Impact of Cognitive Abilities and Prior Knowledge on Complex Problem Solving Performance – Empirical Results and a Plea for Ecologically Valid Microworlds

The original aim of complex problem solving (CPS) research was to bring the cognitive demands of complex real-life problems into the lab in order to investigate problem solving behavior and performance under controlled conditions. Up until now, the validity of psychometric intelligence constructs has been scrutinized with regard to its importance for CPS performance. At the same time, different CPS measurement approaches competing for the title of the best way to assess CPS have been developed. In the first part of the paper, we investigate the predictability of CPS performance on the basis of the Berlin Intelligence Structure Model and Cattell’s investment theory as well as an elaborated knowledge taxonomy. In the first study, 137 students managed a simulated shirt factory (Tailorshop; i.e., a complex real life-oriented system) twice, while in the second study, 152 students completed a forestry scenario (FSYS; i.e., a complex artificial world system). The results indicate that reasoning – specifically numerical reasoning (Studies 1 and 2) and figural reasoning (Study 2) – are the only relevant predictors among the intelligence constructs. We discuss the results with reference to the Brunswik symmetry principle. Path models suggest that reasoning and prior knowledge influence problem solving performance in the Tailorshop scenario mainly indirectly. In addition, different types of system-specific knowledge independently contribute to predicting CPS performance. The results of Study 2 indicate that working memory capacity, assessed as an additional predictor, has no incremental validity beyond reasoning. We conclude that (1) cognitive abilities and prior knowledge are substantial predictors of CPS performance, and (2) in contrast to former and recent interpretations, there is insufficient evidence to consider CPS a unique ability construct. In the second part of the paper, we discuss our results in light of recent CPS research, which predominantly utilizes the minimally complex systems (MCS) measurement approach. We suggest ecologically valid microworlds as an indispensable tool for future CPS research and applications.

[1]  Samuel Greiff,et al.  Assessment of Complex Problem Solving: What We Know and What We Don’t Know , 2016 .

[2]  J. Elashoff,et al.  Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. , 1975 .

[3]  Heinz-Martin Süß,et al.  Intelligenz und komplexes Problemlösen , 1999 .

[4]  Joachim Funke,et al.  Negative affective environments improve complex solving performance , 2010 .

[5]  K. McGrew CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research , 2009 .

[6]  Wm. R. Wright General Intelligence, Objectively Determined and Measured. , 1905 .

[7]  John B. Carroll,et al.  The Three-Stratum Theory of Cognitive Abilities. , 1997 .

[8]  L. Stankov Overemphasized “g” , 2017, Journal of Intelligence.

[9]  Samuel Greiff,et al.  Validity of the MicroDYN approach: Complex problem solving predicts school grades beyond working memory capacity , 2013 .

[10]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  Andreas Kretzschmar Konstruktvalidität des Komplexen Problemlösens unter besonderer Berücksichtigung moderner diagnostischer Ansätze , 2015 .

[12]  M. Just,et al.  Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory , 1991 .

[13]  S. Kay On the Nature of Expertise. , 1992 .

[14]  John Schmid,et al.  The development of hierarchical factor solutions , 1957 .

[15]  J. Horn,et al.  Foundations for Better Understanding of Cognitive Abilities. , 2005 .

[16]  Matthias Stadler,et al.  The complex route to success: complex problem-solving skills in the prediction of university success , 2016 .

[17]  Daniel V. Holt,et al.  Measuring Performance in Dynamic Decision Making Reliability and Validity of the Tailorshop Simulation , 2011 .

[18]  Philipp Sonnleitner,et al.  The Genetics Lab - A new computer-based problem solving scenario to assess intelligence , 2011 .

[19]  G. Ryle,et al.  The concept of mind. , 2004, The International journal of psycho-analysis.

[20]  K. Ryan The Relationship between Complex Problem Solving and Intelligence: An Analysis of Three Computer Simulated Scenarios , 2006 .

[21]  Frank H. Maier,et al.  What are we talking about?—A taxonomy of computer simulations to support learning , 2000 .

[22]  Joachim Funke,et al.  Computer-based testing and training with scenarios from complex problem-solving research , 1998 .

[23]  A. Beauducel,et al.  Faceted Models of Intelligence. , 2005 .

[24]  Samuel Greiff,et al.  Computer-based assessment of Complex Problem Solving: concept, implementation, and application , 2013 .

