Visual adaptation and 7T fMRI reveal facial identity processing in the human brain under shallow interocular suppression

Face identity is represented at a high level of the visual hierarchy. Whether the human brain can process facial identity information in the absence of visual awareness remains unclear. In this study, we investigated potential face identity representation through face-identity adaptation with the adapting faces interocularly suppressed by Continuous Flash Suppression (CFS) noise, a modified binocular rivalry paradigm. The strength of interocular suppression was manipulated by varying the contrast of CFS noise. While obeservers reported the face images subjectively unperceived and the face identity objectively unrecognizable, a significant face identity aftereffect was observed under low but not high contrast CFS noise. In addition, the identity of face images under shallow interocular suppression can be decoded from multi-voxel patterns in the right fusiform face area (FFA) obtained with high-resolution 7T fMRI. Thus the comined evidence from visual adaptation and 7T fMRI suggest that face identity can be represented in the human brain without explicit perceptual recognition. The processing of interocularly suppressed faces could occur at different levels depending on how "deep" the information is suppressed.

[1]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  ROBERT FOX,et al.  Adaptation to invisible gratings and the site of binocular rivalry suppression , 1974, Nature.

[3]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[4]  G. Rees,et al.  Conscious awareness is required for holistic face processing , 2014, Consciousness and Cognition.

[5]  P. Sterzer,et al.  Breaking Continuous Flash Suppression: A New Measure of Unconscious Processing during Interocular Suppression? , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[6]  Stefan R. Schweinberger,et al.  Covert Recognition and the Neural System for Face Processing , 2003, Cortex.

[7]  T. Carlson,et al.  Patterns of Activity in the Categorical Representations of Objects , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  Johannes Jacobus Fahrenfort,et al.  The human visual system differentially represents subjectively and objectively invisible stimuli , 2021, PLoS biology.

[9]  L. Deouell,et al.  Conscious awareness is necessary for processing race and gender information from faces , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.

[10]  Yaroslav O. Halchenko,et al.  Processing of invisible social cues , 2013, Consciousness and Cognition.

[11]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[12]  Daniel D. Dilks,et al.  Differential selectivity for dynamic versus static information in face-selective cortical regions , 2011, NeuroImage.

[13]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Electromagnetic responses to invisible face stimuli during binocular suppression , 2009, NeuroImage.

[14]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Do Pictures of Faces, and Which Ones, Capture Attention in the Inattentional-Blindness Paradigm? , 2009, Perception.

[15]  F. Fang,et al.  Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  Reza Rajimehr,et al.  Unconscious Orientation Processing , 2004, Neuron.

[17]  P. Sterzer,et al.  Making eye contact without awareness , 2014, Cognition.

[18]  Richard N. Henson,et al.  Activity in Face-Responsive Brain Regions is Modulated by Invisible, Attended Faces: Evidence from Masked Priming , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  C. Koch,et al.  Neural correlates of consciousness: progress and problems , 2016, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[20]  Wataru Sato,et al.  Attentional shift by gaze is triggered without awareness , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[22]  Hans Spinnler,et al.  Covert Person Recognition: its Fadeout in a Case of Temporal Lobe Degeneration , 2003, Cortex.

[23]  Marlene Behrmann,et al.  Unraveling the distributed neural code of facial identity through spatiotemporal pattern analysis , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  G. Yovel,et al.  Successful Decoding of Famous Faces in the Fusiform Face Area , 2015, PloS one.

[25]  J. Changeux,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.10 No.5 May 2006 Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy , 2022 .

[26]  Zachary A. Ingbretsen,et al.  Amygdala Responsivity to High-Level Social Information from Unseen Faces , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  J. Haxby,et al.  Neural systems for recognition of familiar faces , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  L. Riggs,et al.  Binocular interactions during establishment of McCollough effects , 1978, Vision Research.

[29]  C. Koch,et al.  Neural correlates of consciousness: progress and problems , 2016, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[30]  G. Rhodes,et al.  The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  Aaron Schurger A very inexpensive MRI-compatible method for dichoptic visual stimulation , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[32]  M. Bar,et al.  Cortical Mechanisms Specific to Explicit Visual Object Recognition , 2001, Neuron.

[33]  B Crassini,et al.  The Sensitivity of Binocular Rivalry Suppression to Changes in Orientation Assessed by Reaction-Time and Forced-Choice Techniques , 1981, Perception.

