Deep Neural Networks as a Computational Model for Human Shape Sensitivity
暂无分享,去创建一个
Jonas Kubilius | Stefania Bracci | Hans P. Op de Beeck | H. O. D. Beeck | Stefania Bracci | J. Kubilius
[1] Li Fei-Fei,et al. ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database , 2009, CVPR.
[2] Dirk B Walther,et al. Nonaccidental Properties Underlie Human Categorization of Complex Natural Scenes , 2014, Psychological science.
[3] I. Biederman,et al. Recognizing depth-rotated objects: evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[4] Bolei Zhou,et al. Learning Deep Features for Scene Recognition using Places Database , 2014, NIPS.
[5] N. Kanwisher,et al. Discrimination Training Alters Object Representations in Human Extrastriate Cortex , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[6] Li Su,et al. A Toolbox for Representational Similarity Analysis , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[7] Subhransu Maji,et al. Deep convolutional filter banks for texture recognition and segmentation , 2014, ArXiv.
[8] Keiji Tanaka,et al. Matching Categorical Object Representations in Inferior Temporal Cortex of Man and Monkey , 2008, Neuron.
[9] Keiji Tanaka,et al. Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. , 1996, Annual review of neuroscience.
[10] Cordelia Schmid,et al. Beyond Bags of Features: Spatial Pyramid Matching for Recognizing Natural Scene Categories , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).
[11] Bill Triggs,et al. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).
[12] I. Biederman,et al. Shape Tuning in Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[13] M J Tarr,et al. Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[14] Johan Wagemans,et al. Development of differential sensitivity for shape changes resulting from linear and nonlinear planar transformations , 2011, i-Perception.
[15] Johan Wagemans,et al. Infants and toddlers show enlarged visual sensitivity to nonaccidental compared with metric shape changes , 2010, i-Perception.
[16] J. G. Snodgrass,et al. A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.
[17] Edward A. Wasserman,et al. Pigeons and humans are more sensitive to nonaccidental than to metric changes in visual objects , 2008, Behavioural Processes.
[18] Michael J. Tarr. Is human object recognition better described by geon structural description or by multiple views , 1995 .
[19] Jonas Kubilius,et al. A framework for streamlining research workflow in neuroscience and psychology , 2014, Front. Neuroinform..
[20] I. Biederman,et al. Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. , 1993 .
[21] Ha Hong,et al. Performance-optimized hierarchical models predict neural responses in higher visual cortex , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[22] Irving Biederman,et al. Greater sensitivity to nonaccidental than metric shape properties in preschool children , 2014, Vision Research.
[23] Irving Biederman,et al. The neural basis for shape preferences , 2011, Vision Research.
[24] Michelle R. Greene,et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article The Briefest of Glances The Time Course of Natural Scene Understanding , 2022 .
[25] C. Connor,et al. Shape representation in area V4: position-specific tuning for boundary conformation. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.
[26] Nicole C. Rust,et al. Do We Know What the Early Visual System Does? , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[27] P. Roelfsema. Cortical algorithms for perceptual grouping. , 2006, Annual review of neuroscience.
[28] H. Neumann,et al. The Role of Attention in Figure-Ground Segregation in Areas V1 and V4 of the Visual Cortex , 2012, Neuron.
[29] Johan Wagemans,et al. Perceived Shape Similarity among Unfamiliar Objects and the Organization of the Human Object Vision Pathway , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[30] Steven Bird,et al. NLTK: The Natural Language Toolkit , 2002, ACL.
[31] Thomas Serre,et al. Unsupervised invariance learning of transformation sequences in a model of object recognition yields selectivity for non-accidental properties , 2015, Front. Comput. Neurosci..
[32] C. Koch,et al. Invariant visual representation by single neurons in the human brain , 2005, Nature.
[33] Johan Wagemans,et al. Identification of Everyday Objects on the Basis of Silhouette and Outline Versions , 2007, Perception.
[34] E. J. Green,et al. A Layered View of Shape Perception , 2015, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
[35] Joachim M. Buhmann,et al. Distortion Invariant Object Recognition in the Dynamic Link Architecture , 1993, IEEE Trans. Computers.
