Spike-timing-dependent synaptic modification induced by natural spike trains

any tendency for the induced squint itself to cause a visual impairment (strabismic amblyopia) in the deviating eye would actually reduce the likelihood of the nondeprived eye's continuing to dominate the cortex. In six kittens (three MDB and three MDS), visual acuity in the previously deprived eye was determined daily by the jumping-stand method 6,7. Kittens were trained to discriminate between a vertical and a horizontal grating, the spatial frequency of which was increased in accordance with an ascending method of limits. The nondeprived eye was occluded when the previously deprived eye was tested. The visual acuity of the nondeprived eye was also determined during and after the recovery period, either directly or by measurement of the acuity with both eyes open 6. After at least 14 days of recovery, ocular dominance and orientation maps in the primary visual cortex of all ten kittens were obtained by optical imaging of intrinsic signals. For six kittens (three MDB, three MDS), both behavioural tests and optical imaging experiments were performed. Anaesthesia was induced with an intramuscular injection of ketamine (20– 40 mg kg 21) and xylazine (2– 4 mg kg 21). Animals were intubated and artificially ventilated (50– 60% N 2 O, 40 – 50% O 2 , 0.9 – 1.2% halothane). Electrocardiogram, electroencephalogram, end-tidal CO 2 and rectal temperature were monitored continuously. Optical imaging of primary visual cortex was performed as described previously 25. Images were captured with either a cooled slow-scan charge-coupled device camera or an enhanced differential imaging system (ORA 2001 or Imager 2001; Optical Imaging Inc.), with the camera focused ,500 mm below the cortical surface. Visual stimuli, produced by a stimulus generator (VSG; Cambridge Research Systems), consisted of high-contrast, sinusoidally modulated gratings (0.2 –0.6 cycle deg 21) of four different orientations, drifting at a temporal frequency of 2 Hz, presented to the two eyes separately in randomized sequence, interleaved with trials in which the screen was blank. Single-condition responses (averages of 32 – 96 trials per eye and orientation) were divided (1) by responses to the blank screen, and (2) by the sum of responses to all four orientations ('cocktail blank') 25 to obtain iso-orientation maps. Signal amplitude was displayed on an eight-bit greyscale. Ocular-dominance maps were obtained by dividing the sum of responses to all four orientations through one eye by the similar sum of responses through the other eye. Resulting maps were high-pass filtered (cutoff …

[1]  D. Hubel,et al.  Binocular interaction in striate cortex of kittens reared with artificial squint. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  D. Hubel,et al.  Comparison of the effects of unilateral and bilateral eye closure on cortical unit responses in kittens. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Reversal of the physiological effects of monocular deprivation in kittens: further evidence for a sensitive period , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  H. Hirsch,et al.  Consequences of alternating monocular deprivation on eye alignment and convergence in cats. , 1974, Investigative ophthalmology.

[5]  J. Movshon Reversal of the behavioural effects of monocular deprivation in the kitten. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  D. Mitchell,et al.  Recovery from the effects of monocular deprivation in kittens , 1977, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[7]  D E Mitchell,et al.  The rate of recovery of vision after early monocular deprivation in kittens , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Recovery from monocular deprivation in the monkey. I. Reversal of physiological effects in the visual cortex , 1981, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[9]  L. Kempe Handbook of Physiology. Section I. The Nervous System , 1982 .

[10]  E. Bienenstock,et al.  Theory for the development of neuron selectivity: orientation specificity and binocular interaction in visual cortex , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  W. Levy,et al.  Temporal contiguity requirements for long-term associative potentiation/depression in the hippocampus , 1983, Neuroscience.

[12]  J. G. Parnavelas,et al.  Making of the nervous system. , 1986, Nature.

[13]  B. Gustafsson,et al.  Long-term potentiation in the hippocampus using depolarizing current pulses as the conditioning stimulus to single volley synaptic potentials , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  D. Mitchell The extent of visual recovery from early monocular or binocular visual deprivation in kittens. , 1988, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  R. Malach,et al.  Strabismus does not prevent recovery from monocular deprivation: A challenge for simple Hebbian models of synaptic modification , 1989, Visual Neuroscience.

[16]  M. Tigges,et al.  Early abnormal visual experience induces strabismus in infant monkeys. , 1989, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[17]  B. Connors,et al.  Intrinsic firing patterns of diverse neocortical neurons , 1990, Trends in Neurosciences.

[18]  L. Cooper,et al.  Synaptic plasticity in visual cortex: comparison of theory with experiment. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  C. Zorumski,et al.  Properties of vertebrate glutamate receptors: Calcium mobilization and desensitization , 1992, Progress in Neurobiology.

