Target selection mechanism for collision-free navigation of robots based on antennal tracking strategies of crickets

The ability to detect local moving objects and trigger avoidance behaviors is important for autonomous mobile robots in order to operate reliably in dynamic environments. Such abilities are implemented in the relatively simple brains of insects and can be investigated through behavioral experiments. Here, we investigated an ability of crickets to detect moving objects prior initiating avoidance. Crickets are tracking moving objects by antennal movements (antennal tracking), which is controlled by visual information. We hypothesized that crickets select one or two objects based on a “target selection mechanism” for the antennal tracking, because they have two antennae and therefore cannot track more than two objects simultaneously. To develop a model of the mechanism, we analyzed the antennal tracking of crickets stimulated by computer-generated images of moving objects. Our results showed that upon the simultaneous display of objects with different sizes, the larger ones are preferentially tracked by the antennae. Antennal tracking responses to large stimuli did not decrease upon repeated presentations. In addition, upon the display of a large moving object, the threshold for the subsequent initiation of avoidance behaviors declined. We interpret these results in terms of the target selection mechanism operating in the cricket visually-guided antennal tracking system that increases the efficiency of antennal tracking behavior for moving objects. An advantage of the target selection mechanism is to be able to pick out objects that should be taken into account for proper avoidance, which leads to more feasible paths or behavioral choices without increasing the number of collisions, we then finally designed a model of the mechanism for robots and implemented it to a computer-simulated mobile robot and evaluated it.

[1]  R. B. Pinter,et al.  Frequency and time domain properties of retinular cells of the desert locust (Schistocerca gregaria) and the house cricket (Acheta domesticus) , 1972, Journal of comparative physiology.

[2]  Zvi Shiller,et al.  Efficient and safe on-line motion planning in dynamic environments , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[3]  Christian Laugier,et al.  Dynamic Obstacle Avoidance in uncertain environment combining PVOs and Occupancy Grid , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[4]  R. M. Robertson,et al.  Retinal image size triggers obstacle avoidance in flying locusts , 1993, Naturwissenschaften.

[5]  Ryohei Kanzaki,et al.  Understanding and Reconstruction of the Mobiligence of Insects Employing Multiscale Biological Approaches and Robotics , 2008, Adv. Robotics.

[6]  Dinesh Manocha,et al.  Independent navigation of multiple mobile robots with hybrid reciprocal velocity obstacles , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[8]  Paolo Fiorini,et al.  Motion Planning in Dynamic Environments Using Velocity Obstacles , 1998, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[9]  Universitfit Konstanz,et al.  A Preliminary Note on a New Optomotor Response in Crickets: Antennal Tracking of Moving Targets , 1981 .

[10]  Thierry Fraichard,et al.  Collision avoidance in dynamic environments: An ICS-based solution and its comparative evaluation , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Paolo Fiorini,et al.  A robotics wheelchair for crowded public environment , 2001, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[12]  Paolo Fiorini,et al.  A Robotic Wheelchair for Crowded Public Environments MAid Combines Narrow- and Wide-Area Navigation Behaviors for Traversing Varying Environments While Retaining User Independence and Preventing Fatigue , 2001 .

[13]  Roland Siegwart,et al.  Smooth and efficient obstacle avoidance for a tour guide robot , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).

[14]  F. Gabbiani,et al.  Relationship between the Phases of Sensory and Motor Activity during a Looming-Evoked Multistage Escape Behavior , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.