[36] I Biederman,et al. Seeing things from a different angle: the pigeon's recognition of single geons rotated in depth. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[37] B. Rossion,et al. Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's Object Pictorial Set: The Role of Surface Detail in Basic-Level Object Recognition , 2004, Perception.
[38] I. Biederman,et al. Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. , 1992, Psychological review.
[39] L. Chalupa,et al. The visual neurosciences , 2004 .
[40] I. Biederman,et al. Tuning for shape dimensions in macaque inferior temporal cortex , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.
[41] G LoweDavid,et al. Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2004 .
[42] Dumitru Erhan,et al. Going deeper with convolutions , 2014, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).
[43] Irving Biederman,et al. Representation of Shape in Individuals From a Culture With Minimal Exposure to Regular, Simple Artifacts: Sensitivity to Nonaccidental Versus Metric Properties , 2009, Psychological science.
[44] Svetlana Lazebnik,et al. Multi-scale Orderless Pooling of Deep Convolutional Activation Features , 2014, ECCV.
[45] Irving Biederman,et al. Greater sensitivity to nonaccidental than metric changes in the relations between simple shapes in the lateral occipital cortex , 2012, NeuroImage.
[46] Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience Systems Neuroscience , 2022 .
[47] Denis Fize,et al. Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.
[48] David G. Lowe,et al. Perceptual Organization and Visual Recognition , 2012 .
[49] I. Biederman,et al. Inferior Temporal Neurons Show Greater Sensitivity to Nonaccidental than to Metric Shape Differences , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[50] H. P. Op de Beeck,et al. Dissociations and Associations between Shape and Category Representations in the Two Visual Pathways , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[51] N. Kriegeskorte,et al. Inverse MDS: Inferring Dissimilarity Structure from Multiple Item Arrangements , 2012, Front. Psychology.
[52] Marcel A. J. van Gerven,et al. Deep Neural Networks Reveal a Gradient in the Complexity of Neural Representations across the Ventral Stream , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[53] Emmanuelle Gouillart,et al. scikit-image: image processing in Python , 2014, PeerJ.
[54] Leon A. Gatys,et al. Texture Synthesis Using Convolutional Neural Networks , 2015, NIPS.
[55] I. Biederman. Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.
[56] P. Perona,et al. Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[57] Leon A. Gatys,et al. A Neural Algorithm of Artistic Style , 2015, ArXiv.
[58] Antti Oulasvirta,et al. Computer Vision – ECCV 2006 , 2006, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
[59] Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al. Deep Supervised, but Not Unsupervised, Models May Explain IT Cortical Representation , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[60] Thomas Serre,et al. A feedforward architecture accounts for rapid categorization , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[61] Andrew Zisserman,et al. Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition , 2014, ICLR.
[62] Wei Wang,et al. Orientation-Cue Invariant Population Responses to Contrast-Modulated and Phase-Reversed Contour Stimuli in Macaque V1 and V2 , 2014, PloS one.
[63] J. Meere. The role of attention. , 2002 .
[64] Andrew Zisserman,et al. Representing shape with a spatial pyramid kernel , 2007, CIVR '07.
[65] J. R. Pomerantz,et al. A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: II. Conceptual and theoretical foundations. , 2012, Psychological bulletin.
[66] T. Poggio,et al. Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.
[67] Johan Wagemans,et al. A conceptual framework of computations in mid-level vision , 2014, Front. Comput. Neurosci..
[68] Michael S. Bernstein,et al. ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge , 2014, International Journal of Computer Vision.
[69] Irving Biederman,et al. Sensitivity to nonaccidental properties across various shape dimensions , 2012, Vision Research.
[70] T. Poggio,et al. How Visual Cortex Recognizes Objects: The Tale of the Standard Model , 2002 .
[71] David D. Cox,et al. Untangling invariant object recognition , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[72] Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.
[73] Trevor Darrell,et al. Caffe: Convolutional Architecture for Fast Feature Embedding , 2014, ACM Multimedia.