A systemic analysis of the ideas immanent in neuromodulation

This thesis focuses on the phenomena of neuromodulation — these are a set of diffuse chemical pathways that modify the properties of neurons and act in concert with the more traditional pathways mediated by synapses (neurotransmission). There is a growing opinion within neuroscience that such processes constitute a radical challenge to the centrality of neurotransmission in our understanding of the nervous system. This thesis is an attempt to understand how the idea of neuromodulation should impact on the canonical ideas of information processing in the nervous system. The first goal of this thesis has been to systematise the ideas immanent in neuromodulation such that they are amenable to investigation through both simulation and analytical techniques. Specifically, the physiological properties of neuromodulation are distinct from those traditionally associated with neurotransmission. Hence, a first contribution has been to develop a principled but minimal mechanistic description of neuromodulation. Furthermore, neuromodulators are thought to underpin a distinct set of functional roles. Hence, a second contribution has been to define these in terms of a set of dynami- cal motifs. Subsequently the major goal of thesis has been to investigate the relationship between the mechanistic properties of neuromodulation and their dynamical motifs in order to understand whether the physiological properties of neuromodulation predispose them toward their functional roles? This thesis uses both simulation and analytical techniques to explore this question. The most significant progress, however, is made through the application of dynamical systems analysis. These results demonstrate that there is a strong relationship between the mechanistic and dynamical abstractions of neuromodulation developed in this thesis. In particular they suggest that in contrast to neurotransmission, neuromodulatory pathways are predisposed toward bifurcating a system’s dynamics. Consequently, this thesis argues that a true canonical picture of the dynamics of the nervous system requires an appreciation of the interplay between the properties of neurotransmission and the properties immanent in the idea of neuromodulation.

[1]  J. Ripperger,et al.  The rhythms of life , 2007, Genome Biology.

[2]  Jason Noble,et al.  Homeostatic plasticity improves signal propagation in continuous-time recurrent neural networks , 2007, Biosyst..

[3]  Eugene M. Izhikevich,et al.  Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience: The Geometry of Excitability and Bursting , 2006 .

[4]  E. Marder,et al.  Variability, compensation and homeostasis in neuron and network function , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[5]  O. Sporns Small-world connectivity, motif composition, and complexity of fractal neuronal connections. , 2006, Bio Systems.

[6]  Hywel Thomas Parker Williams,et al.  Homeostatic adaptive networks , 2006 .

[7]  Jordan B. Pollack,et al.  Modular Interdependency in Complex Dynamical Systems , 2005, Artificial Life.

[8]  Eugene M. Izhikevich,et al.  Which model to use for cortical spiking neurons? , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[9]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Will a large complex system with time delays be stable? , 2004, Physical review letters.

[10]  Anil K. Seth,et al.  Environment and Behavior Influence the Complexity of Evolved Neural Networks , 2004, Adapt. Behav..

[11]  S. Sinha,et al.  Evidence of universality for the May-Wigner stability theorem for random networks with local dynamics. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[12]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Measuring information integration , 2003, BMC Neuroscience.

[13]  P. Husbands,et al.  Fast and loose: biologically inspired couplings , 2002 .

[14]  Andrew Philippides,et al.  Neuronal Plasticity and Temporal Adaptivity: GasNet Robot Control Networks , 2002, Adapt. Behav..

[15]  Eve Marder,et al.  Cellular, synaptic and network effects of neuromodulation , 2002, Neural Networks.

[16]  Inman Harvey,et al.  Evolving fixed-weight networks for learning robots , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC'02 (Cat. No.02TH8600).

[17]  M E J Newman,et al.  Community structure in social and biological networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  B. Webb,et al.  Can robots make good models of biological behaviour? , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[19]  Dario Floreano,et al.  Evolution of Plastic Control Networks , 2001, Auton. Robots.

[20]  Andrew Philippides,et al.  The Shifting Network: Volume Signalling in Real and Robot Nervous Systems , 2001, ECAL.

[21]  H. Prast,et al.  Nitric oxide as modulator of neuronal function , 2001, Progress in Neurobiology.

[22]  S. Hooper Neural Circuits: Functional Reconfiguration , 2001 .

[23]  E. Vizi,et al.  Nitric oxide: a novel link between synaptic and nonsynaptic transmission , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[24]  S H Snyder,et al.  Novel neurotransmitters and their neuropsychiatric relevance. , 2000, The American journal of psychiatry.

