Automotive Collision Risk Estimation Under Cooperative Sensing

This paper offers a technique for estimating collision risk for automated ground vehicles engaged in cooperative sensing. The technique allows quantification of (i) risk reduced due to cooperation, and (ii) the increased accuracy of risk assessment due to cooperation. If either is significant, cooperation can be viewed as a desirable practice for meeting the stringent risk budget of increasingly automated vehicles; if not, then cooperation—with its various drawbacks—need not be pursued. Collision risk is evaluated over an ego vehicle’s trajectory based on a dynamic probabilistic occupancy map and a loss function that maps collision-relevant state information to a cost metric. The risk evaluation framework is demonstrated using real data captured from two cooperating vehicles traversing an urban intersection.

[1]  Klaus C. J. Dietmayer,et al.  Object Detection on Dynamic Occupancy Grid Maps Using Deep Learning and Automatic Label Generation , 2018, 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[2]  Christian Laugier,et al.  Bayesian Occupancy Filtering for Multitarget Tracking: An Automotive Application , 2006, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[3]  Gustavo de Veciana,et al.  Performance and Scaling of Collaborative Sensing and Networking for Automated Driving Applications , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops).

[4]  T. Kanade,et al.  Monte Carlo road safety reasoning , 2005, IEEE Proceedings. Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2005..

[5]  Georg Tanzmeister,et al.  Grid-Based Object Tracking With Nonlinear Dynamic State and Shape Estimation , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[6]  Francesco Borrelli,et al.  Automated driving: The role of forecasts and uncertainty - A control perspective , 2015, Eur. J. Control.

[7]  Tobias Gindele,et al.  Bayesian Occupancy grid Filter for dynamic environments using prior map knowledge , 2009, 2009 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[8]  Antonio Martínez-Álvarez,et al.  A Review of the Bayesian Occupancy Filter , 2017, Sensors.

[9]  Lukas Rummelhard,et al.  Conditional Monte Carlo Dense Occupancy Tracker , 2015, 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[10]  Richard J. Cleary Handbook of Beta Distribution and Its Applications , 2006 .

[11]  Dizan Vasquez,et al.  A survey on motion prediction and risk assessment for intelligent vehicles , 2014, ROBOMECH Journal.

[12]  Amnon Shashua,et al.  On a Formal Model of Safe and Scalable Self-driving Cars , 2017, ArXiv.

[13]  Ba-Ngu Vo,et al.  Labeled Random Finite Sets and Multi-Object Conjugate Priors , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[14]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Probabilistic robotics , 2002, CACM.

[15]  Amaury Nègre,et al.  A Visibility-Based Approach for Occupancy Grid Computation in Disparity Space , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[16]  Sergiu Nedevschi,et al.  Modeling and Tracking the Driving Environment With a Particle-Based Occupancy Grid , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[17]  Klaus C. J. Dietmayer,et al.  Entering crossroads with blind corners. A safe strategy for autonomous vehicles , 2017, 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[18]  Lukas Rummelhard,et al.  Hybrid sampling Bayesian Occupancy Filter , 2014, 2014 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium Proceedings.

[19]  Matthias Althoff,et al.  Model-Based Probabilistic Collision Detection in Autonomous Driving , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[20]  Tiancheng Li,et al.  A Dual PHD Filter for Effective Occupancy Filtering in a Highly Dynamic Environment , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[21]  Graham Mills,et al.  Localization Requirements for Autonomous Vehicles , 2019, SAE International Journal of Connected and Automated Vehicles.

[22]  Klaus C. J. Dietmayer,et al.  A random finite set approach for dynamic occupancy grid maps with real-time application , 2016, Int. J. Robotics Res..