Merging intelligent agency and the Semantic Web

The Semantic Web makes unique demands on agency. Such agents should: be built around an ontology and should take advantage of the relations in it, be based on a grounded approach to uncertainty, be able to deal naturally with the issue of semantic alignment, and deal with interaction in a way that is suited to the co-ordination of services. A new breed of 'information-based' intelligent agents [C. Sierra, J. Debenham, Information-based agency, in: Proceedings of Twentieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence IJCAI-07, Hyderabad, India, 2007, pp. 1513-1518.] meets these demands. This form of agency is founded on ideas from information theory, and was inspired by the insight that interaction is an information revelation and discovery process. Ontologies are fundamental to these agent's reasoning that relies on semantic distance measures. They employ entropy-based inference, a form of Bayesian inference, to manage uncertainty that they represent using probability distributions. Semantic alignment is managed through a negotiation process during which the agent's uncertain beliefs are continually revised. The co-ordination of services is achieved by modelling interaction as time-constrained, resource-constrained processes - a proven application of agent technology. In addition, measures of trust, reputation, and reliability are unified in a single model.

[1]  Carles Sierra,et al.  The LOGIC negotiation model , 2007, AAMAS '07.

[2]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiations , 2002, Artif. Intell..

[3]  Carles Sierra,et al.  Trust and honour in information-based agency , 2006, AAMAS '06.

[4]  David McLean,et al.  An Approach for Measuring Semantic Similarity between Words Using Multiple Information Sources , 2003, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[5]  Carles Sierra,et al.  Information-Based Agency , 2007, IJCAI.

[6]  David J. C. MacKay,et al.  Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[7]  Pablo Noriega,et al.  Engineering open environments with electronic institutions , 2005, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[8]  U. von Toussaint,et al.  Bayesian inference and maximum entropy methods in science and engineering , 2004 .

[9]  Pablo Noriega,et al.  Environment Engineering for Multiagent Systems , 2004 .

[10]  Peter Cheeseman,et al.  On The Relationship between Bayesian and Maximum Entropy Inference , 2004 .

[11]  Jeffrey S. Rosenschein and Gilad Zlotkin Rules of Encounter , 1994 .

[12]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Negotiation and Cooperation in Multi-Agent Environments , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[13]  N. R. Jennings,et al.  To appear in: Int Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation GDN2000 Keynote Paper Automated Negotiation: Prospects, Methods and Challenges , 2022 .

[14]  Wendy Hall,et al.  Creating a Science of the Web , 2006, Science.

[15]  John K. Debenham,et al.  A multiagent system manages collaboration in emergent processes , 2005, AAMAS '05.

[16]  Jeff B. Paris Common Sense and Maximum Entropy , 2004, Synthese.

[17]  John K. Debenham Bargaining with information , 2004, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..

[18]  Yannis Kalfoglou,et al.  Centre for Intelligent Systems and Their Applications , 2006 .

[19]  James A. Hendler,et al.  A Framework for Web Science , 2006, Found. Trends Web Sci..

[20]  James A. Hendler,et al.  A Framework for Web Science (Foundations and Trends(R) in Web Science) , 2006 .