Driving Assessment of Students’ Explanations in Game Dialog Using Computer-Adaptive Testing and Hidden Markov Modeling

How might research on metacognition, conceptual change, and students’ explanations inform the design of dialog systems in digital games to foster science learning and engagement? How might research on computer-adaptive testing (CAT) and hidden Markov modeling support online diagnostic modeling of students’ learning behaviors and understanding? How might a game analyze their problem-solving steps as well as explanation constructs in that dialog? This chapter explores these questions. Our goals involve (1) scaffolding students’ explicit articulation of connections between intuitive understandings and disciplinary concepts in the game environment while (2) providing mechanisms for online tracking of players’ evolving understanding to support adaptive scaffolding and provide formative and summative diagnostic information to teachers and researchers. Essentially, we propose that integrating research on conceptual change, scientific explanations, metacognition, CAT, and hidden Markov modeling in a digital game environment could simultaneously diagnose the formative and summative aspects of students’ understanding, and in this process provide an environment that fosters deep science learning. We first define the challenge of scaffolding deep learning in games at the cognitive level by contrasting constraint-based reasoning and model-based reasoning. We then explore the role of self-explanation in supporting model-based reasoning and dynamic assessment of students’ reasoning. This is followed by an outline of a model for game-based dialog to support explanation generation and analysis. This explanation dialog model leverages CAT techniques and hidden Markov modeling to develop and refine an ongoing analysis of a students’ understanding within the game based on students’ explanations within the dialog and their other actions within the game.

[1]  Yasmin B. Kafai,et al.  Beyond Barbie and Mortal Kombat: New Perspectives on Gender and Gaming , 2008 .

[2]  Brian C. Nelson,et al.  Design-based Research Strategies for Developing a Scientific Inquiry Curriculum in a Multi-User Virtual Environment , 2005 .

[3]  D. Haussler,et al.  Hidden Markov models in computational biology. Applications to protein modeling. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  J. Bransford,et al.  How students learn : history, mathematics, and science in the classroom , 2005 .

[5]  M. Honey,et al.  Learning Science through Computer Games and Simulations. , 2011 .

[6]  J. Huizinga Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture , 1938 .

[7]  D. Olson,et al.  The Handbook of education and human development : new models of learning, teaching, and schooling , 1996 .

[8]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students , 1998 .

[9]  Matthew W. Lewis,et al.  Self-Explonations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[10]  Brian C. Nelson,et al.  Exploring Newtonian mechanics in a conceptually-integrated digital game: Comparison of learning and affective outcomes for students in Taiwan and the United States , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[11]  Mark J. Gierl,et al.  Defining and Evaluating Models of Cognition Used in Educational Measurement to Make Inferences about Examinees' Thinking Processes. , 2007 .

[12]  Pratim Sengupta,et al.  Lowering the Learning Threshold: Multi-Agent-Based Models and Learning Electricity: Cognitive Tool for Scientific Inquiry , 2011 .

[13]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Handbook of self-regulation , 2000 .

[14]  P. Pintrich The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. , 2000 .

[15]  R. Mayer,et al.  Engaging students in active learning: The case for personalized multimedia messages. , 2000 .

[16]  R. Mayer,et al.  Personalized messages that promote science learning in virtual environments , 2004 .

[17]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  LEARNING BY TEACHING: A NEW AGENT PARADIGM FOR EDUCATIONAL SOFTWARE , 2005, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[18]  B. D. Coller,et al.  Effectiveness of using a video game to teach a course in mechanical engineering , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[19]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Interactive Metacognition: Monitoring and Regulating a Teachable Agent , 2009 .

[20]  Douglas Clark,et al.  Hands-on Investigation in Internet Environments: Teaching Thermal Equilibrium , 2013 .

[21]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Coupled hidden Markov models for complex action recognition , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[22]  David Palmer,et al.  The POE in the primary school: An evaluation , 1995 .

[23]  Jean Fisher,et al.  Dream Machines , 2000 .

[24]  Daniel P. Shepardson,et al.  The impact of a science demonstration on children's understandings of air pressure , 1994 .

[25]  Douglas J. Hacker,et al.  Handbook of Metacognition in Education , 2009 .

[26]  Richard M. Luecht,et al.  Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing in a Certification or Licensure Context , 1996 .

[27]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: The Self-Explanation Principle in Multimedia Learning , 2005 .

[28]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Relations between Types of Reasoning and Computational Representations , 2004, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[29]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  Modeling and Measuring Self-Regulated Learning in Teachable Agent Environments , 2010, AAAI Fall Symposium: Cognitive and Metacognitive Educational Systems.

[30]  B. Zimmerman Theories of Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview and Analysis , 2001 .

[31]  C. Liew,et al.  The effectiveness of predict-observe-explain technique in diagnosing students' understanding of science and identifying their level of achievement , 2004 .

[32]  Mykola Pechenizkiy,et al.  Handbook of Educational Data Mining , 2010 .

[33]  A. diSessa Toward an Epistemology of Physics , 1993 .

[34]  Brian C. Nelson,et al.  Exploring Cognitive Load in Immersive Educational Games: The SAVE Science Project , 2010, Int. J. Gaming Comput. Mediat. Simulations.

