Implementing stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis

Abstract Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA) is a family of methods for aiding multicriteria group decision making in problems with inaccurate, uncertain, or missing information. These methods are based on exploring the weight space in order to describe the preferences that make each alternative the most preferred one, or that would give a certain rank for a specific alternative. The main results of the analysis are rank acceptability indices, central weight vectors and confidence factors for different alternatives. The rank acceptability indices describe the variety of different preferences resulting in a certain rank for an alternative, the central weight vectors represent the typical preferences favouring each alternative, and the confidence factors measure whether the criteria measurements are sufficiently accurate for making an informed decision. The computations in SMAA require the evaluation of multidimensional integrals that must in practice be computed numerically. In this paper we present efficient methods for performing the computations through Monte Carlo simulation, analyze the complexity, and assess the accuracy of the presented algorithms. We also test the efficiency of these methods empirically. Based on the tests, the implementation is fast enough to analyze typical-sized discrete problems interactively within seconds. Due to almost linear time complexity, the method is also suitable for analysing very large decision problems, for example, discrete approximations of continuous decision problems.

[1]  Kaisa Miettinen,et al.  Ordinal criteria in stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA) , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Jyrki Kangas,et al.  Applying Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis to Forest Ecosystem Management with Both Cardinal and Ordinal Criteria , 2003 .

[3]  Kaisa Miettinen,et al.  Reference point approach for multiple decision makers , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Risto Lahdelma,et al.  A multiple criteria decision model for analyzing and choosing among different development patterns for the Helsinki cargo harbor , 1999 .

[5]  Risto Lahdelma,et al.  Locating a waste treatment facility by using stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis with ordinal criteria , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  P. Fishburn Analysis of Decisions with Incomplete Knowledge of Probabilities , 1965 .

[7]  Kaisa Miettinen,et al.  Determining the implementation order of a general plan by using a multicriteria method , 1998 .

[8]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys , 2005 .

[9]  Joonas Hokkanen,et al.  Multicriteria decision support in a technology competition for cleaning polluted soil in Helsinki , 2000 .

[10]  Risto Lahdelma,et al.  SMAA - Stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Annika Kangas,et al.  Using SMAA-2 method with dependent uncertainties for strategic forest planning , 2006 .

[12]  Jyrki Kangas,et al.  Multicriteria approval and SMAA-O in natural resources decision analysis with both ordinal and cardinal criteria , 2003 .

[13]  Joseph A. Wolkan,et al.  Introduction to probability and statistics , 1994 .

[14]  José Rui Figueira,et al.  SMAA-TRI: A parameter stability analysis method for ELECTRE TRI , 2007 .

[15]  H. Kunzi,et al.  Lectu re Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems , 1975 .

[16]  Risto Lahdelma,et al.  Choosing a Reparation Method for a Landfill by Using the SMAA-O Multicriteria Method , 2001 .

[17]  Risto Lahdelma,et al.  Classifying efficient alternatives in SMAA using cross confidence factors , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  W. J. DeCoursey,et al.  Introduction: Probability and Statistics , 2003 .

[19]  L. Dias,et al.  ELECTRE TRI for Groups with Imprecise Information on Parameter Values , 2000 .

[20]  Luis C. Dias,et al.  An aggregation/disaggregation approach to obtain robust conclusions with ELECTRE TRI , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  Vincent Mousseau,et al.  A user-oriented implementation of the ELECTRE-TRI method integrating preference elicitation support , 2000, Comput. Oper. Res..

[22]  Risto Lahdelma,et al.  SMAA-2: Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis for Group Decision Making , 2001, Oper. Res..

[23]  Ronald L. Wasserstein,et al.  Monte Carlo: Concepts, Algorithms, and Applications , 1997 .

[24]  M. Degroot,et al.  Probability and Statistics , 2021, Examining an Operational Approach to Teaching Probability.

[25]  Risto Lahdelma,et al.  Pseudo-criteria versus linear utility function in stochastic multi-criteria acceptability analysis , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  Rakesh K. Sarin,et al.  Ranking with Partial Information: A Method and an Application , 1985, Oper. Res..

[27]  R. Soland,et al.  Multiple‐attribute decision making with partial information: The comparative hypervolume criterion , 1978 .

[28]  Gordon B. Hazen,et al.  Partial Information, Dominance, and Potential Optimality in Multiattribute Utility Theory , 1986, Oper. Res..

[29]  C. B. E. Costa A multicriteria decision aid methodology to deal with conflicting situations on the weights , 1986 .

[30]  Luis C. Dias,et al.  Resolving inconsistencies among constraints on the parameters of an MCDA model , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  Ian N. Durbach,et al.  A simulation-based test of stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis using achievement functions , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..