Making the Invisible Visible - Strategies for Visualizing Underground Infrastructures in Immersive Environments

Visualization of underground infrastructure in an interactive 3D immersive environment is extremely important for efficient management of city’s infrastructure. This paper describes different geometric modelling approaches to illustrate appropriate visualization of such data. A multimodal prototype has been developed by exploiting different algorithms to render these invisible underground objects as part of an urban model. This prototype has been integrated in an immersive geographic information system (GIS), named MultiVis, for handheld iOS and Android devices. As a part of the study, three distinct strategies have been tested; the first is based on the use of transparencies to convey a sense of depth, the second relies on an image-space superposition of “ditches” on top of the rendered frame and the third is a world-space deformation of the elevation model that exposes the underground elements. Furthermore, a comparative user experience analysis of different techniques aimed to the geometrically accurate visualisation of utility networks and other underground facilities are performed and evaluated. It includes a set of user evaluations for different parameters of these techniques, which gives us an insight on how the proposed methods affect the experience and usability for technical and non-technical users.

[1]  K. Y. Foo,et al.  Assessing the Condition of Buried Pipe Using Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR) , 2018 .

[2]  Sisi Zlatanova,et al.  MODELLING BELOW- AND ABOVE-GROUND UTILITY NETWORK FEATURES WITH THE CITYGML UTILITY NETWORK ADE: EXPERIENCES FROM ROTTERDAM , 2018, ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences.

[3]  G. Agugiaro,et al.  NETWORK MODELLING AND SEMANTIC 3D CITY MODELS: TESTING THE MATURITY OF THE UTILITY NETWORK ADE FOR CITYGML WITH A WATER NETWORK TEST CASE , 2018, ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences.

[4]  Kangsoo Kim,et al.  Revisiting Trends in Augmented Reality Research: A Review of the 2nd Decade of ISMAR (2008–2017) , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[5]  周安利,et al.  Autodesk , 2018, The Engineer.

[6]  John Ahmet Erkoyuncu,et al.  A systematic review of augmented reality applications in maintenance , 2018 .

[7]  David Greenwood,et al.  Mobile augmented reality applications for construction projects , 2018 .

[8]  C. Rogers,et al.  Embedding sustainability criteria into pre-appraisal of underground utility for future cities , 2017 .

[9]  Ugo Erra,et al.  Applications of mobile augmented reality to water resources management , 2017 .

[10]  Jari Porras,et al.  Data utilization at finnish water and wastewater utilities: Current practices vs. state of the art , 2017 .

[11]  Zhihan Lv,et al.  ARGIS-based outdoor underground pipeline information system , 2016, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[12]  Chiara Delmastro,et al.  Underground urbanism: Master Plans and Sectorial Plans , 2016 .

[13]  G. König,et al.  GENERALIZED CARTOGRAPHIC AND SIMULTANEOUS REPRESENTATION OF UTILITY NETWORKS FOR DECISION-SUPPORT SYSTEMS AND CRISIS MANAGEMENT IN URBAN ENVIRONMENTS , 2015 .

[14]  Agustín Trujillo,et al.  An efficient terrain Level of Detail implementation for mobile devices and performance study , 2015, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[15]  Jinxing Hu,et al.  XEarth: A 3D GIS platform for managing massive city information , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Virtual Environments for Measurement Systems and Applications (CIVEMSA).

[16]  Rafael Rieder,et al.  Virtual Reality Applications for Smart Cities in Health: A Systematic Review , 2015, 2015 XVII Symposium on Virtual and Augmented Reality.

[17]  Shuai Li,et al.  Uncertainty-aware geospatial system for mapping and visualizing underground utilities , 2015 .

[18]  Vineet R. Kamat,et al.  Augmented reality visualization: A review of civil infrastructure system applications , 2015, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[19]  Sangho Lee,et al.  BoreholeAR: A mobile tablet application for effective borehole database visualization using an augmented reality technology , 2015, Comput. Geosci..

[20]  Stefanie Zollmann,et al.  Image-based X-ray visualization techniques for spatial understanding in outdoor augmented reality , 2014, OZCHI.

[21]  Agustin Trujillo,et al.  An Efficient Architecture for Automatic Shaders Management on Virtual Globes , 2014, 2014 Fifth International Conference on Computing for Geospatial Research and Application.

[22]  Anna Corinna Cagliano,et al.  Current trends in Smart City initiatives: some stylised facts , 2014 .

[23]  Stefanie Zollmann,et al.  Smart Vidente: advances in mobile augmented reality for interactive visualization of underground infrastructure , 2013, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[24]  Vineet R. Kamat,et al.  Uncertainty-aware visualization and proximity monitoring in urban excavation: a geospatial augmented reality approach , 2013 .

[25]  W. Broere,et al.  Urban Problems - Underground Solutions , 2012 .

[26]  Patrick Cozzi,et al.  3D Engine Design for Virtual Globes , 2011 .

[27]  Xavier Granier,et al.  On-line visualization of underground structures using context features , 2010, VRST '10.

[28]  Christian Sandor,et al.  Improving Spatial Perception for Augmented Reality X-Ray Vision , 2009, 2009 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference.

[29]  Henry Been-Lirn Duh,et al.  Trends in augmented reality tracking, interaction and display: A review of ten years of ISMAR , 2008, 2008 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[30]  Dieter Schmalstieg,et al.  Handheld Augmented Reality for underground infrastructure visualization , 2008, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[31]  Tobias Höllerer,et al.  Interactive tools for virtual x-ray vision in mobile augmented reality , 2004, Third IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[32]  Morakot Pilouk,et al.  Trends in 3D GIS Development , 2002 .

[33]  SEMANTIC 3D CITY DATA AS VIRTUAL AND AUGMENTED REALITY Urban Energy Modelling , 2020 .

[34]  Xander den Duijn,et al.  A 3D data modeling approach for integrated management of below and above ground utility network features , 2018 .

[35]  Thomas H. Kolbe,et al.  Use Cases and their Requirements on the Semantic Modeling of 3D Supply and Disposal Networks , 2017 .

[36]  Spying the underground visualizing subsurface utilities’ location uncertainties with fuzzy 3D , 2017 .

[37]  Alexander Simons,et al.  Multimodal Location Based Services - Semantic 3D City Data as Virtual and Augmented Reality , 2016, LBS.

[38]  Thomas H. Kolbe,et al.  Extending Semantic 3D City Models by Supply and Disposal Networks for Analysing the Urban Supply Situation , 2016 .

[39]  Sharvari Govilkar,et al.  COMPARATIVE STUDY OF AUGMENTED REALITY SDK’S , 2015 .

[40]  Thomas Becker,et al.  Semantic 3D modeling of multi-utility networks in cities for analysis and 3D visualization , 2013 .

[41]  Patrick Cozzi,et al.  OpenGL Insights : 日本語版 , 2013 .

[42]  Karl-Heinz Häfele,et al.  OGC City Geography Markup Language (CityGML) Encoding Standard , 2012 .

[43]  Semantic 3 D modeling of multi-utility networks in cities for analysis and 3 D visualization , 2012 .

[44]  David S. Ebert,et al.  Texturing & modeling : a procedural approach : 日本語版 , 2009 .

[45]  Sisi Zlatanova,et al.  An Approach for 3D Visualization of Pipelines , 2006, 3D-GIS.

[46]  David L. Elliott,et al.  A Better Activation Function for Artificial Neural Networks , 1993 .