N400 amplitudes reflect change in a probabilistic representation of meaning: Evidence from a connectionist model
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Jeffrey Pennington,et al. GloVe: Global Vectors for Word Representation , 2014, EMNLP.
[2] D. Plaut,et al. A neurally plausible Parallel Distributed Processing model of Event-Related Potential word reading data , 2012, Brain and Language.
[3] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. A Rose by Any Other Name: Long-Term Memory Structure and Sentence Processing , 1999 .
[4] Harm Brouwer,et al. The electrophysiology of language comprehension A neurocomputational model , 2010 .
[5] Jeffrey L. Elman,et al. Finding Structure in Time , 1990, Cogn. Sci..
[6] James L. McClelland,et al. Précis of Semantic Cognition: A Parallel Distributed Processing Approach , 2008, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[7] James L. McClelland,et al. Sentence comprehension: A parallel distributed processing approach , 1989, Language and Cognitive Processes.
[8] Yves Chauvin,et al. Backpropagation: the basic theory , 1995 .
[9] R. Levy. Expectation-based syntactic comprehension , 2008, Cognition.
[10] Pierre Baldi,et al. Bayesian surprise attracts human attention , 2005, Vision Research.
[11] M. Rugg,et al. Modulation of event-related potentials by word repetition: the effects of inter-item lag. , 1989, Psychophysiology.
[12] Marshall R. Mayberry,et al. Situated sentence processing: The coordinated interplay account and a neurobehavioral model , 2010, Brain and Language.
[13] Karl G. D. Bailey,et al. Good-Enough Representations in Language Comprehension , 2002 .
[14] C. C. Wood,et al. Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[15] M. Kutas,et al. An Electrophysiological Probe of Incidental Semantic Association , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[16] D. Caplan,et al. Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[17] M. Kutas,et al. Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.
[18] Geoffrey E. Hinton. Connectionist Learning Procedures , 1989, Artif. Intell..
[19] M. Kutas,et al. Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.
[20] S. Frank,et al. The ERP response to the amount of information conveyed by words in sentences , 2015, Brain and Language.
[21] Karl J. Friston,et al. A theory of cortical responses , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[22] M. Kutas,et al. Interactions between sentence context and word frequencyinevent-related brainpotentials , 1990, Memory & cognition.
[23] M. Kutas,et al. An Event-Related Potential (ERP) Analysis of Semantic Congruity and Repetition Effects in Sentences , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[24] Dorothee J. Chwilla,et al. When Heuristics Clash with Parsing Routines: ERP Evidence for Conflict Monitoring in Sentence Perception , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[25] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.