[25]  Cleotilde Gonzalez,et al.  Instance-based learning in dynamic decision making , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[26]  P. Frensch,et al.  Complex problem solving : the European perspective , 1995 .

[27]  Dietrich Dörner,et al.  The Logic Of Failure: Recognizing And Avoiding Error In Complex Situations , 1997 .

[28]  Samuel Greiff,et al.  The Computer-Based Assessment of Complex Problem Solving and How It Is Influenced by Students' Information and Communication Technology Literacy. , 2014 .

[29]  Andreas Fischer,et al.  Complex problem solving—single ability or complex phenomenon? , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[30]  U. Kipman Komplexes Problemlösen , 2020 .

[31]  B. Csapó,et al.  Potential for Assessing Dynamic Problem-Solving at the Beginning of Higher Education Studies , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[32]  S. Haynes,et al.  Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. , 1995 .

[33]  Detlev Leutner,et al.  The fuzzy relationship of intelligence and problem solving in computer simulations , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[34]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Heuristic decision making. , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[35]  W. Shadish,et al.  Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference , 2001 .

[36]  D. Broadbent,et al.  Interactive tasks and the implicit‐explicit distinction , 1988 .

[37]  L. Swanson,et al.  Working memory, short-term memory, and naming speed as predictors of children's mathematical performance , 2007 .

[38]  Philipp Sonnleitner,et al.  Students' complex problem-solving abilities: Their structure and relations to reasoning ability and educational success , 2013 .

[39]  B. Brehmer In one word: Not from experience. , 1980 .

[40]  Samuel Greiff,et al.  Sometimes less is more: Comparing the validity of complex problem solving measures ☆ , 2015 .

[41]  Annette Kluge,et al.  What you train is what you get Task requirements and training methods in complex problem-solving , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[42]  Martin Kersting,et al.  Kontentvalide Wissensdiagnostik und Problemlösen: Zur Entwicklung, testtheoretischen Begründung und empirischen Bewährung eines problemspezifischen Diagnoseverfahrens , 1995 .

[43]  Werner W. Wittmann,et al.  Multivariate Reliability Theory , 1988 .

[44]  Patrick C. Kyllonen,et al.  Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?! , 1990 .

[45]  Bruce D. Burns,et al.  The Impact of Goal Specificity on Strategy Use and the Acquisition of Problem Structure , 1996, Cogn. Sci..

[46]  Jonas Neubert,et al.  Komplexes Problemlösen, schulfachliche Kompetenzen und ihre Relation zu Schulnoten , 2014 .

[47]  J. M. ten Have The development of the NLR ATC Research Simulator (Narsim): Design philosophy and potential for ATM research , 1993, Simul. Pract. Theory.

[48]  Andreas Größler,et al.  Enhancing Learning Capabilities by Providing Transparency in Business Simulators , 2000 .

[49]  A. Jensen,et al.  What is a good g , 1994 .

[50]  J. Funke Microworlds based on linear equation systems: A new approach to complex problem solving and experimental results , 1993 .

[51]  Phillip L. Ackerman,et al.  INTEGRATING LABORATORY AND FIELD STUDY FOR IMPROVING SELECTION: DEVELOPMENT OF A BATTERY FOR PREDICTING AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLER SUCCESS , 1993 .

[52]  Dawn P. Flanagan,et al.  The Cattell‐Horn‐Carroll Theory of Cognitive Abilities , 2014 .

[53]  Heinz-Martin Süß Intelligenz, Wissen und Problemlösen : Kognitive Voraussetzungen für erfolgreiches Handeln bei computersimulierten Problemen , 1996 .

[54]  J. Gustafsson,et al.  General and Specific Abilities as Predictors of School Achievement. , 1993, Multivariate behavioral research.

[55]  Peter Milling,et al.  Modeling innovation processes for decision support and management simulation , 1996 .

[56]  Natassia Goode,et al.  With a little help …: On the role of guidance in the acquisition and utilisation of knowledge in the control of complex, dynamic systems , 2016 .

[57]  B. E. Partridge,et al.  The Nature of Managerial Work , 1974 .

[58]  J. Horn Spearman, g, Expertise, and the Nature of Human Cognitive Capability , 2007 .

[59]  P. Frensch,et al.  Definitions, traditions, and a general framework for understanding complex problem solving , 1995 .

