An intentional stance modulates the integration of gesture and speech during comprehension

The present study investigates whether knowledge about the intentional relationship between gesture and speech influences controlled processes when integrating the two modalities at comprehension. Thirty-five adults watched short videos of gesture and speech that conveyed semantically congruous and incongruous information. In half of the videos, participants were told that the two modalities were intentionally coupled (i.e., produced by the same communicator), and in the other half, they were told that the two modalities were not intentionally coupled (i.e., produced by different communicators). When participants knew that the same communicator produced the speech and gesture, there was a larger bi-lateral frontal and central N400 effect to words that were semantically incongruous versus congruous with gesture. However, when participants knew that different communicators produced the speech and gesture--that is, when gesture and speech were not intentionally meant to go together--the N400 effect was present only in right-hemisphere frontal regions. The results demonstrate that pragmatic knowledge about the intentional relationship between gesture and speech modulates controlled neural processes during the integration of the two modalities.

[1]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  Janet Beavin Bavelas,et al.  An experimental study of when and how speakers use gestures to communicate , 2002 .

[3]  Phillip J Holcomb,et al.  Semantic integration in videos of real-world events: an electrophysiological investigation. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[4]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Fourteen-through 18-month-old infants di eren-tially imitate intentional and accidental actions , 1998 .

[5]  T. Allison,et al.  Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  Christine Chiarello,et al.  Right Hemisphere Contributions to Lexical Semantics , 1988 .

[7]  M. Heil,et al.  Automatic Semantic Activation Is No Myth , 2004, Psychological science.

[8]  C. Chiarello Semantic Priming in the Intact Brain: Separate Roles for the Right and Left Hemispheres? , 1988 .

[9]  Sotaro Kita,et al.  On-line Integration of Semantic Information from Speech and Gesture: Insights from Event-related Brain Potentials , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[11]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and cognitive control. , 1975 .

[12]  A. Kendon Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance , 2004 .

[13]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Specific Involvement of Human Parietal Systems and the Amygdala in the Perception of Biological Motion , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain Areas Involved in Perception of Biological Motion , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Right words and left words: electrophysiological evidence for hemispheric differences in meaning processing. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[16]  P. Holcomb Automatic and attentional processing: An event-related brain potential analysis of semantic priming , 1988, Brain and Language.

[17]  S. Kelly,et al.  Neural correlates of bimodal speech and gesture comprehension , 2004, Brain and Language.

[18]  P. Baudonniere,et al.  Evidence of a visual-to-auditory cross-modal sensory gating phenomenon as reflected by the human P50 event-related brain potential modulation , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[19]  Klucharev Vasily,et al.  Electrophysiological indicators of phonetic and non-phonetic multisensory interactions during audiovisual speech perception. , 2003 .

[20]  R. Kirk Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[21]  Seana Coulson,et al.  Right Hemisphere Activation of Joke-related Information: An Event-related Brain Potential Study , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Cooperation of different neuronal systems during hand sign recognition , 2004, NeuroImage.

[23]  M. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and the semantic matching of pictures , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[24]  W. Prinz,et al.  The Perceived Onset Time of Self- and Other-Generated Actions , 2003, Psychological science.

[25]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  A unifying view of the basis of social cognition , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  Seana Coulson,et al.  Electrophysiology and Pragmatic Language Comprehension , 2004 .

[27]  L. Aravind,et al.  Integration of Word Meaning and World Knowledge in Language Comprehension , 2022 .

[28]  R. Passingham,et al.  Brain Mechanisms for Inferring Deceit in the Actions of Others , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  N. Reissland From Hand to Mouth: The Origins of Language , 2006 .

[30]  Dare A. Baldwin,et al.  Early referential understanding: Infants' ability to recognize referential acts for what they are. , 1993 .

[31]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related potentials during discourse-level semantic integration of complex pictures. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[32]  Susan Goldin Hearing gesture : how our hands help us think , 2003 .

[33]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  The Processing Nature of the N400: Evidence from Masked Priming , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  Right Hemisphere Activation during Indirect Semantic Priming: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials , 1998, Brain and Language.

