Brain responses strongly correlate with Weibull image statistics when processing natural images
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] G. Rousselet,et al. Parametric study of EEG sensitivity to phase noise during face processing , 2008, BMC Neuroscience.
[2] W. Geisler. Visual perception and the statistical properties of natural scenes. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.
[3] E. Adelson,et al. Image statistics and the perception of surface qualities , 2007, Nature.
[4] Victor A. F. Lamme,et al. The influence of inattention on the neural correlates of scene segmentation , 2006, Brain Research.
[5] R. Millane,et al. Effects of occlusion, edges, and scaling on the power spectra of natural images. , 2005, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[6] Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al. Low-Level Image Cues in the Perception of Translucent Materials , 2005, TAP.
[7] Arnold W. M. Smeulders,et al. c ○ 2005 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. Manufactured in The Netherlands. A Six-Stimulus Theory for Stochastic Texture , 2002 .
[8] Mary M. Conte,et al. Interaction of luminance and higher-order statistics in texture discrimination , 2005, Vision Research.
[9] Paul Over,et al. Multimedia retrieval benchmarks , 2004, IEEE MultiMedia.
[10] S. Thorpe,et al. A Limit to the Speed of Processing in Ultra-Rapid Visual Categorization of Novel Natural Scenes , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[11] M. Thomson. Beats, kurtosis and visual coding , 2001, Network.
[12] Eero P. Simoncelli. Modeling the joint statistics of images in the wavelet domain , 1999, Optics & Photonics.
[13] J. Bert Keats,et al. Statistical Methods for Reliability Data , 1999 .
[14] J. Nadal,et al. Self-Similarity Properties of Natural Images Resemble Those of Turbulent Flows , 1998, cond-mat/0107314.
[15] A. Oliva,et al. Coarse Blobs or Fine Edges? Evidence That Information Diagnosticity Changes the Perception of Complex Visual Stimuli , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.
[16] William Bialek,et al. Statistics of Natural Images: Scaling in the Woods , 1993, NIPS.
[17] Petre Stoica,et al. MUSIC, maximum likelihood, and Cramer-Rao bound , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.
[18] D J Field,et al. Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[19] C. Enroth-Cugell,et al. The receptive‐field spatial structure of cat retinal Y cells. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.
[20] Benoit B. Mandelbrot,et al. Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .
[21] K. Chung,et al. Limit Distributions for Sums of Independent Random Variables , 1955 .
[22] J. Koenderink. The structure of images , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.
[23] A. Smeulders,et al. A Physical Explanation for Natural Image Statistics , 2002 .
[24] D. Tolhurst,et al. The human visual system is optimised for processing the spatial information in natural visual images , 2000, Current Biology.
[25] L. Croner,et al. Receptive fields of P and M ganglion cells across the primate retina , 1995, Vision Research.
[26] D. Hubel,et al. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.
[27] E. Brunswik,et al. Ecological cue-validity of proximity and of other Gestalt factors. , 1953, The American journal of psychology.