[60]  D. Broadbent,et al.  Implicit and explicit knowledge in the control of complex systems , 1986 .

[61]  With a little help from... , 1990, The American journal of nursing.

[62]  Joachim Funke,et al.  Finite-State Automata: Dynamic Task Environments in Problem-Solving Research , 1993 .

[63]  William B. Rouse,et al.  The effects of type of knowledge upon human problem solving in a process control task , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[64]  Samuel Greiff,et al.  Construct validity of complex problem solving: A comprehensive view on different facets of intelligence and school grades , 2016 .

[65]  P. Ackerman Predicting individual differences in complex skill acquisition: dynamics of ability determinants. , 1992, The Journal of applied psychology.

[66]  Samuel Greiff,et al.  Extending the assessment of complex problem solving to finite state automata: Embracing heterogeneity. , 2015 .

[67]  Samuel Greiff,et al.  Complex Problem Solving in Educational Contexts—Something Beyond g: Concept, Assessment, Measurement Invariance, and Construct Validity , 2013 .

[68]  D. Wagener,et al.  Personalarbeit mit dem komplexen Szenario FSYS : Validität und Potential von Verhaltensskalen , 2002 .

[69]  W. Wittmann,et al.  Investigating the paths between working memory, intelligence, knowledge, and complex problem solving performances via Brunswik-symmetry , 1999 .

[70]  Sharlene D. Newman,et al.  Complex Problem Solving , 2015 .

[71]  F. Q. Ribeiro The meta-analysis , 2017, Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology.

[72]  M. Bühner,et al.  The Impact of Symmetry: Explaining Contradictory Results Concerning Working Memory, Reasoning, and Complex Problem Solving , 2017, Journal of Intelligence.

[73]  Natassia Goode,et al.  The benefit of being naïve and knowing it: the unfavourable impact of perceived context familiarity on learning in complex problem solving tasks , 2014 .

[74]  Berndt Brehmer,et al.  Reliability and validity of performance measures in microworlds , 2002 .

[75]  A. Beauducel,et al.  Modeling the construct validity of the Berlin Intelligence Structure Model , 2015 .

[76]  Jan L. Plass,et al.  Intelligence Assessment with Computer Simulations. , 2005 .

[77]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  A day at the races: A study of IQ, expertise, and cognitive complexity. , 1986 .

[78]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  The multiple faces of working memory: Storage, processing, supervision, and coordination , 2003 .

[79]  Joachim Funke,et al.  Einige Bemerkungen zu Problemen der Problemlöseforschung oder: Ist Testintelligenz doch ein Prädiktor? , 1983 .

[80]  Cleotilde Gonzalez,et al.  Accounting for outcome and process measures in dynamic decision-making tasks through model calibration , 2015 .

[81]  J. Ashe,et al.  Intelligence in action , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[82]  C. Spearman General intelligence Objectively Determined and Measured , 1904 .

[83]  Joachim Funke,et al.  Steuerung dynamischer Systeme durch Aufbau und Anwendung subjektiver Kausalmodelle , 1985 .

[84]  H. Süss,et al.  A study on the training of complex problem solving competence , 2015 .

[85]  D. Dörner,et al.  Complex Problem Solving: What It Is and What It Is Not , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[86]  Eamonn J. Keogh Instance-Based Learning , 2010, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining.

[87]  Samuel Greiff,et al.  The Genetics Lab: Acceptance and psychometric characteristics of a computer-based microworld assessing complex problem solving , 2012 .

[88]  Annette Kluge,et al.  Performance Assessments With Microworlds and Their Difficulty , 2008 .

[89]  Jan Kraemer,et al.  Real Time Validation of Online Situation Awareness Questionnaires in Simulated Approach Air Traffic Control , 2015 .

[90]  Joseph Wolfe,et al.  The External Validity of a Business Management Game , 1983 .

[91]  Werner W. Wittmann,et al.  The relationship between performance in dynamic systems and intelligence , 2004 .

[92]  Samuel Greiff,et al.  Intelligence in action. Effective strategic behaviors while solving complex problems. , 2017 .

[93]  Werner W. Wittmann,et al.  Multivariate Reliability Theory Principles of Symmetry and Successful Validation Strategies , 2022 .

[94]  J. Kotter,et al.  What effective general managers really do. , 1982, Harvard business review.

