Inhabitants Tracking System in a Cluttered Home Environment Via Floor Load Sensors

Home automation systems should evolve to the next phase in which they are aware of contexts, because providing services based on contexts will upgrade the service quality, thus making people more comfortable and home living more convenient. In particular, location is a piece of important and useful context information for seeking appropriate services, as well as providing them to people living in a home. So far, there have been several studies focused on tracking inhabitants in smart home environments. However, these approaches are often intrusive or require inhabitants to wear some sort of devices, which may make the inhabitants uncomfortable or even inconvenient. This problem could devastate the ultimate goal, which is to provide convenient services, and hence cause such approaches somewhat controversial. In this study, we utilize a number of load sensors together to construct a sensory floor on which exerted pressure can be detected and cover its surface with wooden flooring as in a normal home environment. Although the wooden flooring provides a flat surface for inhabitants to walk on, it also causes clutter in the sensor readings, which lead to difficulty in clearly identifying the location(s) of pressure source(s). Thus, we apply probabilistic data association technique and LeZi-Update approach to analyze the cluttered pressure readings collected by the load sensors so as to determine the positions of the inhabitants, as well as to track their movements. With our nonintrusive approach, there is no need for inhabitants to wear any devices, and this also solves the cross-walking problem in the home environment. Note to Practitioners-This system aims for detecting the location of multiple inhabitants in the home environment. We adopt the sensory floor as our tracking sensor, which consists of many blocks, each with a load cell to collect the human body weight. These blocks are covered with conventional wooden flooring to provide a flat surface on which inhabitants can walk freely. After collecting data, we apply mathematical techniques to analyze them, thus determining inhabitants' locations and tracking their movements. The limitation is that the system cannot differentiate different persons if they have close weight readings, which is the natural limitation of the load cell.

[1]  Yunhao Liu,et al.  ANDMARC: Indoor Location Sensing Using Active RFID , 2003, PerCom.

[2]  Andy Hopper,et al.  The active badge location system , 1992, TOIS.

[3]  Y. Bar-Shalom,et al.  Tracking in a cluttered environment with probabilistic data association , 1975, Autom..

[4]  Li-Chen Fu,et al.  Inhabitants Tracking in a Cluttered Home Environment via Floor Load Sensors , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[5]  Robert Headon,et al.  Recognizing movements from the ground reaction force , 2001, PUI '01.

[6]  Andy Hopper,et al.  The Anatomy of a Context-Aware Application , 1999, Wirel. Networks.

[7]  J. Krumm,et al.  Multi-camera multi-person tracking for EasyLiving , 2000, Proceedings Third IEEE International Workshop on Visual Surveillance.

[8]  Sajal K. Das,et al.  LeZi-Update: An Information-Theoretic Framework for Personal Mobility Tracking in PCS Networks , 2002, Wirel. Networks.

[9]  V. Padmanabhan,et al.  Enhancements to the RADAR User Location and Tracking System , 2000 .

[10]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Movement-based location update and selective paging for PCS networks , 1996, TNET.

[11]  Hironobu Fujiyoshi,et al.  Real-time human motion analysis by image skeletonization , 1998, Proceedings Fourth IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision. WACV'98 (Cat. No.98EX201).

[12]  Zygmunt J. Haas,et al.  Predictive distance-based mobility management for multidimensional PCS networks , 2003, TNET.

[13]  Sajal K. Das,et al.  LeZi-update: an information-theoretic approach to track mobile users in PCS networks , 1999, MobiCom.

[14]  Y. Bar-Shalom Tracking and data association , 1988 .

[15]  Tatsuya Yamazaki,et al.  Ubiquitous home: real-life testbed for home context-aware service , 2005, First International Conference on Testbeds and Research Infrastructures for the DEvelopment of NeTworks and COMmunities.

[16]  Paramvir Bahl,et al.  RADAR: an in-building RF-based user location and tracking system , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).

[17]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  The smart floor: a mechanism for natural user identification and tracking , 2000, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[18]  Arthur Gelb,et al.  Applied Optimal Estimation , 1974 .

[19]  F. Livesey,et al.  The ORL active floor [sensor system] , 1997, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[20]  C. Rose,et al.  Minimizing the average cost of paging and registration: A timer-based method , 1996, Wirel. Networks.

[21]  Hari Balakrishnan,et al.  6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on on Mobile Computing and Networking (ACM MOBICOM ’00) The Cricket Location-Support System , 2022 .

[22]  Seth J. Teller,et al.  The cricket compass for context-aware mobile applications , 2001, MobiCom '01.

[23]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Time synchronization for wireless sensor networks , 2001, Proceedings 15th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium. IPDPS 2001.

[24]  Hari Balakrishnan,et al.  Tracking moving devices with the cricket location system , 2004, MobiSys '04.