Reassessing optimal neural population codes with neurometric functions

Cortical circuits perform the computations underlying rapid perceptual decisions within a few dozen milliseconds with each neuron emitting only a few spikes. Under these conditions, the theoretical analysis of neural population codes is challenging, as the most commonly used theoretical tool—Fisher information—can lead to erroneous conclusions about the optimality of different coding schemes. Here we revisit the effect of tuning function width and correlation structure on neural population codes based on ideal observer analysis in both a discrimination and a reconstruction task. We show that the optimal tuning function width and the optimal correlation structure in both paradigms strongly depend on the available decoding time in a very similar way. In contrast, population codes optimized for Fisher information do not depend on decoding time and are severely suboptimal when only few spikes are available. In addition, we use the neurometric functions of the ideal observer in the classification task to investigate the differential coding properties of these Fisher-optimal codes for fine and coarse discrimination. We find that the discrimination error for these codes does not decrease to zero with increasing population size, even in simple coarse discrimination tasks. Our results suggest that quite different population codes may be optimal for rapid decoding in cortical computations than those inferred from the optimization of Fisher information.

[1]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition , 1972 .

[2]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[3]  K O Johnson,et al.  Sensory discrimination: decision process. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  G. Orban,et al.  How well do response changes of striate neurons signal differences in orientation: a study in the discriminating monkey , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[5]  Alexandre Pouget,et al.  Connectionist Models of Orientation Identification , 1991 .

[6]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[7]  H Sompolinsky,et al.  Simple models for reading neuronal population codes. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Ehud Zohary,et al.  Correlated neuronal discharge rate and its implications for psychophysical performance , 1994, Nature.

[9]  Denis Fize,et al.  Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.

[10]  Haim Sompolinsky,et al.  Neural Network Models of Perceptual Learning of Angle Discrimination , 1996, Neural Computation.

[11]  D. Perrett,et al.  The `Ideal Homunculus': decoding neural population signals , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[12]  Peter Dayan,et al.  The Effect of Correlated Variability on the Accuracy of a Population Code , 1999, Neural Computation.

[13]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Neuronal Tuning: To Sharpen or Broaden? , 1999, Neural Computation.

[14]  C. Acuña,et al.  Discrimination of line orientation in humans and monkeys. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  Shigeo Abe DrEng Pattern Classification , 2001, Springer London.

[16]  H. Sompolinsky,et al.  Population coding in neuronal systems with correlated noise. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[17]  Matthias Bethge,et al.  Optimal Short-Term Population Coding: When Fisher Information Fails , 2002, Neural Computation.

[18]  W. Geisler Ideal Observer Analysis , 2002 .

[19]  Christian W. Eurich,et al.  Representational Accuracy of Stochastic Neural Populations , 2002, Neural Computation.

[20]  R. Zemel,et al.  Inference and computation with population codes. , 2003, Annual review of neuroscience.

[21]  M. Paradiso,et al.  A theory for the use of visual orientation information which exploits the columnar structure of striate cortex , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[22]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  Information in channel-coded systems: correlated receivers , 1992, Biological Cybernetics.

[23]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  Discrimination thresholds for channel-coded systems , 1992, Biological Cybernetics.

[24]  R. Shapley,et al.  Information Tuning of Populations of Neurons in Primary Visual Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  D. Butts,et al.  Tuning Curves, Neuronal Variability, and Sensory Coding , 2006, PLoS biology.

[26]  Marcelo A. Montemurro,et al.  Optimal Tuning Widths in Population Coding of Periodic Variables , 2006, Neural Computation.

[27]  Daeyeol Lee,et al.  Effects of noise correlations on information encoding and decoding. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  W. Michael Brown,et al.  Optimal Neuronal Tuning for Finite Stimulus Spaces , 2004, Neural Computation.

[29]  John R. Hershey,et al.  Approximating the Kullback Leibler Divergence Between Gaussian Mixture Models , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing - ICASSP '07.

[30]  Valentin Dragoi,et al.  Adaptive coding of visual information in neural populations , 2008, Nature.

[31]  P. Seriès,et al.  Fisher vs Shannon information in Populations of Neurons , 2008 .

[32]  M. A. Smith,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Scales of Neuronal Correlation in Primary Visual Cortex , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  Philipp Berens,et al.  CircStat: AMATLABToolbox for Circular Statistics , 2009, Journal of Statistical Software.

[34]  Alan A. Stocker,et al.  Is the Homunculus Aware of Sensory Adaptation? , 2009, Neural Computation.

[35]  Alexander S. Ecker,et al.  Neurometric function analysis of population codes , 2009, NIPS.

[36]  Eric Shea-Brown,et al.  Stimulus-Dependent Correlations and Population Codes , 2008, Neural Computation.

[37]  E. Salinas,et al.  Perceptual decision making in less than 30 milliseconds , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  M. Brecht,et al.  Sparse and powerful cortical spikes , 2010, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[39]  Alexander S. Ecker,et al.  Decorrelated Neuronal Firing in Cortical Microcircuits , 2010, Science.

[40]  Ron Meir,et al.  Error-Based Analysis of Optimal Tuning Functions Explains Phenomena Observed in Sensory Neurons , 2010, Front. Comput. Neurosci..