[35]  Michael Barnett,et al.  Using Video Games to Support Pre-Service Elementary Teachers Learning of Basic Physics Principles , 2011 .

[36]  Jonathan P. Rowe,et al.  The effects of empathetic virtual characters on presence in narrative-centered learning environments , 2008, CHI.

[37]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. , 2008 .

[38]  Kurt Squire,et al.  Mad City Mystery: Developing Scientific Argumentation Skills with a Place-based Augmented Reality Game on Handheld Computers , 2007 .

[39]  Brian C. Nelson Exploring the Use of Individualized, Reflective Guidance In an Educational Multi-User Virtual Environment , 2007 .

[40]  Kurt Squire,et al.  Augmented Reality Simulations on Handheld Computers , 2007 .

[41]  Jeffrey Mervis,et al.  Adding a T to the Three R's , 2009, Science.

[42]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Transformational Play as a Curricular Scaffold: Using Videogames to Support Science Education , 2009 .

[43]  Ibrahim Khatete Innovations in Science and Mathematics Education , 2005 .

[44]  Daniel Wendel,et al.  The Simulation Cycle: Combining Games, Simulations, Engineering and Science Using StarLogo TNG , 2009 .

[45]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Chapter 3: Rethinking Transfer: A Simple Proposal With Multiple Implications , 1999 .

[46]  J. Minstrell Explaining the ’’at rest’’ condition of an object , 1982 .

[47]  Robert A. Reiser,et al.  Trends and issues in instructional design and technology , 2002 .

[48]  Douglas B. Clark,et al.  Personally‐Seeded Discussions to Scaffold Online Argumentation , 2007 .

[49]  F. Lord Applications of Item Response Theory To Practical Testing Problems , 1980 .

[50]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Training in Self-Explanation and Self-Regulation Strategies: Investigating the Effects of Knowledge Acquisition Activities on Problem Solving , 1995 .

[51]  R. Hambleton,et al.  Item Response Theory , 1984, The History of Educational Measurement.

[52]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-regulated learning and academic achievement : theoretical perspectives , 2001 .

[53]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  Technology support for complex problem solving: from SAD environments to AI , 2001 .

[54]  Ruth Wylie,et al.  The Self-Explanation Principle in Multimedia Learning , 2014 .

[55]  Alan Amory,et al.  Game object model version II: a theoretical framework for educational game development , 2007 .

[56]  James Paul Gee,et al.  What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy , 2007, CIE.

[57]  Biing-Hwang Juang,et al.  Hidden Markov Models for Speech Recognition , 1991 .

[58]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  Models of magnetism , 1998 .

[59]  L. E. Klopfer,et al.  Cognitive research and the design of science instruction , 1982 .

[60]  N. Webb Peer interaction and learning in small groups , 1989 .

[61]  E. Dieterle,et al.  Neomillennial Learning Styles and River City , 2023, Children, Youth and Environments.

[62]  Valerie J. Shute,et al.  Games, Learning, and Assessment , 2012 .

[63]  Caroline Pelletier Gaming in Context: How Young People Construct Their Gendered Identities in Playing and Making Games , 2008 .

[64]  Matthew Kearney,et al.  Classroom Use of Multimedia-Supported Predict–Observe–Explain Tasks in a Social Constructivist Learning Environment , 2004 .

[65]  Yasmin B. Kafai,et al.  Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Learning sciences , 2004 .

[66]  Yasmin B. Kafai,et al.  Investigating the ‘‘Why’’ in Whypox , 2009, Games Cult..

[67]  Diana G. Oblinger Games and Learning. , 2006 .

[68]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Designing for Knowledge Integration: The Impact of Instructional Time , 2003 .

[69]  Cheryl I. Johnson,et al.  Adding Instructional Features That Promote Learning in a Game-Like Environment , 2010 .

[70]  Douglas B. Clark,et al.  Comparison of Students' Knowledge Structure Coherence and Understanding of Force in the Philippines, Turkey, China, Mexico, and the United States , 2011 .

[71]  Brian C. Nelson,et al.  Presence and Middle School Students' Participation in a Virtual Game Environment to Assess Science Inquiry , 2012, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[72]  Martha L. Stocking,et al.  CASE STUDIES IN COMPUTER ADAPTIVE TEST DESIGN THROUGH SIMULATION1,2 , 1993 .

[73]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Scaffolding knowledge integration through curricular depth , 2000 .

[74]  James Minogue,et al.  Investigating the impact of video games on high school students' engagement and learning about genetics , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[75]  William A. Sands,et al.  Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation. , 1997 .

[76]  M. Chi,et al.  The Content of Physics Self-Explanations , 1991 .

[77]  S. Barab,et al.  Eat Your Vegetables and Do Your Homework: A Design­ Based Investigation of Enjoyment and Meaning in Learning , 2005 .

[78]  Cen Li,et al.  Applying the Hidden Markov Model Methodology for Unsupervised Learning of Temporal Data , 2002 .

[79]  S. Herring,et al.  Situationally embodied curriculum: Relating formalisms and contexts , 2007 .

