Three methods for identifying novel affordances

Abstract We describe three approaches to identify novel product affordances: affordance of absence; insights from lead users, specifically do-it-yourselfers (DIYers); and natural-language searches. While these approaches were separately pursued, we show their connection to each other in this paper. We begin by describing the affordance of absence, inspired by insights on affordances arising from a lack of resources. For example, in the absence of specialized tools, more general tools are used to accomplish similar tasks. Such absence clarifies how other tools could be modified to add relevant features and identifies critical features of the absent tool. In addition, the temporary removal of physical features and objects enables user interaction in ways that may not emerge in their presence. Affordance of absence has the potential to more fully specify affordances for a given object and to help overcome functional fixedness. For the second approach, we describe insights from DIYers obtained from the “IKEA hackers” online community. We consider DIYers lead users for seeking out and exploiting product affordances, often transforming product functions dramatically. We also discuss their projects through the lens of affordance of absence. For the third approach, we outline our natural-language approach to affordance extraction, beginning with consumer product reviews provided for Canadian Tire, a major Canadian retailer. We describe efforts toward automatically identifying less common affordances, and the use of cue phrases to highlight insightful DIY transformations from the IKEA hackers community. Finally, we comment on the potential value of this work for product design in general.

[1]  B. Latour 10 ''Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts'' , 1992 .

[2]  Georges M. Fadel,et al.  Affordance-based design methods for innovative design, redesign and reverse engineering , 2009 .

[3]  Amanda Chou,et al.  Towards Extracting Affordances From Online Consumer Product Reviews , 2014 .

[4]  E. Gibson,et al.  Development of knowledge of visual-tactual affordances of substance. , 1984, Child development.

[5]  Krista Casler,et al.  Young children's rapid learning about artifacts. , 2005, Developmental science.

[6]  L. G. Pawlson The Oregon Experiment , 1991, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[7]  Georges M. Fadel,et al.  Affordance-Based Methods for Design , 2003 .

[8]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[9]  Andy Dong,et al.  The Use and Misuse of the Concept of Affordance , 2015 .

[10]  Warren P. Seering,et al.  Function Sharing in Mechanical Design , 1988, AAAI.

[11]  Madeleine Akrich,et al.  The De-scription of Technical Objects , 1992 .

[12]  Carl Myhill,et al.  Commercial Success by Looking for Desire Lines , 2004, APCHI.

[13]  V. Glăveanu,et al.  What Can Be Done with an Egg? Creativity, Material Objects, and the Theory of Affordances. , 2012 .

[14]  Alexander Stoytchev,et al.  Behavior-Grounded Representation of Tool Affordances , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  Veronica J. Dark,et al.  Cognitively describing and designing affordances , 2013 .

[16]  Georges M. Fadel,et al.  IDENTIFYING AFFORDANCES , 2007 .

[17]  Simone Teufel,et al.  Sentence extraction as a classification task , 1997 .

[18]  Jayesh Srivastava,et al.  Encouraging Resource-Conscious Behavior Through Product Design: The Principle of Discretization , 2013 .

[19]  E J Gibson,et al.  Detection of the traversability of surfaces by crawling and walking infants. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Jayesh Srivastava,et al.  The Affordance of Absence , 2014 .

[21]  William W. Gaver Technology affordances , 1991, CHI.

[22]  Yong Se Kim,et al.  User activity analysis for design for affordance , 2013 .

[23]  Jayesh Srivastava,et al.  Affordances and Product Design to Support Environmentally Conscious Behavior , 2013 .

[24]  Jiahui Lu,et al.  Perceiving and Interacting Affordances: A New Model of Human–Affordance Interactions , 2013, Integrative psychological & behavioral science.

[25]  James M. Rehg,et al.  Decoupling behavior, perception, and control for autonomous learning of affordances , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[26]  Georges M. Fadel,et al.  AFFORDANCE-BASED DESIGN: STATUS AND PROMISE , 2006 .

[27]  Keiichi Sato,et al.  Affordances in Product Architecture: Linking Technical Functions and Users’ Tasks , 2005 .

[28]  M. Scheerer,et al.  Problem Solving , 1967, Nature.

[29]  J. Andrew Bagnell,et al.  Perceiving, learning, and exploiting object affordances for autonomous pile manipulation , 2013, Auton. Robots.

[30]  Georges M. Fadel,et al.  Affordance based design: a relational theory for design , 2009 .

[31]  Y. S. Kim,et al.  Affordance Feature Reasoning in Some Home Appliances Products , 2009 .

[32]  L. H. Shu,et al.  Do-it-yourselfers as Lead users for Environmentally Conscious Behavior☆ , 2014 .

[33]  Shih-Wen Hsiao,et al.  An online affordance evaluation model for product design , 2012 .

[34]  Lucia Riggio,et al.  Sentence comprehension and simulation of object temporary, canonical and stable affordances , 2009, Brain Research.