Time-Varying Effective Connectivity during Visual Object Naming as a Function of Semantic Demands
暂无分享,去创建一个
Pablo Campo | Claudia Poch | Marta I Garrido | Mercedes Belinchón | José Manuel Igoa | Irene García-Morales | P. Campo | M. Garrido | I. García-Morales | C. Poch | J. Igoa | M. Belinchón
[1] J. Hodges,et al. Non-verbal semantic impairment in semantic dementia , 2000, Neuropsychologia.
[2] A. Woollams. Apples are not the only fruit: the effects of concept typicality on semantic representation in the anterior temporal lobe , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[3] Radoslaw Martin Cichy,et al. Resolving human object recognition in space and time , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.
[4] Karl J. Friston,et al. EEG and MEG Data Analysis in SPM8 , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..
[5] Tianfu Wang,et al. Effective connectivity of brain regions related to visual word recognition: An fMRI study of Chinese reading , 2015, Human brain mapping.
[6] L. Tyler,et al. Object-Specific Semantic Coding in Human Perirhinal Cortex , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[7] Leslie G. Ungerleider. Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .
[8] Matthew A. Lambon Ralph,et al. Naming in semantic dementia—what matters? , 1998, Neuropsychologia.
[9] Karl J. Friston,et al. Comparing dynamic causal models , 2004, NeuroImage.
[10] Karl J. Friston,et al. Comparing Families of Dynamic Causal Models , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[11] Dwight J. Kravitz,et al. The ventral visual pathway: an expanded neural framework for the processing of object quality , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[12] Raymond J. Dolan,et al. The Brain Ages Optimally to Model Its Environment: Evidence from Sensory Learning over the Adult Lifespan , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[13] Karl J. Friston,et al. Canonical Source Reconstruction for MEG , 2007, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..
[14] R. Desimone,et al. A backward progression of attentional effects in the ventral stream , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[15] Martin Kronbichler,et al. Top‐down and bottom‐up influences on the left ventral occipito‐temporal cortex during visual word recognition: An analysis of effective connectivity , 2014, Human brain mapping.
[16] Richard Coppola,et al. Cross-frequency power coupling between hierarchically organized face-selective areas. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.
[17] Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al. The Emergence of Semantic Meaning in the Ventral Temporal Pathway , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[18] D L Miglioretti,et al. Temporal dynamics of verbal object comprehension. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[19] David J. Jilk,et al. Recurrent Processing during Object Recognition , 2011, Front. Psychol..
[20] Andreas Keil,et al. Time course of competition for visual processing resources between emotional pictures and foreground task. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.
[21] Billi Randall,et al. From perception to conception: how meaningful objects are processed over time. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.
[22] A. W. Ellis,et al. Traces of vocabulary acquisition in the brain: Evidence from covert object naming , 2006, NeuroImage.
[23] Albert Costa,et al. Tracking lexical access in speech production: electrophysiological correlates of word frequency and cognate effects. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.
[24] Billi Randall,et al. The perirhinal cortex and conceptual processing: Effects of feature-based statistics following damage to the anterior temporal lobes , 2015, Neuropsychologia.
[25] Gregory Hickok,et al. Neural correlates of word production stages delineated by parametric modulation of psycholinguistic variables , 2009, Human brain mapping.
[26] J. Rodd,et al. Anteromedial temporal cortex supports fine-grained differentiation among objects. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.
[27] A. Friederici,et al. Dynamic Causal Modeling of Subcortical Connectivity of Language , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[28] R. C. Oldfield. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.
[29] Seppo P. Ahlfors,et al. Direction of magnetoencephalography sources associated with feedback and feedforward contributions in a visual object recognition task , 2015, Neuroscience Letters.
[30] Karl J. Friston,et al. Dynamic causal modeling of evoked responses in EEG and MEG , 2006, NeuroImage.
[31] Hugues Duffau,et al. Toward a pluri-component, multimodal, and dynamic organization of the ventral semantic stream in humans: lessons from stimulation mapping in awake patients , 2013, Front. Syst. Neurosci..
[32] Victor A F Lamme,et al. Two critical periods in early visual cortex during figure–ground segregation , 2012, Brain and behavior.
[33] Ehud Zohary,et al. Two Phases of V1 Activity for Visual Recognition of Natural Images , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[34] Karalyn Patterson,et al. The reign of typicality in semantic memory , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[35] M. Bar,et al. Top-down facilitation of visual object recognition: object-based and context-based contributions. , 2006, Progress in brain research.
[36] Karalyn Patterson,et al. Anomia: A doubly typical signature of semantic dementia , 2008, Neuropsychologia.
[37] Richard S. Frackowiak,et al. Inhibition in early Alzheimer's disease: An fMRI-based study of effective connectivity , 2011, NeuroImage.
[38] Karl J. Friston,et al. Topological inference for EEG and MEG , 2010, 1011.2901.
[39] M. Kutas,et al. Neurophysiological evidence for two processing times for visual object identification , 2002, Neuropsychologia.
