A Resource-Rational Process-Level Account of the St. Petersburg Paradox
暂无分享,去创建一个
Ardavan Salehi Nobandegani | Thomas R. Shultz | Kevin da Silva Castanheira | A. Ross Otto | T. Shultz | A. R. Otto | A. S. Nobandegani
[1] Falk Lieder,et al. Resource-rational analysis: Understanding human cognition as the optimal use of limited computational resources , 2019, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[2] Ardavan Salehi Nobandegani,et al. On Robustness: An Undervalued Dimension of Human Rationality , 2019, CogSci.
[3] Ardavan Salehi Nobandegani,et al. Sample-Based Variant of Expected Utility Explains Effects of Time Pressure and Individual Differences in Processing Speed on Risk Preferences , 2019, CogSci.
[4] Ardavan Salehi Nobandegani,et al. Decoy Effect and Violation of Betweenness in Risky Decision Making: A Resource-Rational Mechanistic Account , 2019, CogSci.
[5] Ardavan Salehi Nobandegani,et al. A Resource-Rational Mechanistic Approach to One-shot Non-cooperative Games: The Case of Prisoner's Dilemma , 2019, CogSci.
[6] Ardavan Salehi Nobandegani,et al. Contextual Effects in Value-Based Decision Making: A Resource-Rational Mechanistic Account , 2019, Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.
[7] James C. Cox,et al. The St. Petersburg paradox despite risk-seeking preferences: an experimental study , 2018, Business Research.
[8] Noah D. Goodman,et al. Empirical evidence for resource-rational anchoring and adjustment , 2017, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
[9] Ardavan Salehi Nobandegani,et al. Over-representation of Extreme Events in Decision-Making: A Rational Metacognitive Account , 2018, CogSci.
[10] Falk Lieder,et al. Overrepresentation of Extreme Events in Decision Making Reflects Rational Use of Cognitive Resources , 2017, Psychological review.
[11] Rémi Bardenet,et al. Monte Carlo Methods , 2013, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining. 2nd Ed..
[12] Ardavan Salehi Nobandegani,et al. Example Generation Under Constraints Using Cascade Correlation Neural Nets , 2018, CogSci.
[13] S. Gershman,et al. Where do hypotheses come from? , 2017, Cognitive Psychology.
[14] Ardavan Salehi Nobandegani,et al. Converting Cascade-Correlation Neural Nets into Probabilistic Generative Models , 2017, CogSci.
[15] Adam N. Sanborn,et al. Bayesian Brains without Probabilities , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[16] Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al. Building machines that learn and think like people , 2016, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[17] R. Hertwig. Decisions from Experience , 2015 .
[18] Samuel J. Gershman,et al. Computational rationality: A converging paradigm for intelligence in brains, minds, and machines , 2015, Science.
[19] Thomas L. Griffiths,et al. Rational Use of Cognitive Resources: Levels of Analysis Between the Computational and the Algorithmic , 2015, Top. Cogn. Sci..
[20] S. Denison,et al. Probabilistic models, learning algorithms, and response variability: sampling in cognitive development , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[21] Thomas L. Griffiths,et al. One and Done? Optimal Decisions From Very Few Samples , 2014, Cogn. Sci..
[22] D. Read,et al. Prospect theory and the “forgotten” fourfold pattern of risk preferences , 2014 .
[23] Jessica B. Hamrick,et al. Simulation as an engine of physical scene understanding , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[24] N. Barberis. The Psychology of Tail Events: Progress and Challenges , 2013 .
[25] Adam N. Sanborn,et al. Bridging Levels of Analysis for Probabilistic Models of Cognition , 2012 .
[26] Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al. Multistability and Perceptual Inference , 2012, Neural Computation.
[27] Thomas M. Cover,et al. On the St. Petersburg paradox , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory Proceedings.
[28] D. Knill,et al. Bayesian sampling in visual perception , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[29] Zachary C. Burns,et al. Overweighting of Small Probabilities , 2011 .
[30] Bodo Vogt,et al. On the Empirical Relevance of St. Petersburg Lotteries , 2011 .
[31] Adam N Sanborn,et al. Rational approximations to rational models: alternative algorithms for category learning. , 2010, Psychological review.
[32] Timothy J. Pleskac,et al. Decisions from experience: Why small samples? , 2010, Cognition.
[33] Tibor Neugebauer. Moral Impossibility in the Petersburg Paradox : A Literature Survey and Experimental Evidence , 2010 .
[34] B. Hayden,et al. The mean, the median, and the St. Petersburg paradox. , 2009, Judgment and decision making.
[35] N. Chater,et al. Are Probabilities Overweighted or Underweighted When Rare Outcomes Are Experienced (Rarely)? , 2009, Psychological science.
[36] James C. Cox,et al. Risky Decisions in the Large and in the Small:Theory and Experiment , 2008 .
[37] James C. Cox,et al. Is There A Plausible Theory for Risky Decisions , 2007 .
[38] Gordon D. A. Brown,et al. Decision by sampling , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.
[39] Colin Camerer. Three Cheers—Psychological, Theoretical, Empirical—for Loss Aversion , 2005 .
[40] Pavlo R. Blavatskyy,et al. Back to the St. Petersburg Paradox? , 2005, Manag. Sci..
[41] Mei Wang,et al. Cumulative prospect theory and the St. Petersburg paradox , 2006 .
[42] G. Shafer. St. Petersburg Paradox , 2004 .
[43] Lynne M. Reder,et al. Metacognition in Strategy Selection , 2002 .
[44] H. Poor. An Introduction to Signal Detection and Estimation , 1994, Springer Texts in Electrical Engineering.
[45] A. Tversky,et al. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty , 1992 .
[46] J. Geweke,et al. Bayesian Inference in Econometric Models Using Monte Carlo Integration , 1989 .
[47] William P. Bottom,et al. Experts, Novices, and the St. Petersburg paradox: Is one solution enough? , 1989 .
[48] On the St. Petersburg paradox , 1988 .
[49] Amos Tversky,et al. Risk: The Long and the Short. , 1983 .
[50] Lola L. Lopes. Decision Making in the Short Run. , 1981 .
[51] A. Tversky,et al. Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .
[52] Robert J. Aumann,et al. The St. Petersburg paradox: A discussion of some recent comments , 1977 .
[53] P. Samuelson. St. Petersburg Paradoxes: Defanged, Dissected, and Historically Described , 1977 .
[54] Daniel Kahneman,et al. Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .
[55] A. Tversky,et al. Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness , 1972 .
[56] D. Ellsberg. Decision, probability, and utility: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms , 1961 .
[57] William Vickrey,et al. Utility, Strategy, and Social Decision Rules , 1960 .
[58] Paul A. Samuelson,et al. The St. Petersburg Paradox as a Divergent Double Limit , 1960 .
[59] Archive for History of Exact Sciences , 1960, Nature.
[60] L. J. Savage,et al. The Foundations of Statistics , 1955 .
[61] D. Bernoulli. Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk , 1954 .
[62] H. Markowitz. The Utility of Wealth , 1952, Journal of Political Economy.
[63] K. Arrow. Alternative Approaches to the Theory of Choice in Risk-Taking Situations , 1951 .
[64] K. Menger,et al. Das Unsicherheitsmoment in der Wertlehre , 1934 .
[65] R. E. Moritz. Some Curious Fallacies in the Study of Probabilities , 1923 .
[66] B. Russell,et al. A Treatise on Probability , 1921 .