This paper studies repeated partnership games with only two public signals, the game studied in Radner Myerson and Maskin(1986) except that the stage game is discrete. It is well known that the public perfect equilibrium (PPE) payoff set is bounded away from the efficient frontier in this class of game. However, it has not been unanswered how this restriction to public strategies is restrictive even in this simple class of repeated games. In this paper, I construct a strongly symmetric sequential equilibrium whose payoff dominates the best symmetric PPE payoff. The strategy used to construct this equilibrium depends not only on public signals but also on player's own past actions. I call this kind of strategy private strategy and such an equilibrium a private sequential equilibrium. I also provide an example where the private sequential equilibrium approximates the efficient outcome, but the PPE payoff set is contained in an arbitrary small neighborhood of the stage game Nash equilibrium payoff. In precise, I can find a sequence of the stage game (partnership game) where the private strategy sequential equilibrium converges to the symmetric efficient outcome and the whole PPE payoff set converges to the stage game Nash equilibrium payoff. This implies that the private sequential equilibrium payoff dominates any PPE payoff. This example suggests that the difference between a PPE payoff set and a sequential equilibrium payoff set can be potentially significant.
[1]
Drew Fudenberg,et al.
Efficiency and Observability in Games with Long-Run and Short-Run Players
,
1994
.
[2]
Jeffrey C. Ely,et al.
A Robust Folk Theorem for the Prisoner's Dilemma
,
2002,
J. Econ. Theory.
[3]
Stephen Morris,et al.
Repeated Games with Almost-Public Monitoring
,
2002,
J. Econ. Theory.
[4]
David Pearce,et al.
Information and timing in repeated partnerships
,
1991
.
[5]
D. Fudenberg,et al.
Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with Funding from Working Paper Department of Economics the Folk Theorem with Imperfect Public Information
,
2022
.
[6]
Michihiro Kandori.
Check Your Partners' Behavior by Randomization: New Efficiency Results on Repeated Games with Imperfect Monitoring
,
1999
.
[7]
R. Radner,et al.
An Example of a Repeated Partnership Game with Discounting and with Uniformly Inefficient Equilibria
,
1986
.
[8]
Michele Piccione,et al.
The Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma with Imperfect Private Monitoring
,
2002,
J. Econ. Theory.
[9]
E. Stacchetti,et al.
Towards a Theory of Discounted Repeated Games with Imperfect Monitoring
,
1990
.
[10]
R. Radner.
Repeated Partnership Games with Imperfect Monitoring and No Discounting
,
1986
.
[11]
Robert J . Aumann,et al.
28. Mixed and Behavior Strategies in Infinite Extensive Games
,
1964
.