[25]  G Tononi,et al.  Theoretical neuroanatomy: relating anatomical and functional connectivity in graphs and cortical connection matrices. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  Reidun Ursin,et al.  Serotonin and the sleep/wake cycle: special emphasis on microdialysis studies , 2000, Progress in Neurobiology.

[27]  Christopher Costello,et al.  On an Early Result on Stability and Complexity , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[28]  R. Harris-Warrick,et al.  The evolution of neuronal circuits underlying species-specific behavior , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[29]  D. Stoljar,et al.  A neuron doctrine in the philosophy of neuroscience , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[30]  Paul S. Katz,et al.  What are we talking about? Modes of neuronal communication , 1999 .

[31]  G. Turrigiano Homeostatic plasticity in neuronal networks: the more things change, the more they stay the same , 1999, Trends in Neurosciences.

[32]  G. Edelman,et al.  Complexity and coherency: integrating information in the brain , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  Christof Koch,et al.  Biophysics of Computation: Information Processing in Single Neurons (Computational Neuroscience Series) , 1998 .

[34]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[35]  Inman Harvey,et al.  Through the Labyrinth Evolution Finds a Way: A Silicon Ridge , 1996, ICES.

[36]  Luigi F. Agnati,et al.  Wiring and volume transmission in the central nervous system: The concept of closed and open synapses , 1996, Progress in Neurobiology.

[37]  P. Katz Intrinsic and extrinsic neuromodulation of motor circuits , 1995, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[38]  Eörs Szathmáry,et al.  The Major Transitions in Evolution , 1997 .

[39]  P. Garris,et al.  Efflux of dopamine from the synaptic cleft in the nucleus accumbens of the rat brain , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[40]  G. Edelman,et al.  A measure for brain complexity: relating functional segregation and integration in the nervous system. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  S. Gueron,et al.  Mapping the dynamics of a bursting neuron. , 1993, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[42]  Yuichi Nakamura,et al.  Approximation of dynamical systems by continuous time recurrent neural networks , 1993, Neural Networks.

[43]  Hava T. Siegelmann,et al.  On the computational power of neural nets , 1992, COLT '92.

[44]  George J. Klir,et al.  Facets of Systems Science , 1991 .

[45]  G. Edelman,et al.  The NO hypothesis: possible effects of a short-lived, rapidly diffusible signal in the development and function of the nervous system. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  G. Ermentrout,et al.  Analysis of neural excitability and oscillations , 1989 .

[47]  Jordan B. Pollack,et al.  Connectionism: past, present, and future , 1989, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[48]  J. Garthwaite,et al.  Endothelium-derived relaxing factor release on activation of NMDA receptors suggests role as intercellular messenger in the brain , 1988, Nature.

[49]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[50]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  D. Marr,et al.  Artificial Intelligence - A Personal View , 1976, Artif. Intell..

[52]  MARK R. GARDNER,et al.  Connectance of Large Dynamic (Cybernetic) Systems: Critical Values for Stability , 1970, Nature.

[53]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[54]  R. FitzHugh Impulses and Physiological States in Theoretical Models of Nerve Membrane. , 1961, Biophysical journal.

[55]  F ROSENBLATT,et al.  The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. , 1958, Psychological review.

[56]  Hywel T. P. Williams,et al.  Homeostatic plasticity in recurrent neural networks , 2004 .

[57]  P. Husbands,et al.  Not measuring evolvability: initial investigation of an evolutionary robotics search space , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE Cat. No.01TH8546).

[58]  D. Heiss-Czedik An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms. , 1997, Artificial Life.

[59]  J Garthwaite,et al.  Nitric oxide signaling in the central nervous system. , 1995, Annual review of physiology.

[60]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Exploring brain functions : models in neuroscience : report of the Dahlem Workshop on Exploring Brain Functions : Models in Neuroscience, Berlin, 1991 September 29-October 4 , 1993 .

[61]  R. Harris-Warrick,et al.  Modulation of neural networks for behavior. , 1991, Annual review of neuroscience.

[62]  G Tononi,et al.  Modeling perceptual grouping and figure-ground segregation by means of active reentrant connections. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[63]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve , 1990, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[64]  P A Getting,et al.  Emerging principles governing the operation of neural networks. , 1989, Annual review of neuroscience.

[65]  L. Kaczmarek,et al.  Neuromodulation : the biochemical control of neuronal excitability , 1987 .

[66]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[67]  N. Rashevsky,et al.  Mathematical biology , 1961, Connecticut medicine.

[68]  K. Lashley The problem of serial order in behavior , 1951 .

[69]  E. Wigner Gruppentheorie und ihre Anwendung auf die Quantenmechanik der Atomspektren , 1931 .