Sparse representation of global features of visual images in human primary visual cortex: Evidence from fMRI

In fMRI experiments on object representation in visual cortex, we designed two types of stimuli: one is the gray face image and its line drawing, and the other is the illusion and its corresponding completed illusion. Both of them have the same global features with different minute details so that the results of fMRI experiments can be compared with each other. The first kind of visual stimuli was used in a block design fMRI experiment, and the second was used in an event-related fMRI experiment. Comparing and analyzing interesting visual cortex activity patterns and blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD)-fMRI signal, we obtained results to show some invariance of global features of visual images. A plausible explanation about the invariant mechanism is related with the cooperation of synchronized response to the global features of the visual image with a feedback of shape perception from higher cortex to cortex V1, namely the integration of global features and embodiment of sparse representation and distributed population code.

[1]  David J. Field,et al.  How Close Are We to Understanding V1? , 2005, Neural Computation.

[2]  Tim Gollisch,et al.  Modeling Single-Neuron Dynamics and Computations: A Balance of Detail and Abstraction , 2006, Science.

[3]  Charles E Connor,et al.  Underlying principles of visual shape selectivity in posterior inferotemporal cortex , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  Kenji Kawano,et al.  Global and fine information coded by single neurons in the temporal visual cortex , 1999, Nature.

[5]  M. Young,et al.  Sparse population coding of faces in the inferotemporal cortex. , 1992, Science.

[6]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural image statistics and neural representation. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[7]  Paul Schrater,et al.  Shape perception reduces activity in human primary visual cortex , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Charles E. Connor.  Neuroscience: Friends and grandmothers , 2005, Nature.

[9]  Nicole C. Rust,et al.  Do We Know What the Early Visual System Does? , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  W. Singer,et al.  Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties , 1989, Nature.

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Human Brain Function , 1997 .

[12]  R. O’Reilly.  Biologically Based Computational Models of High-Level Cognition , 2006, Science.

[13]  David J. Field,et al.  Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images , 1996, Nature.

[14]  J. Nicholls.  From neuron to brain , 1976 .

[15]  T. Nick,et al.  Synaptic activity modulates presynaptic excitability , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  Peter Földiák,et al.  SPARSE CODING IN THE PRIMATE CORTEX , 2002 .

[17]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  The handbook of brain theory and neural networks , 1995, A Bradford book.

[18]  D. Ruderman,et al.  Independent component analysis of natural image sequences yields spatio-temporal filters similar to simple cells in primary visual cortex , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  T. Poggio,et al.  Are Cortical Models Really Bound by the “Binding Problem”? , 1999, Neuron.

[20]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Wavelets for a vision , 1996, Proc. IEEE.

[21]  J L Gallant,et al.  Sparse coding and decorrelation in primary visual cortex during natural vision. , 2000, Science.

[22]  David J. Field,et al.  What is the other 85% of V1 doing? , 2004 .

[23]  Laurent Perrinet,et al.  On efficient sparse spike coding schemes for learning natural scenes in the primary visual cortex , 2007, BMC Neuroscience.

[24]  J. Gallant,et al.  Natural Stimulation of the Nonclassical Receptive Field Increases Information Transmission Efficiency in V1 , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Bruno A. Olshausen,et al.  Principles of Image Representation in Visual Cortex , 2003 .

[26]  D. Heeger,et al.  In this issue , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[27]  Leila Reddy,et al.  Coding of visual objects in the ventral stream , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[28]  C. Koch,et al.  Invariant visual representation by single neurons in the human brain , 2005, Nature.

[29]  Julie E. Boland,et al.  Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  A two-layer sparse coding model learns simple and complex cell receptive fields and topography from natural images , 2001, Vision Research.

[31]  Bruno A Olshausen,et al.  Sparse coding of sensory inputs , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[32]  David Marr,et al.  VISION A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information , 2009 .

[33]  Karl J. Friston.  Experimental Design and Statistical Parametric Mapping , 2003 .

[34]  Kewei Chen,et al.  Arithmetic processing in the brain shaped by cultures. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[36]  W. Singer,et al.  Temporal coding in the visual cortex: new vistas on integration in the nervous system , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.