The use of state-of-the-art transport models by policymakers – beauty in simplicity?

Abstract Transport demand models have a long history of being a major tool in transport policy making. However, whether they are truly used in decision-making processes, and if so, whether the knowledge they provide is actually understood, is questionable. The potential contribution they can make and the importance of such models is not disputed; however, evidence shows that many issues arise with their actual use that severely limits their potential contribution. Based on case study methodology and analysis of the use of models in the transport policy processes in two countries, the UK and Israel, this paper aims to provide empirical evidence of the issues contributing to limiting the potential contribution of models and to make recommendations for better utilisation of the knowledge they can produce. The main conclusion reached is that transport models must be made simpler if they are to contribute more than they currently do to decision-making in transport policy and planning.

[1]  John Ripy,et al.  Planning, Technology, and Legitimacy: Structured Public Involvement in Integrated Transportation and Land-Use Planning in the United States , 2011 .

[2]  A. Talvitie.  The problem of trust in planning , 2012 .

[3]  Moshe Givoni,et al.  Sustainable mobility: Six research routes to steer transport policy , 2015, Nature.

[4]  Gaku Ito,et al.  From KISS to TASS Modeling: A Preliminary Analysis of the Segregation Model Incorporated with Spatial Data on Chicago , 2015, Japanese Journal of Political Science.

[5]  Nabil Amara,et al.  Climbing the Ladder of Research Utilization , 2001 .

[6]  E. Miller,et al.  Transport policy evaluation in metropolitan areas: The role of modelling in decision-making , 2009 .

[7]  Douglass B. Lee,et al.  Requiem for large-scale models , 1973, SIML.

[8]  R. Hickman,et al.  Transport futures: Thinking the unthinkable , 2013 .

[9]  Joel Freedman,et al.  Synthesis of first practices and operational research approaches in activity-based travel demand modeling , 2007 .

[10]  Robert F. Rich,et al.  Measuring knowledge utilization: Processes and outcomes , 1997 .

[11]  Luca Bertolini,et al.  Why Cost Benefit Analysis is perceived as a problematic tool for assessment of transport plans: A process perspective , 2012 .

[12]  Carey Curtis.  Integrating Land Use with Public Transport: The Use of a Discursive Accessibility Tool to Inform Metropolitan Spatial Planning in Perth , 2011 .

[13]  Steven Ney,et al.  Resolving Messy Policy Problems: Handling Conflict in Environmental, Transport, Health and Ageing Policy , 2009 .

[14]  M. R. Kerbel.  What About Us? , 2018, Remote & Controlled.

[15]  Eric J. Miller,et al.  Simulating the impacts of household travel on greenhouse gas emissions, urban air quality, and population exposure , 2011 .

[16]  M. Ben-Akiva,et al.  A practical policy-sensitive, activity-based, travel-demand model , 2011 .

[17]  David E. Boyce,et al.  Forecasting Urban Travel , 2015 .

[18]  Angela Hull,et al.  Developing a set of decision-support tools for sustainable urban transport in the UK , 2008 .

[19]  Guido Gentile,et al.  Section 7.5 - Dynamic traffic assignment with non separable link cost functions and queue spillovers , 2009 .

[20]  Benjamin Nye,et al.  What's between KISS and KIDS: A Keep It Knowledgeable (KIKS) Principle for Cognitive Agent Design , 2013, AAAI Fall Symposia.

[21]  Henrik Gudmundsson,et al.  Analysing Models as a Knowledge Technology in Transport Planning , 2011 .

[22]  T. Worsley,et al.  Transport Policy, Appraisal and Decision-Making , 2015 .

[23]  G Wickstrom,et al.  QUICK-RESPONSE URBAN TRAVEL ESTIMATION TECHNIQUES AND TRANSFERABLE PARAMETERS. USER'S GUIDE , 1978 .

[24]  Paul Schot,et al.  Bottlenecks Blocking Widespread Usage of Planning Support Systems , 2005 .

[25]  Petter Næss.  The Third Limfjord Crossing: A Case of Pessimism Bias and Knowledge Filtering , 2011 .

[26]  Ennio Cascetta,et al.  Transportation Systems Analysis , 2009 .

[27]  Douglass B. Lee.  Requiem for Large-Scale Models , 1973 .

[28]  Y. Shiftan,et al.  Travel and Emissions Analysis of Sustainable Transportation Policies with Activity-Based Modeling , 2015 .

[29]  Peter Vovsha,et al.  Extension of Activity-Based Modeling Approach to Incorporate Supply Side of Activities , 2014 .

[30]  Nabil Amara,et al.  New Evidence on Instrumental, Conceptual, and Symbolic Utilization of University Research in Government Agencies , 2004 .

[31]  Staffan Algers,et al.  The Usefulness of Transport Models in Swedish Planning Practice , 2011 .

[32]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[33]  John Preston,et al.  Historical Narrative and the Evolution of Academic Transport Studies in the UK , 2013 .

[34]  Karin Baier,et al.  Transportation Systems Analysis Models And Applications , 2016 .

[35]  Douglass B. Lee.  Retrospective on Large-Scale Urban Models , 1994 .

[36]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Combined Revealed and Stated Preference Nested Logit Access and Mode Choice Model for Multiple Mass Transit Technologies , 2001 .

[37]  Yoram Shiftan,et al.  The Advantage of Activity-based Modelling for Air-quality Purposes: Theory vs Practice and Future Needs , 2000 .

[38]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[39]  Hjp Harry Timmermans,et al.  Incorporating Traveler Response to Pricing Policies in Comprehensive Activity-Based Models of Transport Demand: Literature Review and Conceptualisation , 2011 .

[40]  Yoram Shiftan,et al.  The analysis of travel and emission impacts of travel demand management strategies using activity-based models , 2002 .

[41]  Ver Steeg Lounge.  Forecasting Urban Travel: Past, Present and Future , 2015 .

[42]  Gerald Midgley,et al.  Systems Thinking for Community Involvement in Policy Analysis , 2007 .

[43]  Peter Vovsha,et al.  Advanced activity-based models in context of planning decisions , 2006 .

[44]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  A retrospective and prospective survey of time-use research , 1999 .

[45]  L. Bertolini,et al.  The Role of Transport‐Related Models in Urban Planning Practice , 2011 .

[46]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[47]  Ângela Guimarães Pereira,et al.  From Technocratic to Participatory Decision Support Systems: Responding to the New Governance Initiatives , 2002 .

[48]  Models in policy and policy in models: integrating decision making , 2008 .

[49]  Paul Pfaffenbichler,et al.  Modelling with Systems Dynamics as a Method to Bridge the Gap between Politics, Planning and Science? Lessons Learnt from the Development of the Land Use and Transport Model MARS , 2011 .