The inhibition of imitative and overlearned responses: a functional double dissociation

[1]  Kim Kirsner,et al.  What Can we Infer from Double Dissociations? , 2003, Cortex.

[2]  J. Decety,et al.  What you believe versus what you think they believe: a neuroimaging study of conceptual perspective‐taking , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[3]  Jan Derrfuss,et al.  Imitative response tendencies in patients with frontal brain lesions. , 2003, Neuropsychology.

[4]  C. Frith,et al.  Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’ , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  T. Robbins,et al.  Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  Evelyn C. Ferstl,et al.  What Does the Frontomedian Cortex Contribute to Language Processing: Coherence or Theory of Mind? , 2002, NeuroImage.

[7]  M. Brass,et al.  The role of the frontal cortex in task preparation. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  N. Cohen,et al.  Attentional Control in the Aging Brain: Insights from an fMRI Study of the Stroop Task , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[9]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetry in human lateral prefrontal cortex during cognitive set shifting , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  W. Prinz.  Experimental approaches to imitation , 2002 .

[11]  Evelyn C. Ferstl,et al.  The Anterior Frontomedian Cortex and Evaluative Judgment: An fMRI Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[12]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  A PET Exploration of the Neural Mechanisms Involved in Reciprocal Imitation , 2002, NeuroImage.

[13]  D. Stuss,et al.  Stroop performance in focal lesion patients: dissociation of processes and frontal lobe lesion location , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  D. V. Cramon,et al.  Subprocesses of Performance Monitoring: A Dissociation of Error Processing and Response Competition Revealed by Event-Related fMRI and ERPs , 2001, NeuroImage.

[15]  Marcel Brass,et al.  The Inhibition of Imitative Response Tendencies , 2001, NeuroImage.

[16]  J C Mazziotta,et al.  Reafferent copies of imitated actions in the right superior temporal cortex , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  G Lohmann,et al.  LIPSIA--a new software system for the evaluation of functional magnetic resonance images of the human brain. , 2001, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[18]  M. Petrides,et al.  Wisconsin Card Sorting Revisited: Distinct Neural Circuits Participating in Different Stages of the Task Identified by Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[20]  K. Zilles,et al.  Mind Reading: Neural Mechanisms of Theory of Mind and Self-Perspective , 2001, NeuroImage.

[21]  J. Decety,et al.  Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: a PET investigation of agency , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Mapping Motor Inhibition: Conjunctive Brain Activations across Different Versions of Go/No-Go and Stop Tasks , 2001, NeuroImage.

[23]  R. Buckner,et al.  Transient Activation during Block Transition , 2001, NeuroImage.

[24]  G. Lohmann,et al.  Color-Word Matching Stroop Task: Separating Interference and Response Conflict , 2001, NeuroImage.

[25]  J. Decety,et al.  Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A meta‐analysis , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[26]  W. Prinz,et al.  Compatibility between Observed and Executed Finger Movements: Comparing Symbolic, Spatial, and Imitative Cues , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[27]  N. Cohen,et al.  Prefrontal regions play a predominant role in imposing an attentional 'set': evidence from fMRI. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[28]  J. Cohen,et al.  Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. , 2000, Science.

[29]  C. Frith,et al.  Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  V Bosch,et al.  Statistical analysis of multi‐subject fMRI data: Assessment of focal activations , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[31]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. , 1999, Science.

[32]  C. Frith,et al.  Interacting minds--a biological basis. , 1999, Science.

[33]  E. Stein,et al.  Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  J. Decety,et al.  Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Common inhibitory mechanism in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by event-related functional MRI. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[36]  M. Jeannerod.  The 25th Bartlett Lecture , 1999 .

[37]  S. Aglioti,et al.  The body in the brain: neural bases of corporeal awareness , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.

[38]  E. Renzi,et al.  Imitation and utilisation behaviour. , 1996, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[39]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  The role of prefrontal regions in the Stroop task , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[40]  C. Olson,et al.  Functional heterogeneity in cingulate cortex: the anterior executive and posterior evaluative regions. , 1992, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  Colin M. Macleod.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[42]  M. Torrens.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[43]  B. Pillon,et al.  Human autonomy and the frontal lobes. Part I: Imitation and utilization behavior: A neuropsychological study of 75 patients , 1986, Annals of neurology.

[44]  E. Perret.  The left frontal lobe of man and the suppression of habitual responses in verbal categorical behaviour. , 1974, Neuropsychologia.

[45]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[46]  A. Dove,et al.  Prefrontal cortex activation in task switching: an event-related fMRI study. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[47]  M. Jeannerod.  TO ACT OR NOT TO ACT : PERSPECTIVES ON THE REPRESENTATION OF ACTIONS , 1999 .

[48]  E. Maguire,et al.  Knowing Where Things Are: Parahippocampal Involvement in Encoding Object Locations in Virtual Large-Scale Space , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[49]  J. Stroop.  Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[50]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Attention to Action , 1986 .

[51]  A. Luria.  Higher Cortical Functions in Man , 1980, Springer US.

[52]  G. Schwartz,et al.  Consciousness and Self-Regulation , 1976 .