[40] Peter Zeidman,et al. Identifying Abnormal Connectivity in Patients Using Dynamic Causal Modeling of fMRI Responses , 2010, Front. Syst. Neurosci..
[41] Riitta Salmelin,et al. Neural representation of language: activation versus long-range connectivity , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[42] Cathy J. Price,et al. Inter- and Intrahemispheric Connectivity Differences When Reading Japanese Kanji and Hiragana , 2013, Cerebral cortex.
[43] Karl J. Friston,et al. Models of Effective Connectivity in Neural Systems , 2007 .
[44] Mia Liljeström,et al. MEG evoked responses and rhythmic activity provide spatiotemporally complementary measures of neural activity in language production , 2012, NeuroImage.
[45] Pablo Campo,et al. Visual object naming in patients with small lesions centered at the left temporopolar region , 2014, Brain Structure and Function.
[46] Emily J. Mayberry,et al. Coherent concepts are computed in the anterior temporal lobes , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[47] K. Amunts,et al. Effective connectivity of the left BA 44, BA 45, and inferior temporal gyrus during lexical and phonological decisions identified with DCM , 2009, Human brain mapping.
[48] David J. Freedman,et al. A hierarchy of intrinsic timescales across primate cortex , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.
[49] Eric Halgren,et al. First-Pass Selectivity for Semantic Categories in Human Anteroventral Temporal Lobe , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[50] Cathy J. Price,et al. Lateralization is Predicted by Reduced Coupling from the Left to Right Prefrontal Cortex during Semantic Decisions on Written Words , 2010, Cerebral cortex.
[51] M. G. Tana,et al. Frequency-based approach to the study of semantic brain networks connectivity , 2013, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.
[52] Denis Fize,et al. Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.
[53] Angel Fernandez,et al. A set of 254 Snodgrass-Vanderwart pictures standardized for Spanish: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity , 1996 .
[54] J. F. Kalaska,et al. Attention in hierarchical models of object recognition , 2007 .
[55] M. Hallett,et al. Transient Interhemispheric Neuronal Synchrony Correlates with Object Recognition , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[56] W. Levelt,et al. Semantic Category Interference in Overt Picture Naming: Sharpening Current Density Localization by PCA , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[57] Cyril Poupon,et al. Anatomical Connections of the Visual Word Form Area , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[58] Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al. The Large-Scale Structure of Semantic Networks: Statistical Analyses and a Model of Semantic Growth , 2001, Cogn. Sci..
[59] C. Gerlach,et al. Visual complexity exerts opposing effects on object categorization and identification , 2014 .
[60] I. Olson,et al. Dissecting the uncinate fasciculus: disorders, controversies and a hypothesis. , 2013, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[61] Haline E. Schendan,et al. Object knowledge during entry-level categorization is activated and modified by implicit memory after 200 ms , 2009, NeuroImage.
[62] Giovanni Berlucchi,et al. Visual interhemispheric communication and callosal connections of the occipital lobes , 2014, Cortex.
[63] F Cuetos,et al. Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures in Spanish , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[64] James L. McClelland,et al. Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: a neuropsychological and computational investigation. , 2004, Psychological review.
[65] David J. Freedman,et al. A Comparison of Primate Prefrontal and Inferior Temporal Cortices during Visual Categorization , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[66] A. Papanicolaou,et al. Estimation of Regional Activation Maps and Interdependencies from Minimum Norm Estimates of Magnetoencephalography (MEG) Data , 2014 .
[67] Roy W Jones,et al. Comprehension of concrete and abstract words in semantic dementia. , 2009, Neuropsychology.
[68] Elaine Funnell,et al. Those old, familiar things: age of acquisition, familiarity and lexical access in progressive aphasia , 1995, Journal of Neurolinguistics.
[69] V. Lamme,et al. The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.
[70] Pablo Campo,et al. Anterobasal Temporal Lobe Lesions Alter Recurrent Functional Connectivity within the Ventral Pathway during Naming , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[71] M. Catani,et al. A diffusion tensor imaging tractography atlas for virtual in vivo dissections , 2008, Cortex.
[72] Guy B. Williams,et al. Atrophy, hypometabolism and white matter abnormalities in semantic dementia tell a coherent story. , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[73] Karl J. Friston,et al. Multiple sparse priors for the M/EEG inverse problem , 2008, NeuroImage.
[74] Joseph R. Madsen,et al. Spatiotemporal Dynamics Underlying Object Completion in Human Ventral Visual Cortex , 2014, Neuron.
[75] Karl J. Friston,et al. Free Energy, Precision and Learning: The Role of Cholinergic Neuromodulation , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[76] M. Mishkin,et al. Role of inferior temporal cortex in interhemispheric transfer , 1979, Brain Research.
[77] M. Bar,et al. The effects of priming on frontal-temporal communication , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[78] Reza Ebrahimpour,et al. The importance of visual features in generic vs. specialized object recognition: a computational study , 2014, Front. Comput. Neurosci..
[79] Karl J. Friston,et al. Forward and backward connections in the brain: A DCM study of functional asymmetries , 2009, NeuroImage.