[34]  Marius V Peelen,et al.  Eye gaze adaptation under interocular suppression. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[35]  Shlomo Bentin,et al.  Attentional and perceptual factors affecting the attentional blink for faces and objects. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  M. Overgaard,et al.  Is conscious perception gradual or dichotomous? A comparison of report methodologies during a visual task , 2006, Consciousness and Cognition.

[37]  G. Rhodes,et al.  The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces. , 2005, Proceedings. Biological sciences.

[38]  N. Lavie,et al.  Changing Faces: A Detection Advantage in the Flicker Paradigm , 2001, Psychological science.

[39]  David R. Shanks,et al.  Regressive research: The pitfalls of post hoc data selection in the study of unconscious mental processes , 2016, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[40]  J. Barton Structure and function in acquired prosopagnosia: lessons from a series of 10 patients with brain damage. , 2008, Journal of neuropsychology.

[41]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  How Rich Is Consciousness? the Partial Awareness Hypothesis Opinion , 2022 .

[42]  Rafael Malach,et al.  Detailed Exploration of Face-related Processing in Congenital Prosopagnosia: 2. Functional Neuroimaging Findings , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  M. Carandini,et al.  Normalization as a canonical neural computation , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[44]  R. Fox,et al.  Effect of binocular rivalry suppression on the motion aftereffect , 1975, Vision Research.

[45]  C. Koch,et al.  Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[46]  Iris A Zerweck,et al.  The unconscious priming fallacy: When can scientists truly claim an indirect task advantage? , 2020 .

[47]  Andrew G Webb,et al.  Quantitative assessment of the effects of high‐permittivity pads in 7 Tesla MRI of the brain , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[48]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  The dynamics of object-selective activation correlate with recognition performance in humans , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[49]  H. Esteky,et al.  Orientation-Selective Adaptation during Motion-Induced Blindness , 2004, Perception.

[50]  G. Rees,et al.  Fine-scale activity patterns in high-level visual areas encode the category of invisible objects. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[51]  D. Heeger,et al.  Continuous Flash Suppression Modulates Cortical Activity in Early Visual Cortex , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  Christof Koch,et al.  Face Adaptation Depends on Seeing the Face , 2005, Neuron.

[53]  P. Sterzer,et al.  High-level face shape adaptation depends on visual awareness: evidence from continuous flash suppression. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[54]  Richard N. A. Henson,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of masked face priming , 2008, NeuroImage.

[55]  John Duncan,et al.  Absence of Face-specific Cortical Activity in the Complete Absence of Awareness: Converging Evidence from Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Event-related Potentials , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[56]  B. Bahrami,et al.  Unconscious Evaluation of Faces on Social Dimensions , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[57]  Brian N. Pasley,et al.  Subcortical Discrimination of Unperceived Objects during Binocular Rivalry , 2004, Neuron.

[58]  M. Bar,et al.  Exploring the unconscious using faces , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[59]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Combining multivariate voxel selection and support vector machines for mapping and classification of fMRI spatial patterns , 2008, NeuroImage.

[60]  Sheng He,et al.  Cortical Responses to Invisible Faces: Dissociating Subsystems for Facial-Information Processing , 2006, Current Biology.

[61]  Katie L. H. Gray,et al.  High-Level Face Adaptation Without Awareness , 2010, Psychological science.

[62]  D. Heeger,et al.  Inter-ocular contrast normalization in human visual cortex. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[63]  M A Bobes,et al.  Different scalp topography of brain potentials related to expression and identity matching of faces. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[64]  S Zeki,et al.  The relationship between cortical activation and perception investigated with invisible stimuli , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[65]  Christof Koch,et al.  A direct comparison of unconscious face processing under masking and interocular suppression , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[66]  P. Sterzer,et al.  Investigating category‐ and shape‐selective neural processing in ventral and dorsal visual stream under interocular suppression , 2015, Human brain mapping.

[67]  Volker H Franz,et al.  Advancing research on unconscious priming: When can scientists claim an indirect task advantage? , 2021, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[68]  Sheng He,et al.  Dynamics of processing invisible faces in the brain: Automatic neural encoding of facial expression information , 2009, NeuroImage.

[69]  Norbert Kathmann,et al.  Differential modulation of visual object processing in dorsal and ventral stream by stimulus visibility , 2016, Cortex.

[70]  Kenneth F. Valyear,et al.  The fusiform face area is not sufficient for face recognition: Evidence from a patient with dense prosopagnosia and no occipital face area , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[71]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP , 2017, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.