Decentralized Trajectory Tracking Control for Soft Robots Interacting With the Environment

Despite the classic nature of the problem, trajectory tracking for soft robots, i.e., robots with compliant elements deliberately introduced in their design, still presents several challenges. One of these is to design controllers which can obtain sufficiently high performance while preserving the physical characteristics intrinsic to soft robots. Indeed, classic control schemes using high-gain feedback actions fundamentally alter the natural compliance of soft robots effectively stiffening them, thus de facto defeating their main design purpose. As an alternative approach, we consider here using a low-gain feedback, while exploiting feedforward components. In order to cope with the complexity and uncertainty of the dynamics, we adopt a decentralized, iteratively learned feedforward action, combined with a locally optimal feedback control. The relative authority of the feedback and feedforward control actions adapts with the degree of uncertainty of the learned component. The effectiveness of the method is experimentally verified on several robotic structures and working conditions, including unexpected interactions with the environment, where preservation of softness is critical for safety and robustness.

[1]  G. Oriolo,et al.  Robotics: Modelling, Planning and Control , 2008 .

[2]  Matthew M. Williamson,et al.  Series elastic actuators , 1995, Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots.

[3]  D. Jacobson New conditions for boundedness of the solution of a matrix Riccati differential equation , 1970 .

[4]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  Variable impedance actuators: A review , 2013, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[5]  Matteo Bianchi,et al.  Controlling Soft Robots: Balancing Feedback and Feedforward Elements , 2017, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[6]  Genzhong Wu,et al.  Adaptive Iterative Learning Control for Robot Manipulators , 2012 .

[7]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Variable stiffness actuators: The user’s point of view , 2015, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[8]  Cecilia Laschi,et al.  Soft robotics: a bioinspired evolution in robotics. , 2013, Trends in biotechnology.

[9]  Giorgio Grioli,et al.  The Quest for Natural Machine Motion: An Open Platform to Fast-Prototyping Articulated Soft Robots , 2017, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[10]  Fengfeng Xi,et al.  Iterative Learning Control With Switching Gain Feedback for Nonlinear Systems , 2011 .

[11]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Backstepping Control of Variable Stiffness Robots , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[12]  P. R. Ouyang,et al.  Application of Online Iterative Learning Tracking Control for Quadrotor UAVs , 2013 .

[13]  R. E. Kalman,et al.  Contributions to the Theory of Optimal Control , 1960 .

[14]  George M. Siouris,et al.  Applied Optimal Control: Optimization, Estimation, and Control , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[15]  George G. Adams,et al.  Contact modeling — forces , 2000 .

[16]  Alessandro De Luca,et al.  Efficient Computation of Inverse Dynamics and Feedback Linearization for VSA-Based Robots , 2016, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[17]  Kaare Brandt Petersen,et al.  The Matrix Cookbook , 2006 .

[18]  A.G. Alleyne,et al.  A survey of iterative learning control , 2006, IEEE Control Systems.

[19]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  Springer Handbook of Robotics , 2007, Springer Handbooks.

[20]  Suguru Arimoto,et al.  Bettering operation of Robots by learning , 1984, J. Field Robotics.

[21]  Alessandro De Luca,et al.  Nonlinear decoupled motion-stiffness control and collision detection/reaction for the VSA-II variable stiffness device , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[22]  G. Whitesides Soft Robotics. , 2018, Angewandte Chemie.