Reviewing the technological challenges associated with the development of a laparoscopic palpation device

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has heralded a revolution in surgical practice, with numerous advantages over open surgery. Nevertheless, it prevents the surgeon from directly touching and manipulating tissue and therefore severely restricts the use of valuable techniques such as palpation. Accordingly a key challenge in MIS is to restore haptic feedback to the surgeon. This paper reviews the state‐of‐the‐art in laparoscopic palpation devices (LPDs) with particular focus on device mechanisms, sensors and data analysis. It concludes by examining the challenges that must be overcome to create effective LPD systems that measure and display haptic information to the surgeon for improved intraoperative assessment. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  C. K. Adams,et al.  Major stimulus dimensions determining detection of simulated breast lesions , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  John M. Cioffi,et al.  ECG Enhancement by Adaptive Cancellation of Electrosurgical Interference , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  P. Dario,et al.  An advanced robot system for automated diagnostic tasks through palpation , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  Robert D. Howe,et al.  Remote palpation technology , 1995 .

[5]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Tactual discrimination of softness. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  M. Jayabalan Sterilization and Reprocessing of Materials and Medical Devices—Reusability , 1995, Journal of biomaterials applications.

[7]  Grigore C. Burdea,et al.  Human performance using virtual reality tumor palpation simulation , 1997, Comput. Graph..

[8]  W. J. Peine Do Humans Sense Finger Deformation or Distributed Pressure to Detect Lumps in Soft Tissue? , 1998, Dynamic Systems and Control.

[9]  B. Hannaford,et al.  Force controlled and teleoperated endoscopic grasper for minimally invasive surgery-experimental performance evaluation , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  S. Fletcher,et al.  The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have breast cancer? The screening clinical breast examination: should it be done? How? , 1999, JAMA.

[11]  W. Sjoerdsma,et al.  Sensitivity of laparoscopic dissectors , 1999, Surgical Endoscopy.

[12]  D. Gouma,et al.  Sensitivity of laparoscopic dissectors. What can you feel? , 1999, Surgical endoscopy.

[13]  R S Haluck,et al.  Defining the role of haptic feedback in minimally invasive surgery. , 1999, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[14]  R. Howe,et al.  Tactile imaging of breast masses: first clinical report. , 2001, Archives of surgery.

[15]  Alfred Cuschieri,et al.  Measurements and modelling of the compliance of human and porcine organs , 2001, Medical Image Anal..

[16]  Gábor Székely,et al.  Inverse Finite Element Characterization of Soft Tissues , 2001, MICCAI.

[17]  Wen-Chun Yeh,et al.  Elastic modulus measurements of human liver and correlation with pathology. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[18]  Jaydev P. Desai,et al.  Real-Time Haptic Feedback in Laparoscopic Tools for Use in Gastro-Intestinal Surgery , 2002, MICCAI.

[19]  Alana Sherman,et al.  Design of bilateral teleoperation controllers for haptic exploration and telemanipulation of soft environments , 2002, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[20]  G. Picod,et al.  What can the operator actually feel when performing a laparoscopy? , 2003, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[21]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  Surgery Simulation and Soft Tissue Modeling , 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[22]  J. Sainsbury,et al.  Bailey and Love's Short Practice of Surgery , 2004 .

[23]  A. Lanfranco,et al.  Robotic Surgery: A Current Perspective , 2004, Annals of surgery.

[24]  J. Dankelman,et al.  The influence of force feedback and visual feedback in grasping tissue laparoscopicaUy , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy.

[25]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Methods for haptic feedback in teleoperated robot-assisted surgery , 2004 .

[26]  Jenny Dankelman,et al.  Slip and damage properties of jaws of laparoscopic graspers , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy.

[27]  M. Moallem,et al.  Methods and mechanisms for contact feedback in a robot-assisted minimally invasive environment , 2006, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[28]  Darius Burschka,et al.  DaVinci Canvas: A Telerobotic Surgical System with Integrated, Robot-Assisted, Laparoscopic Ultrasound Capability , 2005, MICCAI.

[29]  Hendrik Van Brussel,et al.  Reliable and Enhanced Stiffness Perception in Soft-tissue Telemanipulation , 2005, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[30]  D. Yuh,et al.  Effect of sensory substitution on suture-manipulation forces for robotic surgical systems. , 2005, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[31]  Mark W. Spong,et al.  Bilateral teleoperation: An historical survey , 2006, Autom..

[32]  Caroline G. L. Cao,et al.  Effects of Vision and Friction on Haptic Perception , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[33]  David Jayne,et al.  Telerobotics: surgery for the 21st century , 2006 .

[34]  Armen P. Sarvazyan,et al.  Prostate mechanical imaging: 3-D image composition and feature calculations , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[35]  Stephen A. Brewster,et al.  Sensory substitution using tactile pin arrays: Human factors, technology and applications , 2006, Signal Process..

[36]  M. V. Ottermo Virtual Palpation Gripper , 2006 .

[37]  Javad Dargahi,et al.  Detection of tumours using a computational tactile sensing approach , 2006, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[38]  Marc O Schurr,et al.  Artificial tactile sensing in minimally invasive surgery – a new technical approach , 2006, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[39]  Javad Dargahi,et al.  Application of artificial neural networks for the estimation of tumour characteristics in biological tissues , 2007, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[40]  M. Webster,et al.  Ex vivo biomechanical behavior of abdominal aortic aneurysm: Assessment using a new mathematical model , 1996, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[41]  Michael Bajka,et al.  The mechanical response of human liver and its relation to histology: An in vivo study , 2007, Medical Image Anal..

