Precision in Visual Working Memory Reaches a Stable Plateau When Individual Item Limits Are Exceeded

Multiple studies have demonstrated that resolution in working memory (WM) declines as the number of stored items increases. Discrete-resource models predict that this decline should reach a stable plateau at relatively small set sizes because item limits prevent additional information from being encoded into WM at larger set sizes. By contrast, flexible-resource models predict that the monotonic declines in precision will continue indefinitely as set size increases and resources are distributed without any fixed item limit. In the present work, we found that WM resolution exhibited monotonic declines until set size reached three items, after which resolution achieved a clear asymptote. Moreover, analyses of individual differences showed a strong correlation between each observer's item limit and the set size at which WM resolution achieved asymptote. These behavioral observations were corroborated by measurements of contralateral delay activity (CDA), an event-related potential waveform that tracks the number of items maintained during the delay period. CDA activity rose monotonically and achieved asymptote at a set size that predicted individual WM capacity. Moreover, this neural measure of on-line storage also predicted the set size at which mnemonic resolution reached a stable plateau for each observer. Thus, independent behavioral and neural measures of WM capacity support a clear prediction of discrete-resource models. Precision in visual WM reaches asymptote when individual item limits are exceeded.

[1]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding reveals the contents of visual working memory in early visual areas , 2009, Nature.

[2]  E. Vogel,et al.  Neural Measures of Individual Differences in Selecting and Tracking Multiple Moving Objects , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  B. Postle Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain , 2006, Neuroscience.

[4]  S. Luck,et al.  Bridging the Gap between Monkey Neurophysiology and Human Perception: An Ambiguity Resolution Theory of Visual Selective Attention , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  Paul M Bays,et al.  The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[6]  Paul M Bays,et al.  Dynamic Shifts of Limited Working Memory Resources in Human Vision , 2008, Science.

[7]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity , 2004, Nature.

[8]  E. Vogel,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence for a Postperceptual Locus of Suppression during the Attentional Blink Time-based Attention and the Attentional Blink , 1998 .

[9]  P Bays,et al.  Precision versus capacity of working memory in schizophrenic and healthy individuals , 2010 .

[10]  Edward F. Ester,et al.  Discrete resource allocation in visual working memory. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  R. Cusack,et al.  Encoding strategy and not visual working memory capacity correlates with intelligence , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  E. Vogel,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Visual Working Memory Represents a Fixed Number of Items Regardless of Complexity , 2022 .

[13]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Electrophysiological Measures of Maintaining Representations in Visual Working Memory , 2007, Cortex.

[14]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[15]  W. Ma,et al.  A detection theory account of change detection. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[16]  Edward F. Ester,et al.  Spatially Global Representations in Human Primary Visual Cortex during Working Memory Maintenance , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[18]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory , 2005, Nature.

[19]  J. Jay Todd,et al.  Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex , 2004, Nature.

[20]  Edward F. Ester,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Stimulus-Specific Delay Activity in Human Primary Visual Cortex , 2022 .

[21]  Jeffrey N Rouder,et al.  An assessment of fixed-capacity models of visual working memory , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  S. Luck,et al.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory , 2008, Nature.

[23]  M. Chun,et al.  Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects , 2006, Nature.

[24]  A. Raffone,et al.  A Cortical Mechanism for Binding in Visual Working Memory , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  Valerie M. Beck,et al.  Reduced capacity but spared precision and maintenance of working memory representations in schizophrenia. , 2010, Archives of general psychiatry.

[26]  E. Vogel,et al.  CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE How to Exploit Diversity for Scientific Gain Using Individual Differences to Constrain Cognitive Theory , 2022 .

[27]  J E Lisman,et al.  Storage of 7 +/- 2 short-term memories in oscillatory subcycles , 1995, Science.

[28]  R. Marois,et al.  Posterior parietal cortex activity predicts individual differences in visual short-term memory capacity , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[29]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[30]  John Jonides,et al.  Processes of Working Memory in Mind and Brain , 2005 .

[31]  Edward Awh,et al.  A bilateral advantage for storage in visual working memory , 2010, Cognition.

[32]  J. Jonides,et al.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.