Cooperative target localization by multiple unmanned aircraft systems using sensor fusion quality

Over the past several years, researchers at the U.S. Air Force Academy developed cooperative, distributed aerial sensor networks (Pack et al. in IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B Cybern 39(4):959–970, 2009) using multiple small unmanned aerial vehicles (SUAVs) to search, detect, and locate ground targets. The use of distributed SUAVs, however, introduced a set of problems, including difficulties in reliable air-to-air communication and clock synchronization among onboard systems of multiple SUAVs. The communication problems further aggravate the synchronization problem contributing to a large target localization error. Conventional methods use multiple sensor outputs of the same target seen from different perspectives to increase the target localization accuracy. These methods are effective only when the pose errors of sensor platforms based on GPS data are modeled accurately, which is not a reasonable assumption for SUAVs, especially when SUAVs operate in an environment with wind gusts. In this paper, we propose a robust, novel technique that analyzes what we call ‘sensor fusion quality’ to assign an appropriate sensor reliability value to each set of updated sensor data. In the proposed approach, we characterize the quality of a set of newly acquired sensor data, containing a target, by examining the joint target location probability density function. The validity of the proposed method is demonstrated using flight test data.

[1]  Daniel Pack,et al.  An Event-Driven Software Architecture for Multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicles to Cooperatively Locate Mobile Targets , 2009 .

[2]  Daniel Pack,et al.  Out-of-Order Sigma-Point Kalman Filtering for Target Localization Using Cooperating Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2007 .

[3]  Hugh F. Durrant-Whyte,et al.  Coordinated decentralized search for a lost target in a Bayesian world , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).

[4]  Mubarak Shah,et al.  Target tracking in airborne forward looking infrared imagery , 2003, Image Vis. Comput..

[5]  G. Sukhatme,et al.  Autonomous Flying Vehicle Research at the University of Southern California , 2002 .

[6]  Daniel Pack,et al.  Autonomous Target Detection and Localization Using Cooperative Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2009 .

[7]  Izhak Rubin,et al.  A framework and analysis for cooperative search using UAV swarms , 2004, SAC '04.

[8]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  UAV ROUTING IN A STOCHASTIC, TIME-VARYING ENVIRONMENT , 2005, IFAC Proceedings Volumes.

[9]  S. Shankar Sastry,et al.  Probabilistic pursuit-evasion games: theory, implementation, and experimental evaluation , 2002, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[10]  Panos M. Pardalos,et al.  Advances in Cooperative Control and Optimization , 2008 .

[11]  George York,et al.  Cooperative Control of UAVs for Localization of Intermittently Emitting Mobile Targets , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[12]  Gérard G. Medioni,et al.  Detecting and tracking moving objects for video surveillance , 1999, Proceedings. 1999 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Cat. No PR00149).

[13]  Panos M. Pardalos,et al.  Robust multi-sensor scheduling for multi-site surveillance , 2011, J. Comb. Optim..

[14]  Maciej Patan,et al.  D-optimal design of a monitoring network for parameter estimation of distributed systems , 2007, J. Glob. Optim..