Characterizing ensemble statistics: mean size is represented across multiple frames of reference

The visual system represents the overall statistical, not individual, properties of sets. Here we tested the spatial nature of ensemble statistics. We used a mean-size adaptation paradigm (Corbett et al. in Visual Cognition, 20, 211–231, 2012) to examine whether average size is encoded in multiple reference frames. We adapted observers to patches of small- and large-sized dots in opposite regions of the display (left/right or top/bottom) and then tested their perceptions of the sizes of single test dots presented in regions that corresponded to retinotopic, spatiotopic, and hemispheric coordinates within the adapting displays. We observed retinotopic, spatiotopic, and hemispheric adaptation aftereffects, such that participants perceived a test dot as being larger when it was presented in the area adapted to the patch of small dots than when it was presented in the area adapted to large dots. This aftereffect also transferred between eyes. Our results demonstrate that mean size is represented across multiple spatial frames of reference, supporting the proposal that ensemble statistics play a fundamental role in maintaining perceptual stability.

[1]  Ehud Zohary,et al.  Motion adaptation reveals that the motion vector is represented in multiple coordinate frames. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[2]  H Choo,et al.  Objects with reduced visibility still contribute to size averaging , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Chris Oriet,et al.  Size averaging of irrelevant stimuli cannot be prevented , 2013, Vision Research.

[4]  D. Ariely.  Seeing Sets: Representation by Statistical Properties , 2001, Psychological science.

[5]  TorralbaAntonio,et al.  Modeling the Shape of the Scene , 2001 .

[6]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Visual stability based on remapping of attention pointers , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  TO SEE OR NOT TO SEE: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes , 1997 .

[8]  Christopher B. Currie,et al.  Visual stability across saccades while viewing complex pictures. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Jennifer E. Corbett,et al.  The whole is indeed more than the sum of its parts: perceptual averaging in the absence of individual item representation. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[10]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Adaptation of retinal processing to image contrast and spatial scale , 1997, Nature.

[11]  David E. Irwin,et al.  The role of the saccade target object in the perception of a visually stable world , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Frank H. Durgin,et al.  Texture density aftereffects in the perception of artificial and natural textures , 1997, Vision Research.

[13]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Evidence against visual integration across saccadic eye movements , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural image statistics and neural representation. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[15]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Modeling the Shape of the Scene: A Holistic Representation of the Spatial Envelope , 2001, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[16]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  Shapes, surfaces and saccades , 1999, Vision Research.

[17]  U. Ilg,et al.  Visual Stability and the Motion Aftereffect: A Psychophysical Study Revealing Spatial Updating , 2011, PloS one.

[18]  Ernst Gombrich,et al.  The Sense of Order: A Study in the Psychology of Decorative Art , 1979 .

[19]  J. Douglas Crawford,et al.  Visual memory capacity in transsaccadic integration , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  Arash Afraz,et al.  Topography of the motion aftereffect with and without eye movements. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[21]  R. Saxe,et al.  Look at this: the neural correlates of initiating and responding to bids for joint attention , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[22]  J. Gibson,et al.  ADAPTATION , AFTEREFFECT AND CONTRAST IN THE PERCEPTION OF TILTED LINES , 2004 .

[23]  D. E. Irwin.  Memory for position and identity across eye movements. , 1992 .

[24]  Bruce Bridgeman,et al.  Failure to detect displacement of the visual world during saccadic eye movements , 1975, Vision Research.

[25]  Maria Concetta Morrone,et al.  Spatiotopic neural representations develop slowly across saccades , 2013, Current Biology.

[26]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  The motion aftereffect , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  F. Durgin.  Texture density adaptation and visual number revisited , 2008, Current Biology.

[28]  Hee Yeon Im,et al.  The effects of sampling and internal noise on the representation of ensemble average size , 2012, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[29]  M. Potter,et al.  Recognition memory for a rapid sequence of pictures. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[30]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Change blindness: past, present, and future , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  David Whitney,et al.  An aftereffect of adaptation to mean size , 2012, Visual cognition.

[32]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Automatic statistical processing of visual properties in simultanagnosia , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  The Motion Aftereffect:A Modern Perspective , 1998 .

[34]  M. Nicholls,et al.  Free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for the judgement of brightness, numerosity and size , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  D. Burr,et al.  A Visual Sense of Number , 2007, Current Biology.

[36]  C. Colby,et al.  Trans-saccadic perception , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  Ronald A. Rensink.  The Dynamic Representation of Scenes , 2000 .

[38]  Hisashi Q. Higuchi.  On the nature of , 1999 .

[39]  Robert H Wurtz,et al.  Modulation of shifting receptive field activity in frontal eye field by visual salience. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  Hee Yeon Im,et al.  Computation of mean size is based on perceived size , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[41]  A. Oliva,et al.  The Representation of Simple Ensemble Visual Features Outside the Focus of Attention , 2008, Psychological science.

[42]  S. C. Chong,et al.  Extracting the mean size across the visual field in patients with mild, chronic unilateral neglect , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[43]  G. Kubler.  The Sense of Order: A Study in the Psychology of Decorative Art. E. H. Gombrich , 1980 .

[44]  J. Vercher,et al.  Mechanisms of short-term saccadic adaptation. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  Frank H. Durgin,et al.  Texture density adaptation and the perceived numerosity and distribution of texture. , 1995 .

[46]  J. Lund,et al.  Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[47]  Randolph Blake,et al.  On the nature of the stimulus information necessary for estimating mean size of visual arrays. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[48]  Jason M Haberman,et al.  Correspondences Rapid extraction of mean emotion and gender from sets of faces , 2007 .

[49]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Rapid gain adaptation affects the dynamics of saccadic eye movements in humans , 1995, Vision Research.

[50]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[51]  A. Noë,et al.  A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[52]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  The rapid extraction of numeric meaning , 2006, Vision Research.

[53]  David J. Field,et al.  Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images , 1996, Nature.

[54]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Transsaccadic memory of position and form. , 2002, Progress in brain research.

[55]  M. Lévesque.  Perception , 1986, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[56]  Julie D. Golomb,et al.  The Native Coordinate System of Spatial Attention Is Retinotopic , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[57]  Sung Jun Joo,et al.  Statistical processing: Not so implausible after all , 2008, Perception & Psychophysics.

[58]  R. Wurtz.  Neuronal mechanisms of visual stability , 2008, Vision Research.

[59]  D. Ariely.  Better than average? When can we say that subsampling of items is better than statistical summary representations? , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[60]  H. Hock,et al.  The abstraction of schematic representations from photographs of real-world scenes , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[61]  Bruce Bridgeman,et al.  A theory of visual stability across saccadic eye movements , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[62]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[63]  D. Melcher.  Predictive remapping of visual features precedes saccadic eye movements , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[64]  A. Treisman,et al.  Representation of statistical properties , 2003, Vision Research.

[65]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[66]  D. Simons,et al.  CHAPTER 13 – Change Blindness , 2005 .

[67]  M. Bar.  Visual objects in context , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[68]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[69]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  Saccadic localization of random dot targets , 1998, Vision Research.

[70]  Chris Oriet,et al.  Rapid averaging? Not so fast! , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.