[80]  M. Hilton Exploring the Intersection of Science Education and 21st Century Skills: A Workshop Summary , 2010 .

[81]  Yaacov Schul,et al.  On the Cognitive Benefits of Teaching , 1980 .

[82]  Sean C. Duncan,et al.  Scientific Habits of Mind in Virtual Worlds , 2008 .

[83]  Brian C. Nelson,et al.  A Multi-user virtual environment for building higher order inquiry skills in science , 2006 .

[84]  Y. Kafai,et al.  Children’s Participation in a Virtual Epidemic in the Science Classroom: Making Connections to Natural Infectious Diseases , 2006, Journal of science education and technology.

[85]  Lawrence R. Rabiner,et al.  A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition , 1989, Proc. IEEE.

[86]  R. Azevedo Theoretical, conceptual, methodological, and instructional issues in research on metacognition and self-regulated learning: A discussion , 2009 .

[87]  J. McGonigal Reality Is Broken: Why Games Make Us Better and How They Can Change the World , 2011 .

[88]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Inventing to Prepare for Future Learning: The Hidden Efficiency of Encouraging Original Student Production in Statistics Instruction , 2004 .

[89]  Kurt Squire,et al.  Design Principles of Next-Generation Digital Gaming for Education. , 2003 .

[90]  Daniel O. Segall,et al.  Multidimensional adaptive testing , 1996 .

[91]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Internet Environments for Science Education , 2004 .

[92]  Dirk Ifenthaler,et al.  Assessment in Game-Based Learning: Foundations, Innovations, and Perspectives , 2012 .

[93]  R. Linn Educational measurement, 3rd ed. , 1989 .

[94]  Daniel T. Hickey,et al.  Designing Assessments and Assessing Designs in Virtual Educational Environments , 2009 .

[95]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  Measuring Self-Regulated Learning Skills through Social Interactions in a teachable Agent Environment , 2010, Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanc. Learn..

[96]  Richard Gunstone,et al.  The Process of Conceptual Change in 'Force and Motion'. , 1997 .

[97]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implica-tions , 1999 .

[98]  J. Michael Spector,et al.  Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 3rd Edition , 2012 .

[99]  John S. Kinnebrew,et al.  A Contextualized, Differential Sequence Mining Method to Derive Students' Learning Behavior Patterns , 2013, EDM 2013.

[100]  Ramakrishnan Srikant,et al.  Mining sequential patterns , 1995, Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Data Engineering.

[101]  N. Webb,et al.  Productive Helping in Cooperative Groups , 2002 .

[102]  Kent J. Crippen,et al.  Promoting Self-Regulation in Science Education: Metacognition as Part of a Broader Perspective on Learning , 2006 .

[103]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  Mining Student Behavior Models in Learning-by-Teaching Environments , 2008, EDM.

[104]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience , 1990 .

[105]  Douglas B. Clark Longitudinal Conceptual Change in Students' Understanding of Thermal Equilibrium: An Examination of the Process of Conceptual Restructuring , 2006 .

[106]  D. Borsboom Educational Measurement (4th ed.) , 2009 .

[107]  T. Anderson,et al.  Design-Based Research , 2012 .

[108]  K. Squire Changing the Game: What Happens When Video Games Enter the Classroom? , 2005 .

[109]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  Designing Learning by Teaching Agents: The Betty's Brain System , 2008, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[110]  John C. Nesbit,et al.  Sequential Pattern Analysis of Learning Logs: Methodology and Applications , 2010 .

[111]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning: Theory, Research, and Applications , 2009 .

[112]  Michael Barnett,et al.  Electromagnetism Supercharged! Learning Physics with Digital Simulation Games , 2004, ICLS.

[113]  Richard Gunstone,et al.  Conceptual Change and Physics Instruction: A Longitudinal Study. , 1990 .

[114]  K. McGilly,et al.  Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice. , 1994 .

[115]  James W Pellegrino,et al.  Technology and Testing , 2009, Science.

[116]  D. Treagust,et al.  A Predict-Observe-Explain Teaching Sequence for Learning about Students' Understanding of Heat and Expansion Liquids. , 1995 .

[117]  Cornelis A.W. Glas,et al.  Statistical Tests of Conditional Independence Between Responses and/or Response Times on Test Items , 2010 .

[118]  Glenda A. Gunter,et al.  Taking educational games seriously: using the RETAIN model to design endogenous fantasy into standalone educational games , 2008 .

[119]  Audrey B. Champagne,et al.  The National Science Education Standards. , 2000 .

[120]  Chris Dede,et al.  Making Learning Meaningful: An explatory study of using multi-user environments (MUVEs) in middle school science. , 2005 .

[121]  Tai Yu Lin,et al.  Smart Machines in Education , 2002, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[122]  S. Barab,et al.  Relating Narrative, Inquiry, and Inscriptions: Supporting Consequential Play , 2007 .

[123]  Richard Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[124]  Yoon Jeon Kim,et al.  Formative and Stealth Assessment , 2014 .

[125]  D. Bub,et al.  Video‐game training and naïve reasoning about object motion , 2009 .