Adaptive auctions: Learning to adjust to bidders

Auction mechanism design has traditionally been a largely analytic process, relying on assumptions such as fully rational bidders. In practice, however, bidders behave unpredictably, making them difficult to model and complicating the design process. To address this challenge, we present an adaptive auction mechanism: one that learns to adjust its parameters in response to past empirical bidder behavior so as to maximize an objective function such as auctioneer revenue. In this paper, we give an overview of our general approach and then present an instantiation in a specific auction scenario. The algorithm is fully implemented and tested. Results indicate that the adaptive mechanism is able to outperform any single fixed mechanism.

[1]  Andrew Byde Applying evolutionary game theory to auction mechanism design , 2003, EC '03.

[2]  Ricardo Vilalta,et al.  A Perspective View and Survey of Meta-Learning , 2002, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[3]  R. Weber Making More from Less: Strategic Demand Reduction in the FCC Spectrum Auctions , 1997 .

[4]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Optimal Auction Design , 1981, Math. Oper. Res..

[5]  Michael P. Wellman,et al.  A Parametrization of the Auction Design Space , 2001, Games Econ. Behav..

[6]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction , 1998, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[7]  Foster J. Provost,et al.  Active Learning for Class Probability Estimation and Ranking , 2001, IJCAI.

[8]  Dave Cliff,et al.  Evolution of market mechanism through a continuous space of auction-types , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC'02 (Cat. No.02TH8600).

[9]  Andrew W. Moore,et al.  Locally Weighted Learning , 1997, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[10]  James C. Spall,et al.  AN OVERVIEW OF THE SIMULTANEOUS PERTURBATION METHOD FOR EFFICIENT OPTIMIZATION , 1998 .

[11]  Peter Stone,et al.  Developing adaptive auction mechanisms , 2005, SECO.

[12]  Foster J. Provost,et al.  Active Sampling for Class Probability Estimation and Ranking , 2004, Machine Learning.

[13]  David C. Parkes,et al.  Iterative combinatorial auctions: achieving economic and computational efficiency , 2001 .

[14]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[15]  P. Cramton The FCC Spectrum Auctions: An Early Assessment , 1997 .