[35]  Kevin A. Pelphrey,et al.  Grasping the Intentions of Others: The Perceived Intentionality of an Action Influences Activity in the Superior Temporal Sulcus during Social Perception , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  M. Moulson,et al.  Neural Correlates of Mental State Decoding in Human Adults: An Event-related Potential Study , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  David Poeppel,et al.  Visual speech speeds up the neural processing of auditory speech. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  B. Rossion,et al.  The time‐course of intermodal binding between seeing and hearing affective information , 2000, Neuroreport.

[39]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Grasping the Intentions of Others with One's Own Mirror Neuron System , 2005, PLoS biology.

[40]  E. Bates Language and context: The acquisition of pragmatics , 1976 .

[41]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Offering a Hand to Pragmatic Understanding: The Role of Speech and Gesture in Comprehension and Memory , 1999 .

[42]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[43]  P. Holcomb Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: implications for the role of the N400 in language processing. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[44]  Alan S. Brown,et al.  Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium , 1976 .

[45]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Lexical-semantic event-related potential effects in patients with left hemisphere lesions and aphasia, and patients with right hemisphere lesions without aphasia. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[46]  M. Arbib,et al.  Neural expectations : A possible evolutionary path from manual skills to language , 1996 .

[47]  R. B. Church,et al.  A comparison between children's and adults' ability to detect conceptual information conveyed through representational gestures. , 1998, Child development.

[48]  M. Balconi,et al.  N400 and P600 or the Role of the ERP Correlates in Sentence Comprehension: Some Applications to the Italian Language , 2004, The Journal of general psychology.

[49]  Ying Choon Wu,et al.  Meaningful gestures: electrophysiological indices of iconic gesture comprehension. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[50]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Gesture and the communicative intention of the speaker , 2005 .

[51]  J. Grafman,et al.  Summation Priming and Coarse Semantic Coding in the Right Hemisphere , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[52]  GEOFFREY BEATTIE,et al.  Do iconic hand gestures really contribute anything to the semantic information conveyed by speech? An experimental investigation , 1999 .

[53]  M. Kutas,et al.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.

[54]  Leslie Goldsmith,et al.  Putting Language Back in the Body: Speech and Gesture on Three Time Frames , 2002, Developmental neuropsychology.

[55]  K. Amunts,et al.  Broca's region: from action to language. , 2005, Physiology.

[56]  S. Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Assessing Knowledge Through Gesture: Using Children's Hands to Read Their Minds , 1992 .

[57]  Marilyn K. Strube,et al.  Automatic vs. controlled processes in semantic priming--differentiation by event-related potentials. , 2002, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[58]  D. McNeill,et al.  Speech-gesture mismatches: Evidence for one underlying representation of linguistic and nonlinguistic information , 1998 .

[59]  Dare A. Baldwin,et al.  Infants' ability to consult the speaker for clues to word reference , 1993, Journal of Child Language.

[60]  P. Michie,et al.  Modulation of Event-Related Potentials by Semantic Priming: Effects of Color-Cued Selective Attention , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[61]  B. Gelder Towards the neurobiology of emotional body language , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[62]  Aina Puce,et al.  Electrophysiology and brain imaging of biological motion. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[63]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The N400 as a function of the level of processing. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[64]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[65]  A. Meltzoff Understanding the Intentions of Others: Re-Enactment of Intended Acts by 18-Month-Old Children. , 1995, Developmental psychology.

[66]  R. Abelson Statistics As Principled Argument , 1995 .

[67]  D. Dennett The Intentional Stance. , 1987 .

[68]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[69]  J. Decety,et al.  From the perception of action to the understanding of intention , 2001, Nature reviews. Neuroscience.

[70]  J. Lupiáñez,et al.  High density ERP indices of conscious and unconscious semantic priming. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[71]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of trustworthiness of faces , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[72]  Agnes Flöel,et al.  Language perception activates the hand motor cortex: implications for motor theories of speech perception , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[73]  D. McNeill Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought , 1992 .