[95]  Heinz-Martin Süß,et al.  Intellektuelle Fähigkeiten und die Steuerung komplexer Systeme , 1993 .

[96]  G Kishi,et al.  Reliability and Validity , 1999 .

[97]  Markus Bühner,et al.  Working memory, visual–spatial-intelligence and their relationship to problem-solving , 2008 .

[98]  Samuel Greiff,et al.  Funke Dynamic Problem Solving : A New Assessment Perspective , 2012 .

[99]  Dietrich Dörner,et al.  Problemlösefähigkeit und Intelligenz. , 1983 .

[100]  Samuel Greiff,et al.  Assessing complex problem-solving skills with multiple complex systems , 2015 .

[101]  Natassia Goode,et al.  You need to know: There is a causal relationship between structural knowledge and control performance in complex problem solving tasks , 2010 .

[102]  Alice N. Outerbridge,et al.  Impact of job experience and ability on job knowledge, work sample performance, and supervisory ratings of job performance , 1986 .

[103]  Ronny Scherer,et al.  Is it time for a new measurement approach? A closer look at the assessment of cognitive adaptability in complex problem solving , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[104]  Matthias Stadler,et al.  Complex problem solving and intelligence. A meta-analysis , 2015 .

[105]  Martin Kersting Zur Konstrukt- und Kriteriumsvalidität von Problemlöseszenarien anhand der Vorhersage von Vorgesetztenurteilen über die berufliche Bewährung , 2001 .

[106]  Joachim Funke Analysis of minimal complex systems and complex problem solving require different forms of causal cognition , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[107]  Dietrich Wagener Psychologische Diagnostik mit komplexen Szenarios: Taxonomie, Entwicklung, Evaluation , 2001 .

[108]  Ralf Schulze,et al.  Working-memory capacity explains reasoning abilityand a little bit more , 2002 .

[109]  Andreas Fischer,et al.  Der Nutzen einer komplexen Problemlösekompetenz: Theoretische Überlegungen und empirische Befunde , 2013 .

[110]  G. Trommsdorff,et al.  Dörner, Dietrich ... (Hrsg.): Lohhausen : vom Umgang mit Unbestimmtheit und Komplexität , 1985 .

[111]  Samuel Greiff,et al.  Complex problem solving : More than reasoning ? , 2017 .

[112]  Michael C. Pyryt Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies , 1998 .

[113]  Frank L. Schmidt,et al.  What do data really mean? Research findings, meta-analysis, and cumulative knowledge in psychology. , 1992 .

[114]  Sebastian Sager,et al.  A web-based feedback study on optimization-based training and analysis of human decision making , 2017 .

[115]  Cleotilde Gonzalez,et al.  A generic dynamic control task for behavioral research and education , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[116]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Which Working Memory Functions Predict Intelligence , 2008 .

[117]  Samuel Greiff,et al.  Complex problem solving in educational contexts. Still something beyond a “good g”? , 2016 .

[118]  Ronny Scherer,et al.  Measuring students' progressions in scientific problem solving: A psychometric approach , 2014 .

[119]  M. Mariton,et al.  Control of complex systems , 1991 .

[120]  D. Dörner Diagnostik der operativen Intelligenz. , 1986 .

[121]  J. Funke Wissen über dynamische Systeme. Erwerb, Repräsentation und Anwendung , 1992 .

[122]  André Kretzschmar,et al.  Re-Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of MicroFIN: A Multidimensional Measurement of Complex Problem Solving or a Unidimensional Reasoning Test? , 2017 .

[123]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Attitudes toward objects as predictors of sin-gle and multiple behavioral criteria , 1974 .

[124]  K. Oberauer,et al.  Intelligence and control performance on computer-simulated systems , 1994 .

[125]  Joachim Funke,et al.  When Less Is Less: Solving Multiple Simple Problems Is Not Complex Problem Solving—A comment on Greiff et al. (2015) , 2017, Journal of Intelligence.

[126]  Samuel Greiff,et al.  The Prediction of Problem-Solving Assessed Via Microworlds A Study on the Relative Relevance of Fluid Reasoning and Working Memory , 2016 .

[127]  André Kretzschmar Sometimes Less Is Not Enough: A Commentary on Greiff et al. (2015) , 2017, Journal of Intelligence.

[128]  J. Funke,et al.  The role of emotions in complex problem solving , 2005 .