[42]  H. D. Zoysa,et al.  Cleaning, disinfection and sterilization of equipment , 2007 .

[43]  J.P. Desai,et al.  A General-Purpose 7 DOF Haptic Device: Applications Toward Robot-Assisted Surgery , 2007, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[44]  H. Halperin,et al.  Experimental and numerical analyses of indentation in finite-sized isotropic and anisotropic rubber-like materials , 1997, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[45]  M. Schijven,et al.  The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[46]  Christopher Bulstrode,et al.  Bailey & Love's Short Practice of Surgery 25th Edition , 2008 .

[47]  Jaydev P. Desai,et al.  A Compact and Modular Laparoscopic Grasper With Tridirectional Force Measurement Capability , 2008 .

[48]  Armen P. Sarvazyan,et al.  Mechanical Imaging of the Breast , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[49]  J. Dankelman,et al.  Haptics in minimally invasive surgery – a review , 2008, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[50]  D. Yuh,et al.  Effects of visual force feedback on robot-assisted surgical task performance. , 2008, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[51]  L.D. Seneviratne,et al.  State-of-the-Art in Force and Tactile Sensing for Minimally Invasive Surgery , 2008, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[52]  Armen Sarvazyan,et al.  Prostate mechanical imaging: a new method for prostate assessment. , 2008, Urology.

[53]  Øyvind Stavdahl,et al.  Design and Performance of a Prototype Tactile Shape Display for Minimally Invasive Surgery , 2008 .

[54]  A. L. Trejos,et al.  Feasibility of locating tumours in lung via kinaesthetic feedback , 2008, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[55]  Mahdi Tavakoli,et al.  Haptics in Telerobotic Systems for Minimally Invasive Surgery , 2008 .

[56]  A. Okamura Haptic feedback in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery , 2009, Current opinion in urology.

[57]  Marc O Schurr,et al.  Review on aspects of artificial tactile feedback in laparoscopic surgery. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[58]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Tissue property estimation and graphical display for teleoperated robot-assisted surgery , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[59]  T. Johansen,et al.  A remote palpation instrument for laparoscopic surgery: Design and performance , 2009, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[60]  A. Sarvazyan,et al.  Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions by mechanical imaging , 2009, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[61]  Rajnikant V. Patel,et al.  Robot-assisted Tactile Sensing for Minimally Invasive Tumor Localization , 2009, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[62]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  DLR MiroSurge: a versatile system for research in endoscopic telesurgery , 2010, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[63]  Lucian Panait,et al.  The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic simulation training. , 2009, The Journal of surgical research.

[64]  Catherine E. Lewis,et al.  Tactile Feedback Induces Reduced Grasping Force in Robot-Assisted Surgery , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[65]  Kaspar Althoefer,et al.  A novel MRI compatible air-cushion tactile sensor for Minimally Invasive Surgery , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[66]  Armen P. Sarvazyan,et al.  Mechanical imaging in medical applications , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[67]  Gregory J. Gerling,et al.  Quantifying Palpation Techniques in Relation to Performance in a Clinical Prostate Exam , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[68]  Siamak Najarian,et al.  Application of artificial tactile sensing approach in kidney-stone-removal laparoscopy. , 2010, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[69]  G. Buess,et al.  Artificial tactile feedback can significantly improve tissue examination through remote palpation , 2010, Surgical Endoscopy.

[70]  Rajnikant V. Patel,et al.  Haptics-enabled teleoperation for robot-assisted tumor localization , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[71]  Ana Luisa Trejos,et al.  Palpation system for minimally invasive localization of occult tumors , 2010, 2010 3rd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[72]  Jaydev P. Desai,et al.  Development of In Vivo Constitutive Models for Liver: Application to Surgical Simulation , 2011, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[73]  Giulio Sandini,et al.  Tactile Sensing—From Humans to Humanoids , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[74]  J. Dai,et al.  An indentation depth—force sensing wheeled probe for abnormality identification during minimally invasive surgery , 2010, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[75]  Sayyed Mohsen Hosseini,et al.  A medical tactile sensing instrument for detecting embedded objects, with specific application for breast examination , 2009, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[76]  Takeshi Matsumura,et al.  Real-time balloon inflation elastography for prostate cancer detection and initial evaluation of clinicopathologic analysis. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[77]  Tomoyuki Shimono,et al.  Newly developed haptic forceps enables sensitive, real-time measurements of organ elasticity , 2010, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[78]  M. T. Perri,et al.  New tactile sensing system for minimally invasive surgical tumour localization , 2010, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[79]  Charles R Doarn,et al.  The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic training using the LapMentor II. , 2010, Journal of endourology.

[80]  Kaspar Althoefer,et al.  Rolling Mechanical Imaging for Tissue Abnormality Localization During Minimally Invasive Surgery , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[81]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Human vs. robotic tactile sensing: Detecting lumps in soft tissue , 2010, 2010 IEEE Haptics Symposium.

[82]  S. Najarian,et al.  Design and fabrication of a novel tactile sensory system applicable in artificial palpation , 2011, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[83]  J. Rogers,et al.  Materials for multifunctional balloon catheters with capabilities in cardiac electrophysiological mapping and ablation therapy. , 2011, Nature materials.

[84]  B. Hannaford,et al.  Surgical robotics : systems, applications and visions , 2011 .

[85]  Afsaneh Mojra,et al.  A novel haptic robotic viscogram for characterizing the viscoelastic behaviour of breast tissue in clinical examinations , 2011, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[86]  S Najarian,et al.  Advances in medical robotic systems with specific applications in surgery—a review , 2011, Journal of medical engineering & technology.