 .
[100] J. Townsend,et al. Effects of potential partners' physical attractiveness and socioeconomic status on sexuality and partner selection , 1990, Archives of sexual behavior.
[101] Jeffry A. Simpson,et al. Perception of physical attractiveness: Mechanisms involved in the maintenance of romantic relationships. , 1990 .
[102] P. Lachenbruch. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .
[103] J. P. Rushton,et al. Genetic similarity, human altruism, and group selection , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[104] D. Buss,et al. Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[105] A. Feingold. Matching for attractiveness in romantic partners and same-sex friends: A meta-analysis and theoretical critique. , 1988 .
[106] D. A. Kenny,et al. Consensus in personality judgments at zero acquaintance. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[107] S. G. Vandenberg,et al. Assortative mating for IQ and personality due to propinquity and personal preference , 1988, Behavior genetics.
[108] D. A. Kenny,et al. Interpersonal Perception: A Social Relations Analysis , 1988 .
[109] A. Aron,et al. Love and the expansion of self: Understanding attraction and satisfaction. , 1988 .
[110] D. Buss,et al. Human Mate Selection , 2020 .
[111] S. G. Vandenberg,et al. Spouse similarity in American and Swedish couples , 1980, Behavior genetics.
[112] R. J. Robertson,et al. Offspring Quality and the Polygyny Threshold: "The Sexy Son Hypothesis" , 1979, The American Naturalist.
[113] Timothy D. Wilson,et al. The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. , 1977 .
[114] M. Snyder. Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. , 1974 .
[115] S. G. Vandenberg. Assortative mating, or who marries whom? , 1972 .
[116] R. Trivers. Parental investment and sexual selection , 1972 .
[117] G. William Walster,et al. Physical attractiveness and dating choice: A test of the matching hypothesis☆ , 1971 .
[118] R. Winch. Another Look at the Theory of Complementary Needs in Mate-Selection , 1967 .
[119] E. Walster,et al. Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[120] D. Byrne,et al. ATTRACTION AS A LINEAR FUNCTION OF PROPORTION OF POSITIVE REINFORCEMENTS. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[121] T. C. Chamberlin. The Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses: With this method the dangers of parental affection for a favorite theory can be circumvented. , 1965, Science.
[122] R. Winch. The Theory of Complementary Needs in Mate-Selection: A Test of One Kind of Complementariness , 1955 .
[123] E. Brunswik,et al. Ecological cue-validity of proximity and of other Gestalt factors. , 1953, The American journal of psychology.
[124] P. Samuelson. A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer's Behaviour , 1938 .
[125] T. C. Chamberlin. The Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses , 1931, The Journal of Geology.
[126] R. Punnett,et al. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1930, Nature.