Effects of adaptation on the stimulus selectivity of macaque inferior temporal spiking activity and local field potentials.

Stimulus repetition reduces neural response in cortical areas. Such adaptation is used in functional magnetic resonance imaging to infer the selectivity of neuronal populations; however, the mechanisms of adaptation remain elusive, especially in higher areas. We measured adaptation of spiking activity and local field potentials (LFPs) in macaque inferior temporal (IT) cortex for parameterized shapes by comparing tuning for test stimuli following a brief adaptation with predictions derived from different models of adaptation. Adaptation was similar during passive fixation or an attention-demanding task. We found consistent adaptation of spiking activity and LFP power in high- (gamma) but not low-frequency bands when repeating shapes. Contrary to sharpening models, repetition did not affect shape selectivity. The degree of similarity between adapter and test shapes was a stronger determinant of adaptation than was the response to the adapter. Adaptation still occurred when adapter and test stimuli did not spatially overlap, but adaptation was stronger for same, compared with different, adapters and test stimulus positions. These adaptation effects were similar for spiking and for gamma activity. In conclusion, adaptation of IT spiking activity and LFPs in IT is strongly dependent on feature similarities in the adapter and test stimuli, in agreement with input, but not firing-rate fatigue models.

[1]  G L Gerstein,et al.  Single-unit activity in temporal association cortex of the monkey. , 1967, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  D. B. Bender,et al.  Visual Receptive Fields of Neurons in Inferotemporal Cortex of the Monkey , 1969, Science.

[3]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[4]  P. Dean Effects of inferotemporal lesions on the behavior of monkeys. , 1976, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  P. Lennie,et al.  Pattern-selective adaptation in visual cortical neurones , 1979, Nature.

[6]  U. Mitzdorf Properties of the evoked potential generators: current source-density analysis of visually evoked potentials in the cat cortex. , 1987, The International journal of neuroscience.

[7]  E. Miller,et al.  Habituation-like decrease in the responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex of the macaque , 1991, Visual Neuroscience.

[8]  R. Desimone,et al.  A neural mechanism for working and recognition memory in inferior temporal cortex. , 1991, Science.

[9]  I. Riches,et al.  The effects of visual stimulation and memory on neurons of the hippocampal formation and the neighboring parahippocampal gyrus and inferior temporal cortex of the primate , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  R. Desimone,et al.  The representation of stimulus familiarity in anterior inferior temporal cortex. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  R. Desimone,et al.  Inferior temporal mechanisms for invariant object recognition. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  G. Orban,et al.  How task-related are the responses of inferior temporal neurons? , 1995, Visual Neuroscience.

[13]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms for visual memory and their role in attention. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  J. Ringo Stimulus specific adaptation in inferior temporal and medial temporal cortex of the monkey , 1996, Behavioural Brain Research.

[15]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. , 1996, Annual review of neuroscience.

[16]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  Visual object recognition. , 1996, Annual review of neuroscience.

[17]  L. Abbott,et al.  Synaptic Depression and Cortical Gain Control , 1997, Science.

[18]  J. Pernier,et al.  Oscillatory γ-Band (30–70 Hz) Activity Induced by a Visual Search Task in Humans , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Alex Martin,et al.  Properties and mechanisms of perceptual priming , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[20]  P. Lennie,et al.  Rapid adaptation in visual cortex to the structure of images. , 1999, Science.

[21]  E. Miller,et al.  Effects of Visual Experience on the Representation of Objects in the Prefrontal Cortex , 2000, Neuron.

[22]  Alex Martin,et al.  Long-lasting cortical plasticity in the object naming system , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Cortical Regions Involved in Perceiving Object Shape , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal , 2001, Nature.

