Virtual plasma equipment model: a tool for investigating feedback control in plasma processing equipment

As microelectronics device feature sizes continue to shrink and wafers continue to increase in size, it is necessary to have tighter tolerances during the fabrication process to maintain high yields. Feedback control has, therefore, become an important issue in plasma processing equipment design; comprehensive plasma equipment models linked to control algorithms would greatly aid in the investigation and optimal selection of control strategies. This paper reports on a numerical plasma simulation tool, the virtual plasma equipment model (VPEM), which addresses this need to test feedback control strategies and algorithms on plasma processing equipment. The VPEM is an extension of the hybrid plasma equipment model which has been augmented by sensors and actuators, linked together through a programmable controller. The sensors emulate experimental measurements of species densities, fluxes, and energies, while the actuators change process parameters such as pressure, inductive power, capacitive power, electrode voltages, and mole fraction of gases. Controllers were designed using a response surface based methodology. Results are presented from studies in which these controllers were used to compensate for a leak of N/sub 2/ into an Ar discharge, to stably control drifts in process parameters such as pressure and power in Ar and Ar/Cl/sub 2/, and to nullify the effects of long term changes in wall conditions in Cl/sub 2/ containing plasmas. A new strategy for improving the ion energy flux uniformity in capacitively coupled discharges using feedback control techniques is also explored.

[1]  Mark J. Kushner,et al.  Ion drag effects in inductively coupled plasmas for etching , 1996 .

[2]  Mark J. Kushner,et al.  A three-dimensional model for inductively coupled plasma etching reactors: Azimuthal symmetry, coil properties, and comparison to experiments , 1996 .

[3]  P. K. Mozumder,et al.  Statistical feedback control of a plasma etch process , 1994 .

[4]  D. J. Economou,et al.  Factors affecting the Cl atom density in a chlorine discharge , 1992 .

[5]  D. J. Economou,et al.  Two-Dimensional Self-Consistent Radio Frequency Plasma Simulations Relevant to the Gaseous Electronics Conference RF Reference Cell , 1995, Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

[6]  M. Kushner,et al.  Investigation of electron source and ion flux uniformity in high plasma density inductively coupled etching tools using two‐dimensional modeling , 1994 .

[7]  D. Manos,et al.  Plasma etching : an introduction , 1989 .

[8]  Shahid Rauf,et al.  Model for noncollisional heating in inductively coupled plasma processing sources , 1997 .

[9]  M. Kushner,et al.  A semianalytic radio frequency sheath model integrated into a two-dimensional hybrid model for plasma processing reactors , 1997 .

[10]  Costas J. Spanos,et al.  Real-time statistical process control using tool data (semiconductor manufacturing) , 1992 .

[11]  James W. Taylor,et al.  Etching rate characterization of SiO2 and Si using ion energy flux and atomic fluorine density in a CF4/O2/Ar electron cyclotron resonance plasma , 1993 .

[12]  B. A. Rashap,et al.  Sensor systems for real-time feedback control of reactive ion etching , 1996 .

[13]  James Moyne,et al.  Control of semiconductor manufacturing equipment: real-time feedback control of a reactive ion etcher , 1995 .

[14]  Gregory A. Hebner,et al.  An Inductively Coupled Plasma Source for the Gaseous Electronics Conference RF Reference Cell , 1995, Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

[15]  K. Kitamori,et al.  SIMULATIONS OF REAL-TIME CONTROL OF TWO-DIMENSIONAL FEATURES IN INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA SOURCES FOR ETCHING APPLICATIONS , 1995 .