[80] Michèle Fabre-Thorpe,et al. At 120 msec You Can Spot the Animal but You Don't Yet Know It's a Dog , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[81] Christopher K. Kovach,et al. Rapid Interactions between the Ventral Visual Stream and Emotion-Related Structures Rely on a Two-Pathway Architecture , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[82] Roy W Jones,et al. The degraded concept representation system in semantic dementia: damage to pan-modal hub, then visual spoke. , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[83] Jean K. Gordon,et al. A Neural Signature of Phonological Access: Distinguishing the Effects of Word Frequency from Familiarity and Length in Overt Picture Naming , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[84] Pascale Tremblay,et al. Beyond the arcuate fasciculus: consensus and controversy in the connectional anatomy of language. , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[85] Dwight J. Kravitz,et al. Task context impacts visual object processing differentially across the cortex , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[86] Riitta Hari,et al. Removal of magnetoencephalographic artifacts with temporal signal‐space separation: Demonstration with single‐trial auditory‐evoked responses , 2009, Human brain mapping.
[87] Michael S C Thomas,et al. Multiple Routes from Occipital to Temporal Cortices during Reading , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[88] Moshe Bar,et al. Visual predictions in the orbitofrontal cortex rely on associative content. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.
[89] James J. DiCarlo,et al. How Does the Brain Solve Visual Object Recognition? , 2012, Neuron.
[90] S. Thompson-Schill,et al. Reworking the language network , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[91] Jacob Jolij,et al. Figure–ground segregation requires two distinct periods of activity in V1: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2005, Neuroreport.
[92] W. Penny,et al. Reading Front to Back: MEG Evidence for Early Feedback Effects During Word Recognition , 2012, Cerebral cortex.
[93] Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al. Deep Supervised, but Not Unsupervised, Models May Explain IT Cortical Representation , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[94] H. Spekreijse,et al. FigureGround Segregation in a Recurrent Network Architecture , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[95] Karl J. Friston,et al. A DCM study of spectral asymmetries in feedforward and feedback connections between visual areas V1 and V4 in the monkey , 2015, NeuroImage.
[96] Karl J. Friston,et al. Ten simple rules for dynamic causal modeling , 2010, NeuroImage.
[97] Alex Clarke,et al. The Evolution of Meaning: Spatio-temporal Dynamics of Visual Object Recognition , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[98] T. Poggio,et al. Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.
[99] S. Hochstein,et al. View from the Top Hierarchies and Reverse Hierarchies in the Visual System , 2002, Neuron.
[100] Karl J. Friston,et al. Attentional Enhancement of Auditory Mismatch Responses: a DCM/MEG Study , 2015, Cerebral cortex.
[101] Nikos Makris,et al. Large-scale brain networks of the human left temporal pole: a functional connectivity MRI study. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.
[102] V. Calhoun,et al. The Chronnectome: Time-Varying Connectivity Networks as the Next Frontier in fMRI Data Discovery , 2014, Neuron.
[103] S. Thompson-Schill,et al. Conceptual Penetration of Visual Processing , 2010, Psychological science.
[104] Karl J. Friston,et al. Top-down Modulations in the Visual Form Pathway Revealed with Dynamic Causal Modeling , 2010, Cerebral cortex.
[105] F. Dick,et al. Convergent and Divergent fMRI Responses in Children and Adults to Increasing Language Production Demands , 2014, Cerebral cortex.
[106] Danling Peng,et al. Top-Down Modulations from Dorsal Stream in Lexical Recognition: An Effective Connectivity fMRI Study , 2012, PloS one.
[107] L. Tyler,et al. Predicting the Time Course of Individual Objects with MEG , 2014, Cerebral cortex.
[108] Karl J. Friston,et al. Evoked brain responses are generated by feedback loops , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[109] C. Gilbert,et al. Top-down influences on visual processing , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[110] Craig G. Richter,et al. Interareal oscillatory synchronization in top-down neocortical processing , 2015, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.
[111] E. Halgren,et al. Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[112] M. Bar,et al. Prediction, context, and competition in visual recognition , 2015, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
[113] Myrna F. Schwartz,et al. The Philadelphia Naming Test: Scoring and Rationale , 1996 .
[114] Karl J. Friston. Functional and Effective Connectivity: A Review , 2011, Brain Connect..
[115] A. Turken,et al. The Neural Architecture of the Language Comprehension Network: Converging Evidence from Lesion and Connectivity Analyses , 2011, Front. Syst. Neurosci..
[116] Joshua Kahan,et al. Comments and Controversies Understanding Dcm: Ten Simple Rules for the Clinician , 2022 .
[117] Marieke Mur. What's the Difference between a Tiger and a Cat? From Visual Object to Semantic Concept via the Perirhinal Cortex , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[118] P. Dupont,et al. Similarity of fMRI Activity Patterns in Left Perirhinal Cortex Reflects Semantic Similarity between Words , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[119] Tianzi Jiang,et al. Connectivity-based parcellation of the human temporal pole using diffusion tensor imaging. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.
[120] Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al. What's there, distinctly, when and where? , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.