Positive predictive values of the coding for bisphosphonate therapy among cancer patients in the Danish National Patient Registry

Background The purpose of this study was to estimate the positive predictive value (PPV) of the coding for bisphosphonate treatment in selected cancer patients from the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR). Methods Through the DNPR, we identified all patients with recorded cancer of the breast, prostate, lung, kidney, and with multiple myeloma. We restricted the study sample to patients with bisphosphonate treatment recorded during an admission to Aalborg Hospital, Denmark, from 2005 through 2009. We retrieved and reviewed medical records of these patients from the initial cancer diagnosis onwards to confirm or rule out bisphosphonate therapy. We calculated the PPV of the treatment coding as the proportion of patients with confirmed bisphosphonate treatment. Results We retrieved and reviewed the medical records of 60 cancer patients with treatment codes corresponding to bisphosphonate therapy. Recorded code corresponded to treatment administered intravenously for 59 of 60 patients, corresponding to a PPV of 98.3% (95% confidence interval 92.5–99.8). In the remaining patient, bisphosphonate treatment was also confirmed but was an orally administered bisphosphonate; thus, the treatment for any bisphosphonate regardless of administration was confirmed for all 60 patients (PPV of 100%, 95% confidence interval 95.9–100.0). Conclusion The PPV of bisphosphonate treatment coding among cancer patients in the DNPR is very high and the recorded treatment nearly always corresponds to intravenous administration.

[1]  L. Brown,et al.  Interval Estimation for a Binomial Proportion , 2001 .

[2]  H. Sørensen,et al.  Intravenous bisphosphonate therapy and atrial fibrillation/flutter risk in cancer patients: a nationwide cohort study , 2011, British Journal of Cancer.

[3]  J. Baron,et al.  An introduction to epidemiological research with medical databases. , 2000, Annals of epidemiology.

[4]  M. Brundage,et al.  Managing skeletal related events resulting from bone metastases , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  H. Sørensen,et al.  Incidence of bone metastases and skeletal-related events in breast cancer patients: A population-based cohort study in Denmark , 2011, BMC Cancer.

[6]  N. Watts,et al.  Bisphosphonates and osteonecrosis of the jaw. , 2006, Annals of internal medicine.

[7]  T. Nickelsen,et al.  [Data validity and coverage in the Danish National Health Registry. A literature review]. , 2001, Ugeskrift for laeger.

[8]  H T Sorensen,et al.  A framework for evaluation of secondary data sources for epidemiological research. , 1996, International journal of epidemiology.

[9]  C. Dethlefsen,et al.  Venous thromboembolism discharge diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Registry should be used with caution. , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[10]  T. F. Andersen,et al.  The Danish National Hospital Register. A valuable source of data for modern health sciences. , 1999, Danish medical bulletin.

[11]  E. McCloskey,et al.  Bisphosphonates in oncology. , 2011, Bone.

[12]  Timothy L Lash,et al.  The predictive value of ICD-10 diagnostic coding used to assess Charlson comorbidity index conditions in the population-based Danish National Registry of Patients , 2011, BMC medical research methodology.

[13]  A. Molino,et al.  Renal toxicity and osteonecrosis of the jaw in cancer patients treated with bisphosphonates: a long-term retrospective analysis , 2010, Medical oncology.

[14]  K. Rostgaard,et al.  [The national patient registry. Evaluation of data quality]. , 1995, Ugeskrift for laeger.