Energy efficiency analysis of a chain-based scheme via intra-grid for wireless sensor networks

This study proposes the ideal energy mathematical model for the ideal PEGASIS architecture. Since the distance between nodes is the same, this ideal energy mathematical model can obtain a longer network lifetime than that of the PEGASIS architecture in a WSN. To achieve this objective, the intra-grid PEGASIS architecture, which is architecture that is based on the PEGASIS architecture, is proposed. In the proposed architecture, the sensor area is divided into several network grids, and the nodes of each network grid are deployed at random locations, and the nodes in the network grid are connected. Finally, all of the network grids are connected. The results of a simulation reveal that the energy consumption in each round in the ideal PEGASIS architecture almost equals that in the intra-grid PEGASIS architecture, but the PEGASIS architecture consumes the most energy in each round. Additionally, only a tiny difference is found between the network lifetime of the ideal PEGASIS and that of the intra-grid PEGASIS architecture, and the PEGASIS architecture has the shortest network lifetime.

[1]  Wendi Heinzelman,et al.  Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences- 2000 Energy-Efficient Communication Protocol for Wireless Microsensor Networks , 2022 .

[2]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Connecting the Physical World with Pervasive Networks , 2002, IEEE Pervasive Comput..

[3]  John Anderson,et al.  Wireless sensor networks for habitat monitoring , 2002, WSNA '02.

[4]  Nazrul Islam,et al.  A-sLEACH: An Advanced Solar Aware Leach Protocol for Energy Efficient Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2007, Sixth International Conference on Networking (ICN'07).

[5]  Chin-Ling Chen,et al.  Performance of a data gather scheme with novel chain construction for wireless sensor networks , 2010, IWCMC.

[6]  Andreas Willig,et al.  Recent and Emerging Topics in Wireless Industrial Communications: A Selection , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[7]  Vicky H. Mak-Hau,et al.  Information discovery in mission-critical wireless sensor networks , 2010, Comput. Networks.

[8]  Yi-hua Zhu,et al.  An energy-efficient data gathering algorithm to prolong lifetime of wireless sensor networks , 2010, Comput. Commun..

[9]  Jan M. Rabaey,et al.  Energy aware routing for low energy ad hoc sensor networks , 2002, 2002 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Record. WCNC 2002 (Cat. No.02TH8609).

[10]  Sajal K. Das,et al.  A Weight Based Distributed Clustering Algorithm for Mobile ad hoc Networks , 2000, HiPC.

[11]  Mani Srivastava,et al.  Energy efficient routing in wireless sensor networks , 2001, 2001 MILCOM Proceedings Communications for Network-Centric Operations: Creating the Information Force (Cat. No.01CH37277).

[12]  Matt Welsh,et al.  Deploying a wireless sensor network on an active volcano , 2006, IEEE Internet Computing.

[13]  Krishna M. Sivalingam,et al.  Data Gathering Algorithms in Sensor Networks Using Energy Metrics , 2002, IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst..

[14]  Ying Zhang,et al.  Combs, needles, haystacks: balancing push and pull for discovery in large-scale sensor networks , 2004, SenSys '04.

[15]  Cauligi S. Raghavendra,et al.  PEGASIS: Power-efficient gathering in sensor information systems , 2002, Proceedings, IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[16]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Sensor Networks , 2002, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[17]  Tolga Coplu,et al.  SENDROM: Sensor networks for disaster relief operations management , 2007, Wirel. Networks.

[18]  Guohong Cao,et al.  Minimizing the Cost of Mine Selection Via Sensor Networks , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.

[19]  Ram Ramanathan,et al.  Topology control of multihop wireless networks using transmit power adjustment , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).