Obfuscation maximization-based decision-making: Theory, methodology and first empirical evidence

Abstract Theories of decision-making are routinely based on the notion that decision-makers choose alternatives which align with their underlying preferences—and hence that their preferences can be inferred from their choices. In some situations, however, a decision-maker may wish to hide his or her preferences from an onlooker. This paper argues that such obfuscation-based choice behavior is likely to be relevant in various situations, such as political decision-making. This paper puts forward a simple and tractable discrete choice model of obfuscation-based choice behavior, by combining the well-known concepts of Bayesian inference and information entropy. After deriving the model and illustrating some key properties, the paper presents the results of an obfuscation game that was designed to explore whether decision-makers, when properly incentivized, would be able to obfuscate effectively, and which heuristics they employ to do so. Together, the analyses presented in this paper provide stepping stones towards a more profound understanding of obfuscation-based decision-making.

[1]  Joffre Swait,et al.  The Akaike Likelihood Ratio Index , 1986, Transp. Sci..

[2]  George Loewenstein,et al.  Experimental Economics From the Vantage‐point of Behavioural Economics , 1999 .

[3]  E. Rasmusen Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification , 1998 .

[4]  J. Swait,et al.  Probabilistic Choice (Models) as a Result of Balancing Multiple Goals , 2013 .

[5]  Benjamin I. Page The Theory of Political Ambiguity , 1976, American Political Science Review.

[6]  Mark Alfano,et al.  Moral Psychology: An Introduction , 2016 .

[7]  Donelson R. Forsyth,et al.  Personal moral philosophies and moral choice , 1990 .

[8]  P. Samuelson Consumption Theory in Terms of Revealed Preference , 1948 .

[9]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. , 1977 .

[10]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Moral Satisficing: Rethinking Moral Behavior as Bounded Rationality , 2010, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[11]  W. Edwards The theory of decision making. , 1954, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  D. E. Bell,et al.  Decision making: Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions. , 1990 .

[13]  K. Train Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2003 .

[14]  张谷 实验经济学(Experimental Economics)研究思路及成果应用简述 , 1994 .

[15]  J. Kagel,et al.  Handbook of Experimental Economics , 1997 .

[16]  D. Prelec A Bayesian Truth Serum for Subjective Data , 2004, Science.

[17]  D. Y. Kono Optimal Obfuscation: Democracy and Trade Policy Transparency , 2006, American Political Science Review.

[18]  Cass R. Sunstein moral heuristics , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[19]  Robert H. Frank,et al.  The Political Economy of Preference Falsification: Timur Kuran's Private Truths, Public Lies , 1996 .

[20]  David G. Rand,et al.  Do the Right Thing: Experimental Evidence that Preferences for Moral Behavior, Rather Than Equity or Efficiency per se, Drive Human Prosociality , 2018, Judgment and Decision Making.

[21]  John M. Frost,et al.  Moral heuristics. Commentaries. Author's reply , 2005 .

[22]  A. Gelman,et al.  The garden of forking paths : Why multiple comparisons can be a problem , even when there is no “ fishing expedition ” or “ p-hacking ” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time ∗ , 2019 .

[23]  Richard McElreath,et al.  The Evolution of Covert Signaling , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[24]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis , 1979 .

[25]  Anna van 't Veer,et al.  Limited capacity to lie: Cognitive load interferes with being dishonest , 2014, Judgment and Decision Making.

[26]  Paula Jarzabkowski,et al.  Strategic ambiguity as a rhetorical resource for enabling multiple interests , 2010 .

[27]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  The Belief-Desire-Intention Model of Agency , 1998, ATAL.

[28]  Oded Netzer,et al.  Alternative Models for Capturing the Compromise Effect , 2004 .

[29]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[30]  D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[31]  L. Hurwicz The Design of Mechanisms for Resource Allocation , 1973 .

[32]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs , 1976 .

