Coping with intrinsic constraints of neural origin in the design of rehabilitation robots: A preliminary study

This work proposes a mechatronic solution to increase the backdrivability of a rehabilitation robot in order to cope with intrinsic kinematic constraints which are adopted by the human brain to solve redundancy in motor tasks. In order to reduce the interaction force between the user and the robot and ensure the robot to follow subjects movements a pure force control algorithm has been adopted. The Control law has been validated on the MIT-Manus robotic system: first simulation tests have been performed, and then experimental trials on the real machine have been realized in several operative conditions. A net decrease of human force required to execute a motor task in interaction with the robot has been verified both in simulation tests and experimental validation; this confirms that force control effectively reduce the robot perturbation to subjects intrinsic motor strategies. From these observations it would be possible to define useful indications for the design of a new generation of rehabilitative robots, which comply with constraints of neural origin.

[1]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[2]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[3]  Robert Teasell,et al.  Plasticity and Reorganization of the Brain Post Stroke , 2005, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[4]  T. Vilis,et al.  Geometric relations of eye position and velocity vectors during saccades , 1990, Vision Research.

[5]  Domenico Campolo,et al.  On the kinematics of human wrist during pointing tasks with application to motor rehabilitation , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  Domenico Campolo,et al.  Intrinsic Constraints of Neural Origin: Assessment and Application to Rehabilitation Robotics , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[7]  J. Schaechter.  Motor rehabilitation and brain plasticity after hemiparetic stroke , 2004, Progress in Neurobiology.

[8]  M. Kawato,et al.  Virtual trajectory and stiffness ellipse during multijoint arm movement predicted by neural inverse models , 2005, Biological Cybernetics.

[9]  Richard Volpe,et al.  A theoretical and experimental investigation of explicit force control strategies for manipulators , 1993, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[10]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  Inertial Properties in Robotic Manipulation: An Object-Level Framework , 1995, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[11]  H. Gomi,et al.  Task-Dependent Viscoelasticity of Human Multijoint Arm and Its Spatial Characteristics for Interaction with Environments , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  N. Hogan,et al.  Rehabilitators, Robots, and Guides: New Tools for Neurological Rehabilitation , 2000 .

[13]  T. Flash,et al.  Intrinsic joint kinematic planning. I: Reassessing the Listing’s law constraint in the control of three-dimensional arm movements , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.