[25]  R. Vogels,et al.  Inferotemporal neurons represent low-dimensional configurations of parameterized shapes , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  N. Logothetis The Underpinnings of the BOLD Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signal , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Patrik Vuilleumier,et al.  Effects of attention and emotion on repetition priming and their modulation by cholinergic enhancement. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Representation of the perceived 3-D object shape in the human lateral occipital complex. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  E. Wojciulik,et al.  Attention increases neural selectivity in the human lateral occipital complex , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  J. Movshon,et al.  Adaptation changes the direction tuning of macaque MT neurons , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  R. Henson,et al.  BOLD repetition decreases in object-responsive ventral visual areas depend on spatial attention. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  E. Rolls,et al.  Responses of neurons in the inferior temporal cortex in short term and serial recognition memory tasks , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  J. Ringo,et al.  Investigation of long term recognition and association memory in unit responses from inferotemporal cortex , 1993, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  The Processing of Visual Shape in the Cerebral Cortex of Human and Nonhuman Primates: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  Zoe Kourtzi,et al.  Implied motion from form in the human visual cortex. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  Svetlana S. Georgieva,et al.  Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Assess Adaptation and Size Invariance of Shape Processing by Humans and Monkeys , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  I. Fried,et al.  Coupling Between Neuronal Firing, Field Potentials, and fMRI in Human Auditory Cortex , 2005, Science.

[38]  I. Biederman,et al.  Tuning for shape dimensions in macaque inferior temporal cortex , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[39]  W. Singer,et al.  Hemodynamic Signals Correlate Tightly with Synchronized Gamma Oscillations , 2005, Science.

[40]  I. Fujita,et al.  Organization of horizontal axons in the inferior temporal cortex and primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  E. Miller,et al.  Experience-dependent sharpening of visual shape selectivity in inferior temporal cortex. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[43]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Repetition‐induced changes in BOLD response reflect accumulation of neural activity , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[44]  R. Kiani,et al.  Microstimulation of inferotemporal cortex influences face categorization , 2006, Nature.

[45]  G. Orban,et al.  Selectivity of Neuronal Adaptation Does Not Match Response Selectivity: A Single-Cell Study of the fMRI Adaptation Paradigm , 2006, Neuron.

[46]  W. Newsome,et al.  Local Field Potential in Cortical Area MT: Stimulus Tuning and Behavioral Correlations , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  T. Poggio,et al.  Object Selectivity of Local Field Potentials and Spikes in the Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex , 2006, Neuron.

[48]  A. Kohn Visual adaptation: physiology, mechanisms, and functional benefits. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[49]  Michael W. L. Chee,et al.  Inter-relationships between attention, activation, fMR adaptation and long-term memory , 2007, NeuroImage.

[50]  C. Olson,et al.  Repetition suppression in monkey inferotemporal cortex: relation to behavioral priming. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[51]  R. Freeman,et al.  Neurometabolic coupling in cerebral cortex reflects synaptic more than spiking activity , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[52]  N. Logothetis,et al.  A combined MRI and histology atlas of the rhesus monkey brain in stereotaxic coordinates , 2007 .

[53]  R. Vogels,et al.  Properties of shape tuning of macaque inferior temporal neurons examined using rapid serial visual presentation. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[54]  Valentin Dragoi,et al.  Adaptive coding of visual information in neural populations , 2008, Nature.

[55]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  Effects of familiarity on neural activity in monkey inferior temporal lobe. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[56]  R. Vogels,et al.  Effects of Category Learning on the Stimulus Selectivity of Macaque References , 2022 .

[57]  Jim M. Monti,et al.  Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[58]  Christopher J. Aura,et al.  Divergence of fMRI and neural signals in V1 during perceptual suppression in the awake monkey , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[59]  Arthur Gretton,et al.  Low-Frequency Local Field Potentials and Spikes in Primary Visual Cortex Convey Independent Visual Information , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[60]  A. Thiele,et al.  Comparison of spatial integration and surround suppression characteristics in spiking activity and the local field potential in macaque V1 , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[61]  Nikos K. Logothetis,et al.  The effect of a serotonin-induced dissociation between spiking and perisynaptic activity on BOLD functional MRI , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  Joris Vangeneugden,et al.  Stimulus Similarity-Contingent Neural Adaptation Can Be Time and Cortical Area Dependent , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[63]  Ernst Niebur,et al.  Effect of Stimulus Intensity on the Spike–Local Field Potential Relationship in the Secondary Somatosensory Cortex , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[64]  Kalanit Grill-Spector,et al.  The representation of object viewpoint in human visual cortex , 2009, NeuroImage.

[65]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  Neural Dynamics in Inferior Temporal Cortex during a Visual Working Memory Task , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[66]  Yan Liu,et al.  Time course and stimulus dependence of repetition-induced response suppression in inferotemporal cortex. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.