Rehabilitation strategy for post-stroke recovery using an innovative elbow exoskeleton

Intensive and adaptive rehabilitation therapy is beneficial for post-stroke recovery. Three modes of rehabilitation are generally performed at different stages after stroke: external force-based control in the acute stage, assistive force-based rehabilitation in the midway of recovery and resistive force-based rehabilitation in the last stage. To achieve the above requirements, an innovative elbow exoskeleton has been developed to incorporate the three modes of rehabilitation in a single structure. The structure of the exoskeleton has been designed in such a way that the whole working region is divided into three where each region can provide a different mode of rehabilitation. Recovery rate can be varied for individuals since it depends on various parameters. To evaluate the rate of recovery, three joint parameters have been identified: range of angular movement, angular velocity and joint torque. These parameters are incorporated into the framework of planning a novel rehabilitation strategy, which is discussed in this article along with the structural description of the designed exoskeleton.

[1]  Jun Morimoto,et al.  Adaptive Control of Exoskeleton Robots for Periodic Assistive Behaviours Based on EMG Feedback Minimisation , 2016, PloS one.

[2]  Müjdat Çetin,et al.  Detection of intention level in response to task difficulty from EEG signals , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP).

[3]  Ping Zhou,et al.  Re-evaluation of EMG-torque relation in chronic stroke using linear electrode array EMG recordings , 2016, Scientific reports.

[4]  Agnes Roby-Brami,et al.  Upper-Limb Robotic Exoskeletons for Neurorehabilitation: A Review on Control Strategies , 2016, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  S. Micera,et al.  EMG-based pattern recognition approach in post stroke robot-aided rehabilitation: a feasibility study , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[6]  Hermano I Krebs,et al.  Rehabilitation robotics: pilot trial of a spatial extension for MIT-Manus , 2004, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[7]  Just L Herder,et al.  Principle and design of a mobile arm support for people with muscular weakness. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[8]  Pedro Cruz,et al.  Design of an exoskeleton for upper limb robot-assisted rehabilitation based on co-simulation , 2016 .

[9]  George Howard,et al.  Global stroke statistics , 2017, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[10]  Francesco Giovacchini,et al.  HANDEXOS: Towards an exoskeleton device for the rehabilitation of the hand , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[11]  V. Dietz,et al.  Stretch-induced electromyographic activity and torque in spastic elbow muscles. Differential modulation of reflex activity in passive and active motor tasks. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[13]  Sheng Quan Xie,et al.  Exoskeleton robots for upper-limb rehabilitation: state of the art and future prospects. , 2012, Medical engineering & physics.

[14]  Venketesh N. Dubey,et al.  A novel hardware approach to integrating active and passive rehabilitation in a single exoskeleton , 2018, 2018 International Symposium on Medical Robotics (ISMR).

[15]  Winai Chonnaparamutt,et al.  SEFRE: Semiexoskeleton Rehabilitation System , 2016, Applied bionics and biomechanics.