Self-Adaptation-Based Dynamic Coalition Formation in a Distributed Agent Network: A Mechanism and a Brief Survey

In some real systems, e.g., distributed sensor networks, individual agents often need to form coalitions to accomplish complex tasks. Due to communication and computation constraints, it is infeasible for agents to directly interact with all other agents to form coalitions. Most previous coalition formation studies, however, overlooked this aspect. Those studies did not provide an explicitly modeled agent network or assumed that agents were in a fully connected network, where an agent can directly communicate with all other agents. Thus, to alleviate this problem, it is necessary to provide a neighborhood network structure, within which agents can directly interact only with their neighbors. Toward this end, in this paper, a self-adaptation-based dynamic coalition formation mechanism is proposed. The proposed mechanism operates in a neighborhood agent network. Based on self-adaptation principles, this mechanism enables agents to dynamically adjust their degrees of involvement in multiple coalitions and to join new coalitions at any time. The self-adaptation process, i.e., agents adjusting their degrees of involvement in multiple coalitions, is realized by exploiting a negotiation protocol. The proposed mechanism is evaluated through a comparison with a centralized mechanism (CM) and three other coalition formation mechanisms. Experimental results demonstrate the good performance of the proposed mechanism in terms of the entire network profit and time consumption. Additionally, a brief survey of current coalition formation research is also provided. From this survey, readers can have a general understanding of the focuses and progress of current research. This survey provides a classification of the primary emphasis of each related work in coalition formation, so readers can conveniently find the most related studies.

[1]  J. Dall,et al.  Random geometric graphs. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[2]  Jean-Pierre Aubin,et al.  Cooperative Fuzzy Games , 1981, Math. Oper. Res..

[3]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Distributed Sensor Networks , 2003, Multiagent Systems, Artificial Societies, and Simulated Organizations.

[4]  Kwang Mong Sim,et al.  Agent-Based Cloud Computing , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Services Computing.

[5]  Marie-Pierre Gleizes,et al.  Self-Organisation and Emergence in MAS: An Overview , 2006, Informatica.

[6]  Claudia V. Goldman,et al.  Self-organization through bottom-up coalition formation , 2003, AAMAS '03.

[7]  Paul Scerri,et al.  Agent Organized Networks Redux , 2008, AAAI.

[8]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents , 1998, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[9]  Marie desJardins,et al.  Agent-organized networks for dynamic team formation , 2005, AAMAS '05.

[10]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Methods for Task Allocation via Agent Coalition Formation , 1998, Artif. Intell..

[11]  Bo An,et al.  Automated negotiation with decommitment for dynamic resource allocation in cloud computing , 2010, AAMAS.

[12]  Sarvapali D. Ramchurn,et al.  Coalition formation with spatial and temporal constraints , 2010, AAMAS.

[13]  Bo An,et al.  Strategic agents for multi-resource negotiation , 2011, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[14]  Sarvapali D. Ramchurn,et al.  An Anytime Algorithm for Optimal Coalition Structure Generation , 2014, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[15]  Bo An,et al.  Negotiation over decommitment penalty , 2011, AAMAS.

[16]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  A distributed algorithm for anytime coalition structure generation , 2010, AAMAS.

[17]  Régis Vincent,et al.  Task inference and distributed task management in the Centibots robotic system , 2005, AAMAS '05.

[18]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Distributed Sensor Networks: A Multiagent Perspective , 2003 .

[19]  Marie desJardins,et al.  THE EFFECT OF NETWORK STRUCTURE ON DYNAMIC TEAM FORMATION IN MULTI‐AGENT SYSTEMS , 2008, Comput. Intell..

[20]  David P. Stone An Autonomous Agent for Supply Chain Management , 2007 .

[21]  A. Rubinstein Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model , 1982 .

[22]  J. Stringer,et al.  Operational Research for “Multi-organizations” , 1967 .

[23]  Mathew D. Penrose,et al.  Random Geometric Graphs , 2003 .

[24]  Subhash Saini,et al.  ARMS: An agent-based resource management system for grid computing , 2002, Sci. Program..