[20]  C Blakemore,et al.  Interocular suppression in the visual cortex of strabismic cats , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[21]  B. Sakmann,et al.  Active propagation of somatic action potentials into neocortical pyramidal cell dendrites , 1994, Nature.

[22]  Mark F. Bear,et al.  Co-regulation of long-term potentiation and experience-dependent synaptic plasticity in visual cortex by age and experience , 1995, Nature.

[23]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Optical Imaging of the Layout of Functional Domains in Area 17 and Across the Area 17/18 Border in Cat Visual Cortex , 1995, The European journal of neuroscience.

[24]  H. Markram,et al.  The neural code between neocortical pyramidal neurons depends on neurotransmitter release probability. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  H. Markram,et al.  Regulation of Synaptic Efficacy by Coincidence of Postsynaptic APs and EPSPs , 1997, Science.

[26]  M. Stryker,et al.  Relationship between the Ocular Dominance and Orientation Maps in Visual Cortex of Monocularly Deprived Cats , 1997, Neuron.

[27]  L. Abbott,et al.  A Quantitative Description of Short-Term Plasticity at Excitatory Synapses in Layer 2/3 of Rat Primary Visual Cortex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  P. Somogyi,et al.  Salient features of synaptic organisation in the cerebral cortex 1 Published on the World Wide Web on 3 March 1998. 1 , 1998, Brain Research Reviews.

[29]  D. Mitchell,et al.  Visual recovery after monocular deprivation is driven by absolute, rather than relative, visually evoked activity levels , 1998, Current Biology.

[30]  L. P. O'Keefe,et al.  Neuronal Correlates of Amblyopia in the Visual Cortex of Macaque Monkeys with Experimental Strabismus and Anisometropia , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Li I. Zhang,et al.  A critical window for cooperation and competition among developing retinotectal synapses , 1998, Nature.

[32]  G. Bi,et al.  Synaptic Modifications in Cultured Hippocampal Neurons: Dependence on Spike Timing, Synaptic Strength, and Postsynaptic Cell Type , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  D. Debanne,et al.  Long‐term synaptic plasticity between pairs of individual CA3 pyramidal cells in rat hippocampal slice cultures , 1998, The Journal of physiology.

[34]  G B Stanley,et al.  Reconstruction of Natural Scenes from Ensemble Responses in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  R. Kempter,et al.  Hebbian learning and spiking neurons , 1999 .

[36]  C. Stevens,et al.  Response of Hippocampal Synapses to Natural Stimulation Patterns , 1999, Neuron.

[37]  R. Zucker Calcium- and activity-dependent synaptic plasticity , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[38]  C. Rittenhouse,et al.  Monocular deprivation induces homosynaptic long-term depression in visual cortex , 1999, Nature.

[39]  R. Nicoll,et al.  Long-term potentiation--a decade of progress? , 1999, Science.

[40]  B. Sakmann,et al.  Coincidence detection and changes of synaptic efficacy in spiny stellate neurons in rat barrel cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[41]  Mark C. W. van Rossum,et al.  Stable Hebbian Learning from Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  L. Abbott,et al.  Competitive Hebbian learning through spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[43]  M. Poo,et al.  Calcium stores regulate the polarity and input specificity of synaptic modification , 2000, Nature.

[44]  D. Feldman,et al.  Timing-Based LTP and LTD at Vertical Inputs to Layer II/III Pyramidal Cells in Rat Barrel Cortex , 2000, Neuron.

[45]  Henry Markram,et al.  An Algorithm for Modifying Neurotransmitter Release Probability Based on Pre- and Postsynaptic Spike Timing , 2001, Neural Computation.

[46]  Y. Dan,et al.  Stimulus Timing-Dependent Plasticity in Cortical Processing of Orientation , 2001, Neuron.

[47]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Spike-Timing-Dependent Hebbian Plasticity as Temporal Difference Learning , 2001, Neural Computation.

[48]  D. Mitchell,et al.  Initial recovery of vision after early monocular deprivation in kittens is faster when both eyes are open , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  J. Lisman,et al.  A Model of Synaptic Memory A CaMKII/PP1 Switch that Potentiates Transmission by Organizing an AMPA Receptor Anchoring Assembly , 2001, Neuron.

[50]  Charlotte A. Boettiger,et al.  Developmentally Restricted Synaptic Plasticity in a Songbird Nucleus Required for Song Learning , 2001, Neuron.

[51]  M. Sur,et al.  Cortical Plasticity: Time For A Change , 2002, Current Biology.

[52]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Brain Mapping: The Methods , 2002 .

[53]  Patrick D. Roberts,et al.  Computational Consequences of Temporally Asymmetric Learning Rules: I. Differential Hebbian Learning , 1999, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[54]  F. Wörgötter,et al.  Quantitative determination of orientational and directional components in the response of visual cortical cells to moving stimuli , 1987, Biological Cybernetics.