Spatial structure and symmetry of simple-cell receptive fields in macaque primary visual cortex.

I present measurements of the spatial structure of simple-cell receptive fields in macaque primary visual cortex (area V1). Similar to previous findings in cat area 17, the spatial profile of simple-cell receptive fields in the macaque is well described by two-dimensional Gabor functions. A population analysis reveals that the distribution of spatial profiles in primary visual cortex lies approximately on a one-parameter family of filter shapes. Surprisingly, the receptive fields cluster into even- and odd-symmetry classes with a tendency for neurons that are well tuned in orientation and spatial frequency to have odd-symmetric receptive fields. The filter shapes predicted by two recent theories of simple-cell receptive field function, independent component analysis and sparse coding, are compared with the data. Both theories predict receptive fields with a larger number of subfields than observed in the experimental data. In addition, these theories do not generate receptive fields that are broadly tuned in orientation and low-pass in spatial frequency, which are commonly seen in monkey V1. The implications of these results for our understanding of image coding and representation in primary visual cortex are discussed.

[1]  J. Movshon,et al.  Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  E. Yund,et al.  Responses of striate cortex cells to grating and checkerboard patterns. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  S Marcelja,et al.  Mathematical description of the responses of simple cortical cells. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[4]  J. Hartigan,et al.  The Dip Test of Unimodality , 1985 .

[5]  D. Field,et al.  The structure and symmetry of simple-cell receptive-field profiles in the cat’s visual cortex , 1986, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[6]  J. P. Jones,et al.  An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  J. P. Jones,et al.  The two-dimensional spatial structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  A. Parker,et al.  Spatial properties of neurons in the monkey striate cortex , 1987, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[9]  R. Shapley,et al.  Linear mechanisms of directional selectivity in simple cells of cat striate cortex. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  A. Parker,et al.  Two-dimensional spatial structure of receptive fields in monkey striate cortex. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[11]  W. Cleveland,et al.  Locally Weighted Regression: An Approach to Regression Analysis by Local Fitting , 1988 .

[12]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Visual cortical receptive fields in monkey and cat: Spatial and temporal phase transfer function , 1989, Vision Research.

[13]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. II. Linearity of temporal and spatial summation. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. I. General characteristics and postnatal development. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  D. Ruderman.  The statistics of natural images , 1994 .

[16]  Patrick C. Teo,et al.  A model of perceptual image fidelity , 1995, Proceedings., International Conference on Image Processing.

[17]  David J. Field,et al.  Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images , 1996, Nature.

[18]  David J. Field,et al.  Sparse coding with an overcomplete basis set: A strategy employed by V1? , 1997, Vision Research.

[19]  J. Movshon,et al.  Linearity and Normalization in Simple Cells of the Macaque Primary Visual Cortex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Dario L. Ringach,et al.  Dynamics of orientation tuning in macaque primary visual cortex , 1997, Nature.

[21]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  The “independent components” of natural scenes are edge filters , 1997, Vision Research.

[22]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  A subspace reverse-correlation technique for the study of visual neurons , 1997, Vision Research.

[23]  J. V. van Hateren,et al.  Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  D. Ruderman,et al.  INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS OF NATURAL IMAGE SEQUENCES YIELDS SPATIOTEMPORAL FILTERS SIMILAR TO SIMPLE CELLS IN PRIMARY VISUAL CORTEX , 1998 .

[25]  D. Ruderman,et al.  Independent component analysis of natural image sequences yields spatio-temporal filters similar to simple cells in primary visual cortex , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Functional Micro-Organization of Primary Visual Cortex: Receptive Field Analysis of Nearby Neurons , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  R. L. Valois,et al.  Spatial and temporal receptive fields of geniculate and cortical cells and directional selectivity , 2000, Vision Research.

[28]  B Willmore,et al.  A Comparison of Natural-Image-Based Models of Simple-Cell Coding , 2000, Perception.

[29]  Bruno A. Olshausen,et al.  Sparse Codes and Spikes , 2001 .

[30]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural image statistics and neural representation. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[31]  BsnNr C. Srorn,et al.  CLASSIFYING SIMPLE AND COMPLEX CELLS ON THE BASIS OF RESPONSE MODULATION , 2002 .

[32]  RussLL L. Ds Vnlos,et al.  SPATIAL FREQUENCY SELECTIVITY OF CELLS IN MACAQUE VISUAL CORTEX , 2022 .