Core geometry in perspective.

Research on animals, infants, children, and adults provides evidence that distinct cognitive systems underlie navigation and object recognition. Here we examine whether and how these systems interact when children interpret 2D edge-based perspectival line drawings of scenes and objects. Such drawings serve as symbols early in development, and they preserve scene and object geometry from canonical points of view. Young children show limits when using geometry both in non-symbolic tasks and in symbolic map tasks that present 3D contexts from unusual, unfamiliar points of view. When presented with the familiar viewpoints in perspectival line drawings, however, do children engage more integrated geometric representations? In three experiments, children successfully interpreted line drawings with respect to their depicted scene or object. Nevertheless, children recruited distinct processes when navigating based on the information in these drawings, and these processes depended on the context in which the drawings were presented. These results suggest that children are flexible but limited in using geometric information to form integrated representations of scenes and objects, even when interpreting spatial symbols that are highly familiar and faithful renditions of the visual world.

[1]  Ken Cheng,et al.  25 years of research on the use of geometry in spatial reorientation: a current theoretical perspective , 2013, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[2]  Anna Shusterman,et al.  Young children's spontaneous use of geometry in maps. , 2008, Developmental science.

[3]  Jonathan M. Campbell,et al.  Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test , 2010 .

[4]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Navigation as a source of geometric knowledge: Young children’s use of length, angle, distance, and direction in a reorientation task , 2012, Cognition.

[5]  Elizabeth S Spelke,et al.  Two-year-old children interpret abstract, purely geometric maps. , 2013, Developmental science.

[6]  N. Newcombe,et al.  Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? squaring theory and evidence , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[8]  Elizabeth S Spelke,et al.  Core foundations of abstract geometry , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  K. Cheng A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation , 1986, Cognition.

[10]  M. Schmuckler,et al.  Picture Perception in Infants: Generalization From Two-Dimensional to Three-Dimensional Displays. , 2011, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[11]  J. Deloache,et al.  Get the picture? The effects of iconicity on toddlers' reenactment from picture books. , 2006, Developmental psychology.

[12]  D. Uttal Seeing the big picture: map use and the development of spatial cognition , 2000 .

[13]  Pierre Pica,et al.  Core knowledge of geometry in an Amazonian indigene group. , 2006, Science.

[14]  Daniel D. Dilks,et al.  The Occipital Place Area Is Causally and Selectively Involved in Scene Perception , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Spontaneous Reorientation Is Guided by Perceived Surface Distance, Not by Image Matching Or Comparison , 2012, PloS one.

[16]  L. J. Chapman,et al.  The measurement of differential deficit. , 1978, Journal of psychiatric research.

[17]  Daniel D. Dilks,et al.  Mirror-Image Sensitivity and Invariance in Object and Scene Processing Pathways , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  R H Day,et al.  Visual shape perception in early infancy. , 1979, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[19]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  What Line Drawings Reveal About the Visual Brain , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[20]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Beyond Core Knowledge: Natural Geometry , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[21]  Judy S. DeLoache,et al.  Picture perception in infancy , 1979 .

[22]  I. Biederman,et al.  Surface versus edge-based determinants of visual recognition , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  Linda B. Smith From Fragments to Geometric Shape , 2009, Current directions in psychological science.

[24]  I. Biederman,et al.  Evidence for Complete Translational and Reflectional Invariance in Visual Object Priming , 1991, Perception.

[25]  Michael McCloskey,et al.  Mirror-image confusions: Implications for representation and processing of object orientation , 2010, Cognition.

[26]  Marina Vasilyeva,et al.  Children's use of geometric information in mapping tasks. , 2006, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[27]  Judy S. DeLoache,et al.  Transfer between Picture Books and the Real World by Very Young Children , 2008 .

[28]  J. O’Keefe,et al.  Geometric determinants of the place fields of hippocampal neurons , 1996, Nature.

[29]  J. Deloache Rapid change in the symbolic functioning of very young children. , 1987, Science.

[30]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[31]  John M. Kennedy,et al.  Outline Picture Perception by the Songe of Papua , 1975 .

[32]  J. Deloache Becoming symbol-minded , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  Location representation in enclosed spaces: what types of information afford young children an advantage? , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[34]  Irving Biederman,et al.  17000 Years of Depicting the Junction of Two Smooth Shapes , 2008, Perception.

[35]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Young Children Reorient by Computing Layout Geometry, Not by Matching Images of the Environment , 2010 .

[36]  E. Spelke,et al.  Modularity and development: the case of spatial reorientation , 1996, Cognition.

[37]  A. Oliva,et al.  From Blobs to Boundary Edges: Evidence for Time- and Spatial-Scale-Dependent Scene Recognition , 1994 .

[38]  Li Fei-Fei,et al.  Simple line drawings suffice for functional MRI decoding of natural scene categories , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Is there an innate geometric module? Effects of experience with angular geometric cues on spatial re-orientation based on the shape of the environment , 2007, Animal Cognition.

[40]  S. Carey,et al.  Do Both Pictures and Words Function as Symbols for 18- and 24-Month-Old Children? , 2004 .

[41]  Picturing objects in infancy. , 2014, Child development.

[42]  J. Deloache,et al.  The Origins of Pictorial Competence , 2003 .

[43]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Core systems of geometry in animal minds , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[44]  Elizabeth S Spelke,et al.  Core Knowledge and the Emergence of Symbols: The Case of Maps , 2015, Journal of cognition and development : official journal of the Cognitive Development Society.

[45]  H. Wellman,et al.  Young Children's Representation of Spatial Information Acquired From Maps , 1989 .

[46]  J. Deloache,et al.  Grasping the Nature of Pictures , 1998 .

[47]  J. Deloache Symbolic functioning in very young children: understanding of pictures and models. , 1991, Child development.

[48]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  Coding location in enclosed spaces: is geometry the principle? , 2007, Developmental science.

[49]  Barbara Landau,et al.  Object recognition with severe spatial deficits in Williams syndrome: sparing and breakdown , 2006, Cognition.

[50]  Pierre Pica,et al.  Flexible intuitions of Euclidean geometry in an Amazonian indigene group , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  D. Gentner,et al.  Developmental changes in children's understanding of the similarity between photographs and their referents. , 2008, Developmental science.

[52]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  Illusory contours and cortical neuron responses. , 1984, Science.

[53]  Susan N. Friel,et al.  Making sense of graphs: Critical factors influencing comprehension and instructional implications. , 2001 .

[54]  Janellen Huttenlocher,et al.  How toddlers represent enclosed spaces , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[55]  D. Uttal Angles and distances: children's and adults' reconstruction and scaling of spatial configurations. , 1996, Child development.

[56]  Thomas J. Wills,et al.  Development of the Hippocampal Cognitive Map in Preweanling Rats , 2010, Science.

[57]  Barbara Landau,et al.  Spatial representation across species: geometry, language, and maps , 2009, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[58]  E. Gombrich ART AND ILLUSION: A STUDY IN THE PSYCHOLOGY OF PICTORIAL REPRESENTATION. , 1960 .

[59]  Russell A. Epstein,et al.  The Parahippocampal Place Area Recognition, Navigation, or Encoding? , 1999, Neuron.

[60]  HighWire Press Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 1781, The London Medical Journal.

[61]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  A modular geometric mechanism for reorientation in children , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[62]  B. Landau,et al.  “What” and “where” in spatial language and spatial cognition , 1993 .