Mathematical Modeling

Explanations of human behavior are most often presented in a verbal form as theories. Psychologists can also harness the power and precision of mathematics by explaining behavior quantitatively. This chapter introduces the reader to how this is done and the advantages of doing so. It begins by contrasting mathematical modeling with hypothesis testing to highlight how the two methods of knowledge acquisition differ. The many styles of modeling are then surveyed, along with their advantages and disadvantages. This is followed by an in-depth example of how to create a mathematical model and fit it to experimental data. Issues in evaluating models are discussed, including a survey of quantitative methods of model selection. Particular attention is paid to the concept of generalizability and the trade-off of model fit with model complexity. The chapter closes by describing some of the challenges for the discipline in the years ahead.

[1]  L L THURSTONE,et al.  The measurement of values. , 1960, Psychological review.

[2]  Andrew B. Whitford.  Bayesian Methods: A Social and Behavioral Sciences Approach , 2003, Journal of Politics.

[3]  I. J. Myung,et al.  Applying Occam’s razor in modeling cognition: A Bayesian approach , 1997 .

[4]  M. Lee.  How cognitive modeling can benefit from hierarchical Bayesian models. , 2011 .

[5]  Jorma Rissanen,et al.  Fisher information and stochastic complexity , 1996, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[6]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators , 1989, Neural Networks.

[7]  Andrew Thomas,et al.  WinBUGS - A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility , 2000, Stat. Comput..

[8]  P. Fishburn.  The Foundations Of Expected Utility , 2010 .

[9]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Universal approximation of an unknown mapping and its derivatives using multilayer feedforward networks , 1990, Neural Networks.

[10]  J. Wixted,et al.  On the Form of Forgetting , 1991 .

[11]  D. Rubin,et al.  One Hundred Years of Forgetting : A Quantitative Description of Retention , 1996 .

[12]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[13]  J. Townsend,et al.  Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. , 1993, Psychological review.

[14]  Bin Yu,et al.  Model Selection and the Principle of Minimum Description Length , 2001 .

[15]  W. K Estes,et al.  Some targets for mathematical psychology , 1975 .

[16]  I. J. Myung,et al.  The Importance of Complexity in Model Selection. , 2000, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[17]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  A hierarchical bayesian statistical framework for response time distributions , 2003 .

[18]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[19]  G. Schwarz.  Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[20]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  Bayesian hypothesis testing for psychologists: A tutorial on the Savage–Dickey method , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  I. J. Myung,et al.  Toward a method of selecting among computational models of cognition. , 2002, Psychological review.

[22]  S. Lewandowsky.  The Rewards and Hazards of Computer Simulations , 1993 .

[23]  R. Nosofsky.  Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[24]  David M. Riefer,et al.  Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  E. Wagenmakers.  A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  Browne,et al.  Cross-Validation Methods. , 2000, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[27]  William H. Press,et al.  The Art of Scientific Computing Second Edition , 1998 .

[28]  Julian N. Marewski,et al.  Beyond the null ritual : Formal modeling of psychological processes , 2009 .

[29]  Michael D. Lee,et al.  A Model of Knower-Level Behavior in Number Concept Development , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[30]  Mark Steyvers,et al.  Topics in semantic representation. , 2007, Psychological review.

[31]  Andrea Stocco,et al.  The cognitive modeling of human behavior: Why a model is (sometimes) better than 10,000 words , 2007, Cognitive Systems Research.

[32]  J. Aczél,et al.  Lectures on Functional Equations and Their Applications , 1968 .

[33]  Marc W. Howard,et al.  A distributed representation of temporal context , 2002 .

[34]  W. Estes,et al.  Traps in the route to models of memory and decision , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[35]  Sanjay Jain,et al.  Editors' Introduction , 2005, ALT.

[36]  Jun Lu,et al.  An introduction to Bayesian hierarchical models with an application in the theory of signal detection , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[37]  Christopher Hitchcock,et al.  Prediction Versus Accommodation and the Risk of Overfitting , 2004, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[38]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[39]  I. J. Myung,et al.  GUEST EDITORS' INTRODUCTION: Special Issue on Model Selection , 2000 .

[40]  P. Meehl.  Appraising and Amending Theories: The Strategy of Lakatosian Defense and Two Principles that Warrant It , 1990 .

[41]  Patrick Suppes,et al.  Introduction To Logic , 1958 .

[42]  Peter Grünwald,et al.  Accumulative prediction error and the selection of time series models , 2006 .

[43]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Models of visual word recognition: Sampling the state of the art. , 1994 .

[44]  W. W. Rozeboom.  The fallacy of the null-hypothesis significance test. , 1960, Psychological bulletin.

[45]  R. Luce.  Utility of Gains and Losses: Measurement-Theoretical and Experimental Approaches , 2000 .

[46]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[47]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[48]  Richard M. Shiffrin,et al.  The art of model development and testing , 1997 .

[49]  D. Lykken.  Statistical significance in psychological research. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.

[50]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[51]  G. Gigerenzer.  From Tools to Theories: A Heuristic of Discovery in Cognitive Psychology. , 1991 .

[52]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Is the go/no-go lexical decision task an alternative to the yes/no lexical decision task? , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[53]  I. J. Myung,et al.  Tutorial on maximum likelihood estimation , 2003 .

[54]  Michael D. Lee,et al.  A Survey of Model Evaluation Approaches With a Tutorial on Hierarchical Bayesian Methods , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[55]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[56]  M. Lee,et al.  A Bayesian analysis of human decision-making on bandit problems , 2009 .

[57]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Special issue on “Probabilistic models of cognition , 2022 .

[58]  Wasserman,et al.  Bayesian Model Selection and Model Averaging. , 2000, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[59]  J. Kruschke,et al.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. , 1992, Psychological review.

[60]  T. Griffiths,et al.  A rational analysis of the effects of memory biases on serial reproduction , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[61]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A model for recognition memory: REM—retrieving effectively from memory , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[62]  M. Lee.  Three case studies in the Bayesian analysis of cognitive models , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[63]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  A temporal ratio model of memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[64]  J. Raaijmakers,et al.  How to quantify support for and against the null hypothesis: A flexible WinBUGS implementation of a default Bayesian t test , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[65]  J. Kruschke.  What to believe: Bayesian methods for data analysis , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.