Transfer of Mathematical Knowledge: The Portability of Generic Instantiations

— Mathematical concepts are often difficult to acquire. This difficulty is evidenced by failure of knowledge to transfer to novel analogous situations. One approach to this challenge is to present the learner with a concrete instantiation of the to-be-learned concept. Concrete instantiations communicate more information than their abstract, generic counterparts and, in doing so, they may facilitate initial learning. However, this article argues that extraneous information in concrete instantiations may distract the learner from the relevant mathematical structure and, as a result, hinder transfer. At the same time, generic instantiations, such as traditional mathematical notation, can be learned by both children and adults and can, in turn, allow for transfer, suggesting that generic instantiations result in a portable knowledge representation.

[1]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy , 1983, Cogn. Sci..

[2]  Julie Sarama,et al.  Building Blocks for early childhood mathematics , 2003 .

[3]  U. Goswami.  Analogical Reasoning: What Develops? A Review of Research and Theory. , 1991 .

[4]  James Hiebert,et al.  A Cognitive Approach to Meaningful Mathematics Instruction: Testing a Local Theory Using Decimal Numbers. , 1988 .

[5]  K. Holyoak,et al.  The analogical mind. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[6]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  Modeling strategy shifts in a problem-solving task , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  Jennifer A. Kaminski,et al.  The advantage of simple symbols for learning and transfer , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  David H. Uttal,et al.  Taking a hard look at concreteness: Do concrete objects help young children to learn symbolic relations? , 2000 .

[9]  Vladimir M. Sloutsky,et al.  Relevant Concreteness and Its Effects on Learning and Transfer , 2005 .

[10]  Paul Thagard,et al.  Analogical Mapping by Constraint Satisfaction , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[11]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Reasoning about the referent of a picture versus reasoning about the picture as the referent: An effect of visual realism , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[12]  D. Gentner,et al.  Structural Alignment during Similarity Comparisons , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  D. Gentner,et al.  Similarity and the development of rules , 1998, Cognition.

[14]  J. Deloache.  Dual representation and young children's use of scale models. , 2000, Child development.

[15]  J. Deloache,et al.  Dual Representation and the Linking of Concrete and Symbolic Representations , 2009 .

[16]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Analogical problem solving , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  Evelyn J. Sowell.  Effects of Manipulative Materials in Mathematics Instruction , 1989 .

[18]  J. Sarama,et al.  “Concrete” Computer Manipulatives in Mathematics Education , 2009 .

[19]  L. R. Novick.  Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  The role of analogy in transfer between similar problem states , 1974 .

[21]  J. Deloache,et al.  Manipulatives as symbols: A new perspective on the use of concrete objects to teach mathematics , 1997 .

[22]  Alice J. Corkill,et al.  Interference and Inhibition in Cognition and Behavior: Unifying Themes for Educational Psychology , 1999 .

[23]  M. Bassok,et al.  Judging a book by its cover: Interpretative effects of content on problem-solving transfer , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[24]  Nicole M. McNeil,et al.  Rethinking the use of concrete materials in learning: Perspectives from development and education , 2009 .

[25]  Vladimir M Sloutsky,et al.  Is a picture worth a thousand words? The flexible nature of modality dominance in young children. , 2004, Child development.

[26]  V. Sloutsky,et al.  What's behind different kinds of kinds: effects of statistical density on learning and representation of categories. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  Usefulness of analogous solutions for solving algebra word problems , 1985 .

[28]  B. Ross.  This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects. , 1987 .

[29]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Schema induction and analogical transfer , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  Taylor Martin.  A Theory of Physically Distributed Learning: How External Environments and Internal States Interact in Mathematics Learning , 2009 .

[31]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Mechanisms of Analogical Learning. , 1987 .

[32]  B. Ross.  Distinguishing Types of Superficial Similarities: Different Effects on the Access and Use of Earlier Problems , 1989 .

[33]  Miriam Bassok,et al.  OBJECT-BASED REPRESENTATIONS : TRANSFER BETWEEN CASES OF CONTINUOUS AND DISCRETE MODELS OF CHANGE , 1995 .

[34]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[35]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  The transfer of abstract principles governing complex adaptive systems , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.