[33]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  Oliver Schilke,et al.  It’s Only Wrong If It’s Transactional: Moral Perceptions of Obfuscated Exchange , 2018, American Sociological Review.

[35]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  Incentive and informational properties of preference questions , 2007 .

[36]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[37]  David Palma,et al.  Apollo: A flexible, powerful and customisable freeware package for choice model estimation and application , 2019, Journal of Choice Modelling.

[38]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[39]  Paula Jarzabkowski,et al.  Internationalization in a business school: Co-existing and entwined professional and organizational narratives , 2007 .

[40]  K. Small,et al.  Applied Welfare Economics with Discrete Choice Models , 1979 .

[41]  J. Swait,et al.  Goal-based models for discrete choice analysis , 2017 .

[42]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  An empirical comparison of travel choice models that capture preferences for compromise alternatives , 2013 .

[43]  Cristiano Castelfranchi,et al.  Artificial liars: Why computers will (necessarily) deceive us and each other , 2000, Ethics and Information Technology.

[44]  B. Kahn Consumer variety-seeking among goods and services: An integrative review , 1995 .

[45]  J. Haidt The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. , 2001, Psychological review.

[46]  Hart,et al.  The Aims of the Criminal Law , 1958 .

[47]  Tomasz Zurek,et al.  Goals, values, and reasoning , 2017, Expert Syst. Appl..

[48]  B. Douglas Bernheim,et al.  Veblen Effects in a Theory of Conspicuous Consumption , 1996 .

[49]  Peter J. Alexander Product variety and market structure: A new measure and a simple test , 1997 .

[50]  Richard Batley,et al.  Applied welfare economics with discrete choice models: a review of model properties and specification , 2011 .

[51]  Timur Kuran Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification , 1995 .

[52]  I. Simonson,et al.  Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects , 1989 .

[53]  A. Rivlin,et al.  Economic Choices , 2001 .

[54]  A. Sen,et al.  Choice Functions and Revealed Preference , 1971 .

[55]  Kenneth E. McConnell,et al.  Consumer Surplus from Discrete Choice Models , 1995 .

[56]  Heinrich von Stackelberg Market Structure and Equilibrium , 2010 .

[57]  Arianna Novaro,et al.  Does Telling White Lies Signal Pro-Social Preferences? , 2015, Judgment and Decision Making.

[58]  R. Hogarth,et al.  BEHAVIORAL DECISION THEORY: PROCESSES OF JUDGMENT AND CHOICE , 1981 .

[59]  Eva Niesten,et al.  Credibly reducing information asymmetry: Signaling on economic or environmental value by environmental alliances , 2020, Long Range Planning.

[60]  A. K. Basu A Theory of Decision-Making , 1973, The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare.

[61]  R. Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. , 1960 .

[62]  Pier Paolo Saviotti,et al.  Information, variety and entropy in technoeconomic development☆ , 1988 .

[63]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[64]  T. Arentze,et al.  A need-based model of multi-day, multi-person activity generation , 2009 .

[65]  H. Houthakker Revealed Preference and the Utility Function , 1950 .

[66]  Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification. , 1996 .

[67]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[68]  Kimmo Eriksson,et al.  Deception and price in a market with asymmetric information , 2007, Judgment and Decision Making.

[69]  Colin Camerer,et al.  A Cognitive Hierarchy Model of Games , 2004 .

[70]  John Danaher,et al.  Robot Betrayal: a guide to the ethics of robotic deception , 2020, Ethics and Information Technology.

[71]  Zvika Neeman,et al.  Strategic Ambiguity in Electoral Competition , 2000 .

[72]  V. Smith Papers in experimental economics , 1991 .

[73]  Alvin E. Roth,et al.  The Handbook of Experimental Economics, Volume 2 , 2016 .

[74]  Heiko Beyer,et al.  Three experimental approaches to measure the social context dependence of prejudice communication and discriminatory behavior. , 2015, Social science research.

[75]  A. Tversky Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. , 1972 .

[76]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Generalized random utility model , 2002, Math. Soc. Sci..